- Research Article
1
- 10.7759/cureus.30296
Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective Study on the Impact of Donor-Specific Antibodies and on the Timing of Diagnosis.
- Oct 14, 2022
- Cureus
- Pedro Reis Pereira + 9 more +9
Introduction Limitedinformation exists concerning the clinical significance of histologically confirmed antibody-mediated rejection (h-AMR) without detectable circulating donor-specific antibodies (DSA). In this study, we compared the outcomes of patients with h-AMR according toDSAstatus. Methods A total of 80 kidney transplant (KT) recipients who met the 2018 Banff criteria for h-AMR were included. Clinical and immunological characteristics were evaluated, and outcomes were compared according toDSAstatus after kidney biopsy (KB). Results There were 57 patients who had DSA-positive (+) h-AMR and 23 patients who hadDSA-negative (-) h-AMR. Groups had similar baseline characteristics and time between KT and KB. Concerning histopathological diagnoses/Banff scores,DSA+ patients had higher interstitial fibrosis (ci) and tubular atrophy (ct) (ci+ct) scores and lower arterial hyalinosis (ah) scores compared toDSA- patients. Graft survival (GS) was similar for both groups (64% versus 44% at five years and 44% versus 34% at 10 years).Multivariate analysis revealed the time of KB (less than six months after KT or more than six months after KT) to be associated with GS. A stratified analysis was conducted, targetingDSAstatus according to the time of biopsy. For KB performed less than six months after KT, GS was higher forDSA+ patients at 10 years (66% versus 23%). For KB performed more than six months after KT,DSA- patients had higher GS at 10 years (58% versus 9%). Conclusion Both the timing of AMR diagnosis and DSA status had an impact on AMR outcomes. For patients diagnosed with AMR more than six months after transplantation, GS was worst for those in which circulating DSA were identified. Biopsy specimens from DSA- specimens had higher ct-ci and ah scores.
Read more