Ascensia Diabetes Care (Switzerland)

BackgroundAcute heart failure is the most frequent cause of unplanned hospital admission in elderly patients. Various biomarkers have been evaluated to better assess the status of these patients and prevent decompensation. Recently, voice has been suggested as a cost‐effective and noninvasive way to monitor disease progression. This study evaluates speech and pause alterations in patients with acute decompensated and stable heart failure. Specifically, we aim to identify a vocal biomarker that could be used to monitor patients with heart failure and to prevent decompensation.Methods and ResultsSpeech and pause patterns were evaluated in 68 patients with acute and 36 patients with stable heart failure. Voice recordings were performed using a web‐browser based application that consisted of 5 tasks. Speech and pause patterns were automatically extracted and compared between acute and stable patients and with clinical markers. Compared with stable patients, pause ratio was up to 14.9% increased in patients with acute heart failure. This increase was largely independent of sex, age, and ejection fraction and persisted in patients with lower degrees of edema or dyspnea. Furthermore, pause ratio was positively correlated with NT‐proBNP (N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide) after controlling for acute versus stable heart failure. Collectively, our findings indicate that the pause ratio could be useful in identifying acute heart failure, particularly in patients who do not display traditional indicators of decompensation.ConclusionsSpeech and pause patterns are altered in patients with acute heart failure. Particularly, we identified pause ratio as an easily interpretable vocal biomarker to support the monitoring of heart failure decompensation.

Monitoring glycaemic control in patients with diabetes has evolved dramatically over the past decades. The introduction of easy-to-use systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) utilising capillary blood samples has resulted in the availability of a wide range of systems, providing different measurement quality. Systems for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) – used mainly in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) – were made possible by the development of glucose sensors that measure glucose levels in the interstitial fluid (ISF) in the subcutaneous tissue of the skin. CGM readings might not correspond exactly to SMBG measurement results taken at the same time, especially during rapid changes in either blood glucose or ISF glucose levels. The mean absolute relative difference is the most popular method used for characterising the measurement performance of CGM systems. Unlike the International Organization for Standardization 15197:2013 criteria for SMBG systems, no accuracy standards for CGM systems exist. Measurement quality of CGM systems can vary based on several factors, limiting their safety and effective use in managing diabetes. Patients have to be trained adequately to make safe and efficient use of CGM systems (like with SMBG systems). Also, systems for CGM must be evaluated in terms of patient safety and the ability to provide accurate measurements regardless of the fluctuation of glucose levels. As new technological advancements in glucose monitoring are essential for improved management options of diabetes, such as automated insulin dosing systems, there is a need for a critical view of all such developments. It is likely that both, SMBG and CGM systems, will play important future roles in the treatment of diabetes.

Personalised health care is an evolution, moving away from a disease-focused model of care, translating scientific and technological advances into benefits for patients, and placing them at the centre of the patients' health and care. Companion diagnostics emerge as a very specific and special group of in vitro diagnostics among the different technologies shaping the personalised health care spectrum. Companion diagnostics provide highly valuable information, allowing patients, health practitioners and payers to decide with a higher level of certainty on the potential benefits of a treatment or care pathway. Decreasing uncertainty may result in a more efficient selection of treatments and care, targeted at subpopulations that are most likely to benefit. Companion diagnostics account for a minimal portion of the already small expenditure on in vitro diagnostics (far less than 1% of total health care expenditure), and yet they provide the means to limit inefficient use of health care resources while optimising patient outcomes. It is clear that equal access to personalised health care is still an issue across the EU. One of the most common perceived barriers is affordability. The investment in companion diagnostics can provide long-term value for patients and health care systems, shifting resources to areas of need. Health systems do not fully recognise yet the value that companion diagnostics bring to make personalised health care more affordable across the EU. This inhibits patient access to personalised treatments and care, preventing improved outcomes. In many countries, market access frameworks for diagnostic tests are fragmented and not aligned with specific funding and reimbursement mechanisms, discouraging the use of these tests. Emerging evidence shows that patients are missing out on the appropriate tests and treatments while a reduction in the inefficient use of health care resources is not realised. This article outlines some of these market access barriers for companion diagnostics in the EU, including reimbursement challenges specific to some member states (Germany, the UK, and France). Furthermore, proposals addressing barriers and increasing timely patient access to companion diagnostics in the EU are presented.