BongSeng Memorial Hospital

Evogliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor with a glucose-dependent mechanism of action, is widely used as a monotherapy or in combination with other agents. However, observational studies in routine clinical settings remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of evogliptin in combination with other antidiabetic agents frequently used in clinical practice. This study was conducted in 51 hospitals in South Korea. We evaluated evogliptin in three groups: the evogliptin add-on, evogliptin-switching, and initial combination groups. The primary endpoint was the change in haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels (%) from baseline to 12 weeks. The change in HbA1c (%) levels from baseline to 24 weeks was a secondary endpoint in the extended study. Proportions of patients achieving the HbA1c target, changes in fasting and postprandial glucose levels, and safety endpoints were also evaluated. Between-group comparisons were performed between the add-on and initial combination groups. In the 1596 patients of the effectiveness set, the mean changes in HbA1c levels at 12 weeks were -0.8% ± 1.2%, -0.3% ± 0.8% and -1.9% ± 1.4% for the evogliptin add-on, evogliptin-switching and initial combination groups, respectively. Among the 1920 patients in the safety set, 23 experienced adverse drug reactions, and there was no significant difference among the three groups. Evogliptin reduces blood glucose levels and is well-tolerated when used as an add-on, as a switch from other dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, or as part of an initial combination therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

A combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab is currently recommended for treating unresectable advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), as it has demonstrated superior overall survival and progression-free survival compared to sorafenib. However, concerns have been raised regarding serious adverse events associated with bevacizumab, such as gastrointestinal perforation, fistula, hemorrhage, and arterial thromboembolism. In particular, patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) show an increased risk of variceal bleeding. However, brain hemorrhage associated with the use of bevacizumab in patients with HCC and LC is extremely rare. We encountered two cases of brain hemorrhage in patients with HCC and LC who underwent treatment with atezolizumab and bevacizumab. One patient had no history of hypertension, while the other patient had hypertension that was well-controlled with medication and an unruptured brain aneurysm located on the right side of the anterior communicating artery. Both patients experienced brain hemorrhage after two treatment cycles of atezolizumab with bevacizumab. One patient died due to brain hemorrhage, while the other patient recovered from subarachnoid hemorrhage with successful coil embolization. This case report suggests that if a patient has any high-risk factors associated with brain hemorrhage, physicians should thoroughly consider alternative treatment options for advanced HCC, as brain hemorrhage could be fatal.

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 33(11S):p 917, November 2022. | DOI: 10.1681/ASN.20223311S1917c

BackgroundFavorable long-term and short-term graft survival and patient survival after kidney transplantation (KT) from deceased donors with acute kidney injury (AKI) have been reported. However, few studies have evaluated effects of donor AKI status on graft outcomes after KT in Asian population. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate graft function after KTs from donors with AKI compared to matched KTs from donors without AKI using a multicenter cohort in Korea.MethodsWe analyzed a total of 1,466 KTs collected in Korean Organ Transplant Registry between April 2014 and December 2017. KTs from AKI donors (defined as donors with serum creatinine level ≥ 2 mg/dL) and non-AKI donors (275 cases for each group) were enrolled using a 1:1 propensity score matching. Graft outcomes including graft and patient survival, delayed graft function (DGF), rejection rate, and serially measured estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were evaluated.ResultsAfter propensity matching, KTs from AKI donors showed higher rate of DGF (44.7% vs. 24.0%, p < 0.001). However, the rejection rate was not significantly different between the two groups (KTs from AKI donors vs. KTs from non-AKI donors). eGFRs measured after 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years were not significantly different by donor AKI status. With median follow-up duration of 3.52 years, cox proportional hazards models revealed hazard ratio of 0.973 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.584 to 1.621), 1.004 (95% CI, 0.491 to 2.054) and 0.808 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.426 to 1.532) for overall graft failure, death-censored graft failure and patient mortality, respectively, in KTs from AKI donors compared to KTs from non-AKI donors as a reference.ConclusionsKTs from AKI donors showed comparable outcomes to KTs from non-AKI donors, despite a higher incidence of DGF. Results of this study supports the validity of using kidneys from deceased AKI donors in Asian population.

The aim of this study is to investigate whether or not delayed graft function (DGF) and pre-transplant sensitization have synergistic adverse effects on allograft outcome after deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) using the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry (KOTRY) database, the nationwide prospective cohort. The study included 1359 cases between May 2014 and June 2019. The cases were divided into 4 subgroups according to pre-sensitization and the development of DGF post-transplant [non-pre-sensitized-DGF(−) (n = 1097), non-pre-sensitized-DGF(+) (n = 127), pre-sensitized-DGF(−) (n = 116), and pre-sensitized-DGF(+) (n = 19)]. We compared the incidence of biopsy-proven allograft rejection (BPAR), time-related change in allograft function, allograft or patient survival, and post-transplant complications across 4 subgroups. The incidence of acute antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) was significantly higher in the pre-sensitized-DGF(+) subgroup than in other 3 subgroups. In addition, multivariable cox regression analysis demonstrated that pre-sensitization combined with DGF is an independent risk factor for the development of acute ABMR (hazard ratio 4.855, 95% confidence interval 1.499–15.727). Moreover, DGF and pre-sensitization showed significant interaction (p-value for interaction = 0.008). Pre-sensitization combined with DGF did not show significant impact on allograft function, and allograft or patient survival. In conclusion, the combination of pre-sensitization and DGF showed significant synergistic interaction on the development of allograft rejection after DDKT.

ObjectiveCardiovascular diseases are representative risk factors for the onset of cognitive decline. The purpose of this study was to confirm the relationship between diastolic blood pressure and cognitive function in elderly people in Korea.MethodsData from subjects who were enrolled in the prospective Korean Longitudinal Study on Cognitive Aging and Dementia were used in this study. Data from 701 subjects whose diastolic blood pressure range did not change (≤79 mm Hg or ≥80 mm Hg) over 2 years were analyzed. To analyze the differences in cognitive function between the groups at the 2-year follow-up, an analysis of covariance was performed with covariates, which were significantly different between the two groups, and the baseline cognitive function.ResultsSignificant differences were observed between the two groups, and the mean scores on the constructional praxis (η2=0.010) and word list recall tests (η2=0.018) in the diastolic blood pressure ≥80 mm Hg group were higher than those in the diastolic blood pressure ≤79 mm Hg group at the 2-year follow-up.ConclusionThese results indicate that maintaining a DBP below 79 mm Hg presents a greater risk of cognitive decline in Korean elderly people.

ObjectiveThis study aimed to examine the association between normal-but-low folate levels and cognitive function in the elderly population using a prospective cohort study. MethodsWe analyzed 3,910 participants whose serum folate levels were within the normal reference range (1.5–16.9 ng/mL) at baseline evaluation in the population-based prospective cohort study named the “Korean Longitudinal Study on Cognitive Aging and Dementia.” The association between baseline folate quartile categories and baseline cognitive disorders [mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia] was examined using binary logistic regression analysis adjusting for confounding variables. The risks of incident MCI and dementia associated with the decline of serum folate level during a 4-year follow-up period were examined using multinomial logistic regression analysis. ResultsThe lowest quartile group of serum folate (≥1.5, ≤5.9 ng/mL) showed a higher risk of cognitive disorders than did the highest quartile group at baseline evaluation (odds ratio 1.314, p=0.012). Over the 4 years of follow-up, the risk of incident dementia was 2.364 times higher among subjects whose serum folate levels declined from the 2nd–4th quartile group to the 1st quartile than among those for whom it did not (p=0.031). ConclusionNormal-but-low serum folate levels were associated with the risk of cognitive disorders in the elderly population, and a decline to normal-but-low serum folate levels was associated with incident dementia. Maintaining serum folate concentration above 5.9 ng/mL may be beneficial for cognitive status.