- Preprint Article
- 10.5194/egusphere-egu26-17124
Evapotranspiration Intercomparison of Field-to-Regional Scale Methods at the LIAISE Experiment
- Mar 14, 2026
- Mary Rose Mangan + 16 more +16
Quantifying the evaporative flux from the land surface into the atmosphere is important for local irrigation management, regional water management and global weather prediction, but measuring evapotranspiration (ET) remains a challenge. Methods that directly measure ET, including eddy covariance and lysimeters, have high temporal resolution but limited spatial coverage, while indirect estimates, including remote sensing techniques, have broad spatial coverage but lower temporal frequency. Each principle for estimating ET comes with unique uncertainties, so a combined use of these methods under identical conditions, which is rarely done in field campaigns, should be promoted to assess its relative and overall performance. In order to quantify the relative uncertainty of different commonly-used ET estimation techniques, we performed an ET method intercomparison using data from the 2021 Land surface Interactions with the Atmosphere over the Iberian Semi-arid Environment (LIAISE) experiment (Boone et al., 2025). Fifteen ET estimation methods were evaluated across six crop types, spanning footprint extents from individual fields to the regional scale and encompassing multiple measurement principles. We also include an upscaled “mixed-agriculture” estimate from the eddy-covariance data to match the footprints of methodologies that cover more than one field (e.g. satellite remote sensing data and long-path scintillometry) We find that the total sampling uncertainty in the eddy covariance measurements is between 10% and 20% of the latent heat flux regardless of time of day. Moreover, we find that standard deviation among different ET methods for a single crop type (between 2.0 and 3.7 mm day-1) is greater than the standard deviation among the different crop types (1.9 mm day-1) in the LIAISE domain.
Read more