Decipher Biosciences (Canada)

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a blood cancer caused by uncontrolled growth of clonal plasmacells. Bone disease is responsible for the severe complications of MM and is caused by myeloma cells infiltrating the bone marrow and inducing osteoclast activation. To date, no treatment for MM is truly curative since patients relapse and become refractory to all drug classes. Cannabinoids are already used as palliative in cancer patients. Furthermore, their proper anticancer effect was demonstrated in many cancer models in vitro, in vivo, and in clinical trials. Anyway, few information was reported on the effect of cannabinoids on MM and no data has been provided on minor phytocannabinoids such as cannabigerol (CBG), cannabichromene (CBC), cannabinol (CBN), and cannabidivarin (CBDV). Scientific literature also reported cannabinoids beneficial effect against bone disease. Here, we examined the cytotoxic activity of CBG, CBC, CBN, and CBDV in vitro in MM cell lines, their effect in modulating MM cells invasion toward bone cells and the bone resorption. Subsequently, according to the in vitro results, we selected CBN for in vivo study in a MM xenograft mice model. Results showed that the phytocannabinoids inhibited MM cell growth and induced necrotic cell death. Moreover, the phytocannabinoids reduced the invasion of MM cells toward osteoblast cells and bone resorption in vitro. Lastly, CBN reduced in vivo tumor mass. Together, our results suggest that CBG, CBC, CBN, and CBDV can be promising anticancer agents for MM.

<div>AbstractPurpose:<p>The role of immune-oncologic mechanisms of racial disparities in prostate cancer remains understudied. Limited research exists to evaluate the molecular underpinnings of immune differences in African American men (AAM) and European American men (EAM) prostate tumor microenvironment (TME).</p>Experimental Design:<p>A total of 1,173 radiation-naïve radical prostatectomy samples with whole transcriptome data from the Decipher GRID registry were used. Transcriptomic expressions of 1,260 immune-specific genes were selected to assess immune-oncologic differences between AAM and EAM prostate tumors. Race-specific differential expression of genes was assessed using a rank test, and intergene correlational matrix and gene set enrichment was used for pathway analysis.</p>Results:<p>AAM prostate tumors have significant enrichment of major immune-oncologic pathways, including proinflammatory cytokines, IFNα, IFNγ, TNFα signaling, ILs, and epithelial–mesenchymal transition. AAM TME has higher total immune content score (ICS<sup>HIGH</sup>) compared with 0 (37.8% vs. 21.9%, <i>P</i> = 0.003). AAM tumors also have lower DNA damage repair and are genomically radiosensitive as compared with EAM. <i>IFITM3</i> (IFN-inducible transmembrane protein 3) was one of the major proinflammatory genes overexpressed in AAM that predicted increased risk of biochemical recurrence selectively for AAM in both discovery [HR<sub>AAM</sub> = 2.30; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.21–4.34; <i>P</i> = 0.01] and validation (HR<sub>AAM</sub> = 2.42; 95% CI, 1.52–3.86; <i>P</i> = 0.0001) but not in EAM.</p>Conclusions:<p>Prostate tumors of AAM manifest a unique immune repertoire and have significant enrichment of proinflammatory immune pathways that are associated with poorer outcomes. Observed immune-oncologic differences can aid in a genomically adaptive approach to treating prostate cancer in AAM.</p></div>

ObjectiveTo assess the association between Genomic Classifier (GC)‐risk group and post‐radical prostatectomy treatment in clinical practice.MethodsTwo prospective observational cohorts of men with prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent RP in two referral centers and had GC testing post‐prostatectomy between 2013 and 2018 were included. The primary endpoint of the study was to assess the association between GC‐risk group and time to secondary therapy. Univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to assess the association between GC‐risk group and time to receipt of secondary therapy after RP, where secondary therapy is defined as receiving either RT or ADT after RP.ResultsA total of 398 patients are included in the analysis. Patients with high‐GC risk were more likely to receive any secondary therapy (OR: 6.84) compared to patients with low/intermediate‐GC risk. The proportion of high‐GC risk patients receiving RT at 2 years post‐RP was 31.5%, compared to only 6.3% among the low/intermediate‐GC risk patients.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that physicians in routine practice used GC to identify high risk patients who might benefit the most from secondary treatment. As such, GC score was independent predictor of receipt of secondary treatment.

162 Background: Through gene expression profiling (GEP), the PAM50 classifier demonstrates prognostic value in localized prostate cancer (PCa). Pre-clinical drug response models predict increased taxane sensitivity in luminal subtypes compared to basal subtype. Men with mHSPC and high-risk features have greatest benefit from androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus docetaxel (D) vs ADT alone. We therefore sought to test the prognostic and predictive value of PAM50 in pre-ADT specimens from E3805 CHAARTED. Methods: Whole transcriptomic profiling of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded primary PCa biopsies from pts enrolled in the E3805 CHAARTED trial of ADT vs ADT+D was performed using the Human Exon 1.0 ST microarray platform (Decipher Biosciences). Normalized gene expression was used to classify subjects as luminal A, luminal B or basal subtype. Multivariable analyses (MVA) adjusted for ECOG status, de novo metastasis vs prior local therapy and volume of disease. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoint was time to castration resistant PCa (TTCRPC). Results: Successful GEP was completed in 160 of 198 pts with available specimens. Eighty (50%), 77 (48%) and 3 (2%) pts were classified as luminal B, basal and luminal A, respectively. High volume disease was similarly present in luminal B (79%) and basal (78%) subtypes. In the ADT arm, luminal B subtype was associated with shorter OS vs basal (HR 1.75, p=0.05); consistent in MVA. Pts with luminal B subtype treated with ADT+D showed significant improvement in TTCRPC and OS (Table). By contrast, basal subtype showed no OS benefit from ADT+D even in pts with high volume disease. Conclusions: We demonstrate that GEP identifies tumor subtypes associated with differential benefit from chemohormonal therapy for mHSPC. Luminal B subtype is associated with poorer OS with ADT alone and benefits from addition of D. Basal subtype shows a lack of OS benefit from upfront ADT+D. We plan to validate these findings in independent trial cohorts.[Table: see text]