- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.jval.2025.09.224
CO122 Factors Associated With Response to Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
- Dec 01, 2025
- Value in Health
- Sebastiaan T Peters + 5 more +5
Publications from 2021 to 2026
Showing 10 of 15 papers
CO122 Factors Associated With Response to Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
What are the perspectives of patients with hand and wrist conditions, chronic pain, and patients recovering from stroke on the use of patient and outcome information in everyday care? A Mixed-Methods study
PurposeTo evaluate the patients’ perspectives on the use of patient- and outcome information tools in everyday care and to investigate which characteristics affect general understanding and perceived value of patient- and outcome information.MethodsThis mixed-methods study included surveys and interviews on understanding, experience, decision-support, and perceived value in patients with hand and wrist conditions and chronic pain. We synthesized our quantitative and qualitative findings using a triangulation protocol and identified factors independently associated with general understanding and perceived value of patient- and outcome information using hierarchical logistic regression.ResultsWe included 3379 patients. The data triangulation indicated that patients understand the outcome information, they find it valuable, it supports decision-making, and it improves patient-clinician interaction. The following variables were independently associated with better general understanding: having more difficulty with questionnaires (standardized odds ratio 0.34 [95%-CI 031–0.38]), having a finger condition (0.72 [0.57–0.92]), longer follow-up (0.75 [0.61–0.91]), and undergoing surgical treatment (ref: non-surgical treatment, 1.33 [1.11–1.59]). For more general value, these were: having more difficulty with questionnaires (0.40 [0.36–0.44]), having a wrist condition (0.71 [0.54–0.92]), better hand function (1.12 [1.02–1.22]), and requiring help with questionnaires (1.65 [1.33–2.05]).ConclusionPatients value the use of patient- and outcome information tools in daily care and find it easy to understand. The factors associated with understanding and value can be targeted to personalized and value-based healthcare. We recommend using outcome information to improve patient independence, empowerment, and involvement in decision-making.
Read moreLa multimorbidité : l’abandon du modèle de réadaptation axé sur une seule maladie
Find information about UTP Journals. University of Toronto Press is Canada’s leading academic publisher and one of the largest university presses in North America, with particular strengths in the social sciences, humanities, and business. The Book Publishing Division is widely recognized in Canada for its strength in history, political science, sociology, Indigenous studies, and cultural studies. Internationally, UTP is a leading publisher of medieval, Renaissance, Italian, Iberian, Slavic, and urban studies, as well as studies in book and print culture.
Read morePsychological factors are more strongly associated with pain than radiographic severity in non-invasively treated first carpometacarpal osteoarthritis
Background The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent psychological factors are related to pain levels prior to non-invasive treatment in patients with osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint. Methods We included patients (n = 255) at the start of non-invasive treatment for osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint who completed the Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire. Psychological distress, pain catastrophizing behavior and illness perception was measured. X-rays were scored on presence of scaphotrapeziotrapezoid osteoarthritis. We used hierarchical linear regression analysis to determine to what extent pain levels could be explained by patient characteristics, X-ray scores, and psychological factors. Results Patient characteristics and X-ray scores accounted for only 6% of the variation in pre-treatment pain levels. After adding the psychological factors to our model, 47% of the variance could be explained. Conclusions Our results show that psychological factors are more strongly related to pain levels prior to non-invasive treatment in patients with osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint than patient characteristics and X-ray scores, which implies the important role of these factors in the reporting of symptoms. More research is needed to determine whether psychological factors will also affect treatment outcomes for patients treated non-invasively for osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION Pain is the most important complaint for patients with osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint. Psychological factors are strongly associated with pain levels prior to treatment. Pain catastrophizing behavior appears to be a promising target for complementary treatment in patients with osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint.
Read moreBeneficial Effects of Nonsurgical Treatment for Symptomatic Thumb Carpometacarpal Instability in Clinical Practice: A Cohort Study
Latent tuberculosis screening and treatment among asylum seekers: a mixed-methods study.
22 Person-Environment-Occupation-Performance-Modell (PEOP) und PEOP Occupational Therapy Process
Predicting Outcome After Hand Orthosis and Hand Therapy for Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Study
Remerciements
Nouveau guide de pratique en ergothérapie : entre concepts et réalités