- Research Article
- 10.5595/001c.145196
The Triple Nexus of Peace, Security, and Disaster Risk Management Actors for Conflict Prevention: The Case of Ataye, North Shewa, Ethiopia
- Oct 16, 2025
- IDRiM Journal
- Negesse Asnake Ayalew + 1 more +1
This study examines the effectiveness of inter-ethnic conflict resolution mechanisms in Ethiopia, focusing on Ataye town in the North Shewa Administrative Zone of the Amhara National Regional State. It assesses the contributions of ‘traditional’ conflict resolution mechanisms and other more formal and alternative dispute resolution strategies employed by the Government of Ethiopia, including federal institutions such as the House of Federation, the Ministries of Peace, and Justice, as well as the Disaster Risk Management (DRM) Council. The DRM Council plays a crucial role in integrating disaster risk reduction with conflict prevention efforts, promoting community resilience, and facilitating dialogue among conflicting parties. Using a mixed-methods approach, the study utilized both primary and secondary data sources. A total of 380 participants, including 127 women, took part in key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and survey questionnaires. Secondary data sources, particularly relevant policy, administrative, and local security reports, were also reviewed. Qualitative data were thematically coded and analyzed, while quantitative data were processed using descriptive and inferential statistics via SPSS version 20. The findings indicate that ‘traditional’ conflict resolution mechanisms, particularly the Gadaa and Shimglina institutions, were found relatively effective in mitigating and resolving conflicts between the Oromo and Amhara communities in Ataye. However, trust in the conflict resolution capacity of federal government institutions, particularly the House of Federation, is minimal, with nearly 59 percent of respondents doubting its effectiveness. Similarly, a significant number of participants believe that the conflict resolution capacity of the Ministry of Peace at the grassroots level is weak, with limited outreach and communication capacity to engage different community segments in conflict resolution efforts. The study further revealed that the local criminal justice system faces accountability and public trust deficits, indicating a pressing need for future reforms. It emphasizes the necessity for stronger institutional collaboration and synergy among ‘traditional’ conflict resolution organizations and formal government institutions, notably the Ministry of Peace and the DRM Council, at regional and district levels.
Read more