Excellims (United States)

Quantitation of the serum concentration of 25-hydroxyvitamin D is a high-demand assay that suffers from long chromatography time to separate 25-hydroxyvitamin D from its inactive epimer; however, ion mobility spectrometry can distinguish the epimer pair in under 30 ms due to the presence of a unique extended or "open" gas-phase sodiated conformer, not shared with the epimer, reducing the need for chromatographic separation. Five ion mobility mass spectrometers utilizing commercially available IMS technologies, including drift tube, traveling wave, trapped, and high-field asymmetric ion mobility spectrometry, are evaluated for their ability to resolve the unique open conformer. Additionally, settings for each instrument are evaluated to understand their influence on ion heating, which can drive the open conformer into a compact or "closed" conformer shared with the epimer. The four low-field instruments successfully resolved the open conformer from the closed conformer at baseline or near-baseline resolution at typical operating parameters. High-field asymmetric ion mobility was unable to resolve a unique peak but detected two peaks for the epimer, in contrast to the low-field methods that detected one conformer. This study seeks to expand the instrument space by highlighting the potential of each platform for the separation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D epimers.

Ammonium nitrate (AN) and urea nitrate (UN) are commonly used materials in improvised explosive devices (IEDs). Detection by mass spectrometry (MS) and/or ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) is traditionally difficult. The major challenges of detecting these species arise from their ionic nature and their low mass (for MS detection) and size (for IMS detection). Although AN and UN both produce characteristic higher mass (and size) cluster ions when ionized by electrospray ionization (ESI), detection of AN/UN using cluster ions poses difficulty at trace levels because their formation is concentration-dependent. The addition of modifiers to the ESI process is demonstrated here to overcome some of these challenges for the detection of AN and UN using MS and/or IMS.

Overlapping peaks interfere in ion mobility spectrometry (IMS), but they are separated introducing mobility shift reagents (SR) in the buffer gas forming adducts with different collision cross-sections (size). IMS separations using SR depend on the ion mobility shifts which are governed by adduct's size and interaction energies (stabilities). Mobility shifts of valinol and ethanolamine ions were measured by electrospray-ionization ion mobility-mass spectrometry (MS). Methyl-chloro propionate (M) was used as SR; 2-butanol (B) and nitrobenzene (N) were used for comparison. Density functional theory was used for calculations. B produced the smallest mobility shifts because of its small size. M and N have two strong interaction sites (oxygen atoms) and similar molecular mass, and they should produce similar shifts. For both ethanolamine and valinol ions, stabilities were larger for N adducts than those of M. With ethanolamine, M produced a 68% shift, large compared to that using N, 61%, because M has a third weak interaction site on the chlorine atom and, therefore, M has more interaction possibilities than N. This third site overrode the oxygen atoms' interaction energy that favored the adduction of ethanolamine with N over that with M. On the contrary, with valinol mobility shifts were larger with N than with M (21 vs 18%) because interaction energy favored even more adduction of valinol with N than with M; that is, the interaction energy difference between adducts of valinol with M and N was larger than that between those adducts with ethanolamine, and the third M interaction could not override this larger difference. Mobility shifts were explained based on the number of SR's interaction sites, size of ions and SR, and SR-ion interaction energies. This is the first time that the number of interaction sites is used to explain mobility shifts in SR-assisted IMS. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Several methods besides the conventional grind/lap/polish are available for working metal optics such as laser scanning polygons. Among the more interesting from a cost standpoint is the single point diamond-turned surface; in one operation an optically flat surface can be produced at an exact angle and position. A question remains, however: will the periodic machined grooves on the optical surface diffract sufficient light so as to distort the primary image formed by the optical system, and will the scattered light interfere with the function of the laser scanner to produce accurate, cosmetically acceptable images?