Fukui Prefectural Hospital

Background and AimsOzanimod is a once-daily, oral, selective sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 and 5 modulator. The objective of the randomized, phase 2/3 J-True North study (NCT03915769) was to assess the efficacy and safety of ozanimod in Japanese patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis.MethodsIn the 12-week induction period (IP), patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive placebo, ozanimod 0.46 mg, or ozanimod 0.92 mg. Patients who completed the IP with a clinical response at week (w) 12 were eligible to enter a 40-week maintenance period where they received the same treatment as they did in the IP. The primary endpoint was clinical response (complete Mayo score) at w12; clinical and mucosal secondary endpoints were assessed at w12 and w52.ResultsOf 198 patients randomized, 176 completed the IP. Of these patients, 97 entered and 77 completed the maintenance period. A significantly higher proportion of patients receiving ozanimod achieved clinical response at w12 versus placebo (ozanimod 0.46 mg: 52.9%, P = .0158; ozanimod 0.92 mg: 61.5%, P = .0006; vs placebo: 32.3%). Similar results were observed in the secondary endpoints where patients receiving ozanimod achieved higher rates of clinical remission, endoscopic improvement, and mucosal healing at w12 than those receiving placebo. Efficacy was maintained at w52 for all endpoints. Both doses of ozanimod were well tolerated, with no unexpected safety signals.ConclusionThis large-scale clinical trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of once-daily oral ozanimod in Japanese patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. This is the first time that the efficacy and safety of ozanimod were verified in a large number of patients in Asia.

Enteral nutrition (EN) has been reported to have some physiological importance for critically ill patients. However, the advantage of EN over parenteral nutrition remains controversial in recent paradigms. To maximize the benefits and efficiency of EN, implementing measures based on comprehensive evidence is essential. Here, we systematically reviewed EN-related studies and integrated them into the best and most up-to-date EN practices. We extracted studies from 13 systematic reviews during the development of Japanese Critical Care Nutrition Guidelines, summarizing findings on the assessment of enteral feeding intolerance (EFI), the timing of EN, formula composition and nutrients, and method of administration in critically ill adult patients. Multifaceted EFI assessment may be needed in patients for high-risk patients. Early EN may reduce infectious complications, and initiating EN even earlier may offer an additional advantage. High protein intake (≥1.2 g/kg/day) could maintain muscle mass and physical function without increasing gastrointestinal complications. Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics may serve as beneficial options for preventing infection and gastrointestinal complications, although their efficacy depends on the strains, types, and combinations used. For patients with EFI, post-pyloric feeding could be an effective approach, while intermittent feeding may be a safer approach. Both methods should be utilized to achieve nutritional targets. Integrating these nutritional interventions into EN strategies may help maximize their effectiveness and minimize complications. However, careful consideration regarding timing, dosage, nutrient selection, administration methods, and patient selection is required.

Nutritional status is an important factor influencing toxicity of treatment. Nutritional assessment indicators such as the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score and modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) have been reported to be associated with treatment-related adverse events (AEs) for various malignancies. However, there are no reports investigating the relationship between nutritional status and AEs from poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi), which are widely used in recent years as maintenance therapy for ovarian cancer. The primary objective was to investigate the usefulness of nutritional assessment indicators in predicting treatment discontinuation due to AEs from PARPi. This multicenter retrospective study included patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer who received maintenance therapy with PARPi from January 2018 to December 2023. PNI, CONUT score, and mGPS were calculated based on hematological parameters measured within 7 days before the start of PARPi therapy. A total of 272 patients received maintenance therapy with PARPi during the period, but due to the absence of the blood collection of albumin levels within one week or other exclusion criteria, 71 patients were finally included in this analysis. AEs were seen in 59 patients (83.1%), including 25 (35.2%) severe events (grade ≥3 in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0). Eighteen patients (25.4%) discontinued treatment due to PARPi-related AEs. Low PNI (<48.44) and high mGPS (≥1) were predictors of treatment discontinuation in both univariate and multivariate analyses. CONUT was not a significant predictor in this study. Our study suggested that PNI and mGPS can predict the risk of treatment discontinuation due to PARPi-related AEs before starting maintenance therapy. This insight opens avenues for more personalized treatment plans, potentially improving patient outcomes.

Introduction: A prospective study was started in May 2016 to evaluate the efficacy and safety of particle therapy for intrahepatic cholangial carcinoma (ICC). To compare treatment modalities, we also conducted a meta-analysis of literature data and a systematic comparison using registry data. Methods: Patients who received particle therapy for ICC from May 2016 to June 2018 were registered. Nineteen manuscripts (4 particle therapy, 8 3D-CRT, 7 SBRT) were selected for the meta-analysis. Results: A total of 85 cases (proton beam therapy 59, carbon therapy 26) were registered. The median overall survival (OS) of the 85 patients was 22.1 months (95% CI: 12.9–31.3); the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates were 70.9% (95% CI: 61.1–80.7%), 47.6% (36.8–58.4%), 37.7% (26.7–48.7%), and 22.7% (10.2–35.2%), respectively; and the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year local recurrence rates were 8.2% (1.1–15.3%), 21.6% (9.3–33.9%), 33.4% (16.7–50.1%), and 33.4% (16.7–50.1%), respectively. In the meta-analysis and registry data, the 1-year OS for particle therapy, SBRT and 3D-CRT were 71.8% (95% CI: 64.6–77.8%), 59.2% (53.0–64.9%, p = 0.0573), and 47.2% (36.8–56.9%, p = 0.0004), respectively. The incidence of grade 3 or higher late non-hematological toxicity in the meta-analysis and registry data were 7.4–12% for particle therapy, 6.7–16.7% for SBRT, and 8.1–14.3% for 3D-CRT. Conclusions: Particle therapy achieved a good therapeutic effect for ICC, and a meta-analysis indicated that particle therapy is a better treatment modality than SBRT and 3D-CRT.

In sepsis treatment, antibiotics are crucial, but overuse risks development of antibiotic resistance. Recent guidelines recommended the use of procalcitonin to guide antibiotic cessation, but solid evidence is insufficient. Recently, concerns were raised that this strategy would increase recurrence. Additionally, optimal protocol or difference from the commonly used C-reactive protein (CRP) are uncertain. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of procalcitonin- or CRP-guided antibiotic cessation strategies with standard of care in sepsis. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Igaku Chuo Zasshi, ClinicalTrials.gov , and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Platform. Randomized controlled trials involving adults with sepsis in intensive care. A systematic review with network meta-analyses was performed. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessments, Developments, and Evaluation method was used to assess certainty. Eighteen studies involving 5023 participants were included. Procalcitonin-guided and CRP-guided strategies shortened antibiotic treatment (-1.89 days [95% CI, -2.30 to -1.47], -2.56 days [95% CI, -4.21 to -0.91]) with low- to moderate-certainty evidence. In procalcitonin-guided strategies, this benefit was consistent even in subsets with shorter baseline antimicrobial duration (7-10 d) or in Sepsis-3, and more pronounced in procalcitonin cutoff of "0.5 μg/L and 80% reduction." No benefit was observed when monitoring frequency was less than half of the initial 10 days. Procalcitonin-guided strategies lowered mortality (-27 per 1000 participants [95% CI, -45 to -7]) and this was pronounced in Sepsis-3, but CRP-guided strategies led to no difference in mortality. Recurrence did not increase significantly with either strategy (very low to low certainty). In sepsis, procalcitonin- or CRP-guided antibiotic discontinuation strategies may be beneficial and safe. In particular, the usefulness of procalcitonin guidance for current Sepsis-3, where antimicrobials are used for more than 7 days, was supported. Well-designed studies are needed focusing on monitoring protocol and recurrence.

Advanced Renal Pelvic Tumor Diagnosed after Resection of a Solitary Subcutaneous Metastasis: A Case Report.

A gastric inlet patch (GIP) is an ectopic gastric mucosal lesion usually arising at the cervical esophagus that may rarely cause esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of a GIP-derived EAC that was successfully treated using a multidisciplinary treatment approach. A 64-year-old man was referred to the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanazawa University Hospital (Kanazawa, Japan) for surgical treatment of refractory recurrent cervical EAC derived from GIP who had previously been treated with induction chemotherapy, definitive chemoradiotherapy and photodynamic therapy (PDT). Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a stenotic tumor at the GIP site in the cervical esophagus and submucosal tumors with suspected multiple intramural metastases in the anal side of the thoracic esophagus. The patient underwent robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy with laryngopharyngectomy and cervical lymphadenectomy as radical salvage surgery 4 months after the last PDT procedure. After postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy using oral administration of tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (oral 5-fluorouracil prodrug) for 1 year; at present, the patient is alive without recurrence 3 years after the operation.

BackgroundPrevious studies have revealed an association between probiotic use and effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors in renal and lung cancers. However, little is known regarding other cancers, including gastrointestinal cancer.MethodsTo address this issue, we conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study and the duration of nivolumab treatment for various cancers was compared between probiotic users and non‐users.Results and ConclusionsIn total, 488 patients who received nivolumab therapy were included. In all cancers, no significant differences in treatment duration of nivolumab were observed between probiotic users and non‐users (median 62.0 vs. 56.0, hazard ratio = 1.02, p = 0.825), whereas probiotic use, compared with non‐use, in patients with gastric cancer was significantly associated with a longer duration of nivolumab treatment (55.0 vs. 31.0 days, hazard ratio = 0.69, p = 0.039). In conclusion, probiotics may improve the response to nivolumab and potentially prolong progression‐free survival in patients with gastric cancer.

Abstract We reviewed the outcomes of glioma patients enrolled in a prospective observational registry study of proton beam therapy (PBT) in Japan. The inclusion criteria were glioma patients registered in the Electronic Data Capture system, the Proton-net, between May 2016 and July 2019. Data on patient characteristics, treatments, late adverse events, survival status, recurrence and secondary tumors were extracted and statistically analyzed. The primary endpoint was the overall survival (OS) rate, and the secondary endpoints were the progression-free survival (PFS) rate and cumulative local recurrence rate (cLRR). Of the 65 primary brain tumor patients registered, 29 glioma patients from eight of 19 PBT facilities met the inclusion criteria. There were 19 glioblastoma patients, eight of other malignant gliomas, and two of low-grade gliomas. For glioblastomas, with a median follow-up period of 16 months, the median survival time was 21.2 months and the OS at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years were 77.4%, 44.9%, 23.9% and 23.9%, respectively. The median PFS period was 10.1 months, the 1, 2, 3 and 4-year PFS were 32.4%, 19.4%, 9.7% and 9.7%, respectively. The 1, 2, 3 and 4-year cLRR were 56.1%, 68.8%, 78.4 and 78.4%, respectively. Grade 3 brain necrosis was observed in two patients. No secondary tumor was observed. This is the first report on the current status of PBT for gliomas in Japan. For glioblastomas, the outcomes of PBT are estimated to be equivalent to historical data of photon therapy. The results of a prospective comparative evaluation of PBT and photon therapy are awaited.