P0231 The novel TOpClass classification system for non-fistulising perianal Crohn’s disease: Systematic review and modified nominal group technique expert consensus process
Abstract Background Perianal Crohn’s disease (pCD) is a challenging form of Crohn’s disease, which includes both fistulising and non-fistulising features, such as anorectal stricture, skin tags and erosive disease (1). Whilst non-fistulising pCD (nfpCD) can result in a significant disease burden for patients, these features are under-recognised in clinical practice, current guidelines and clinical research relating to pCD (2,3). Informed by a review of existing classification systems, this study aimed to develop a novel classification system to guide identification and management of non-fistulising pCD. Methods Following a systematic review to identify existing classification systems, a modified nominal group technique expert consensus process was used to develop a novel classification system for non-fistulising pCD. This process involved several phases including ideas generation, clarification of ideas, several rounds of voting and patient and public involvement (PPI). Results Twenty-two existing classification systems for non-fistulising pCD were identified, the majority (18/22, 88%) of which focused on categorising non-fistulising pCD. Participating panellists included multidisciplinary experts from the TOpClass consortium, with representation from 10 countries. The initial round of voting established a need for a novel classification system (n = 18 89% [A+], 11% [A]), and passed a number of statements relating to the content of the classification. The final classification structure was passed with 100% consensus (n = 27, 93%,[A+], 7% [A]) (Figure 1). The final statements to accompany the classification were passed with a mean 98% consensus (n = 28, 80% [A+], 18% [A]) (Table 1). The novel structure classifies nfpCD according to the presence of stricturing disease, erosive disease and skin tags with severity ranging from minimal symptoms (Class 1) to severe symptoms requiring defunctioning ostomy (Class 2c), proctectomy (Class 3) or perineal symptoms after proctectomy (Class 4). The structure complements the existing TOpClass classification for fistulising pCD, to enable classification of patients with both fistulising and non-fistulising features of pCD. The classification system incorporates patient goals and symptom burden, and introduces a number of novel concepts, such as velocity and destruction to provide a clinically useful framework. Conclusion This expert consensus has developed a dynamic, comprehensive and patient-focused system for optimising the classification of patients with non-fistulising pCD for clinical and research use. Further validation in prospective cohorts is planned to ensure clinical applicability.
Read more