Dr. Erbudak's essay offers an attempt to use statistics regarding the use of symmetry to distinguish among different cultural traditions in Iran and neighboring regions "with regard to the invading hordes up to the beginning of the 16th century, after which, due to the mobility of peoples, there is an intense mixing of artistic practice" (Introduction). The author's stated goal is to "examine the symmetry used in the ornamentation of various medieval civilizations and interpret it as a characteristic feature of each cultural group," and the cultural groups he enumerates in the abstract are Persians, Seljuks, Arabs, Greco-Roman (including Armenian, Eastern Roman Empire, and Kingdom of Andalusia). These categories span a very broad geographic area from Spain to Central Asia, with cultural categories reflecting different time periods (Seljuk and Arab being after the Arab conquests and the advent of Islam). The last category, Greco-Roman, is a jumble of geography and times from antiquity to the late 15th century. From my disciplinary perspective (history of art), which itself is interdisciplinary, relying upon history, cultural anthropology, and philosophy to a certain extent, this article is lacking in several respects. The first sentence mentions nomadism, but by the author's definition, colonial expansion is included without any consideration of various disciplinary approaches to the study of nomadism; for example, recently, D. T. Potts, Nomadism in Iran: From Antiquity to the Modern Era (2014). For a broader anthropological consideration, see T. J. Barfield, The Nomadic Alternative (1993). Since this is not germane to the author's intent, I would either omit the term "nomadism" at the start as too problematic, or dramatically expand the author's intent with the exposition of a theoretical foundation regarding nomadism and the movement of peoples (a subject, indeed, very pertinent to the topic of Iran, including Persian art, but likely not relevant to this article). I suggest beginning this paragraph, "Persia is located in the middle of the Silk Road…" and omitting the sentences above that. To conclude that Persian art neither "exerted nor received influence" (Conclusion, first para) runs counter to what we know of Persian art. For the Achaemenid period alone, see C. Nylander, Ionians in Pasargadae (1970), M. C. Root, The
Read more