Harvard Eye Associates

Transient pain and ocular inflammation may occur with ophthalmic surgery. Pain is an important determinant of patient satisfaction, and inflammation can increase the risk for suboptimal visual outcomes. Topical anti-inflammatory therapies can reduce the incidence of postoperative pain and inflammation but have many limitations, including nonadherence and significant potential side effects such as cataract formation and intraocular pressure elevation. There is unmet need for a therapy that provides anti-inflammatory and analgesic activity while overcoming the limitations of topical therapy. The intracanalicular dexamethasone insert (DEX) overcomes many of the limitations of topical therapy. DEX is a fluorescent yellow cylindrical-shaped polyethylene glycol-based hydrogel insert incorporating 0.4mg preservative-free dexamethasone. The insert was designed based on human anatomy and measurements of the canalicular system and continuously releases a tapered dose of dexamethasone over approximately 30days onto the surface of the eye. The insert is completely resorbable and does not require removal. DEX was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of pain (in 2018) and inflammation (in 2019) following ocular surgery; in 2021, the treatment of ocular itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis was added as an indication. We present a comprehensive review of the current therapeutic landscape for management of postoperative pain and inflammation following cataract surgery, including the limitations of topical eye drop medications. We review data from the key phase2 and 3 clinical trials that supported the approval and label expansion for DEX. We also summarize the broader literature of smaller studies evaluating the role of DEX in controlling postoperative pain and inflammation for a variety of ophthalmic surgery beyond cataract surgery as well as in management of ocular itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis.

To evaluate clinical efficacy and patient preference for a dropless treatment regimen compared to conventional topical therapy in patients undergoing cataract surgery. In this prospective, contralateral eye study, patients with bilateral cataract were randomized to receive either intracanalicular dexamethasone insert, intracameral phenylephrine 1%/ketorolac 0.3%, and intracameral moxifloxacin (50 µg) (study group) or topical moxifloxacin 0.5%, ketorolac 0.5%, and prednisolone acetate 1.0% QID (control group). The second eye underwent cataract surgery 2 weeks later and was treated with the opposite treatment. All patients were evaluated at Days 1, 7, 14, 28, and 3 months. The primary outcome measure was postoperative ocular pain. Secondary outcomes included summed ocular inflammation score (SOIS; the sum of the mean anterior chamber cells and anterior flare score), the patient preference for medication protocol between the two eyes, and patient out-of-pocket cost of medications. Safety outcome measures included CDVA, intraocular pressure, central retinal thickness (CRT), and the incidence of reported AEs. The proportion of patients with no pain was similar in both groups at all postoperative visits (p>0.05). No statistically significant difference in SOIS score was observed between the two groups at any visit. A strong majority of the patients (94.7%) preferred the study eye's dropless regimen over the control eye's conventional topical therapy regimen. No statistically significant difference in mean intraocular pressure (IOP) was observed at any postoperative visit, except at Week 1. The mean CDVA was also similar in both groups at all postoperative visits (p>0.05). The postoperative mean CRT was comparable between the two groups. A dropless treatment regimen is as effective as topical eyedrop administration. A higher proportion of patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery preferred the dropless treatment regimen over the patient-administered eye drop regimen.

There exists a paucity of information on the pathogenesis of pterygium, a benign ocular tumor that scars the cornea and can lead to vision loss. The main recourse for pterygium is surgery; however, recurrence is observed. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are involved in the pathology of pterygium. The determination of the specific MMP involved among the 24 human enzymes has not been established due to challenges in MMP profiling. We used an affinity resin that binds specifically to the active forms of MMPs in the complex mixture of the cellular proteome. The proteomics analysis identified active MMP-14 and three related metalloproteinases, ADAM9, ADAM10, and ADAM17, in human pterygia. Inhibition of MMP-14 with the small-molecule inhibitor (R)-ND-336 was assessed in cell migration and collagen contraction assays. (R)-ND-336 attenuated human conjunctiva fibroblast migration and mitigated collagen contraction, both activities required for the formation of pterygium. (R)-ND-336 holds the promise of a therapeutic recourse for pterygium as an orphan disease.

PurposeTo assess the frequency of patients reducing the use of artificial tears (ATs) among patients with dry eye disease (DED) following lifitegrast treatment.Patients and MethodsTwo independent analyses were performed using the data from the 1-year, randomized, multicenter, Phase 3 SONATA trial and a noninterventional, real-world evidence (RWE) study conducted in patients with DED who were treated with lifitegrast in the United States and Canada. In SONATA, patients who had used ATs in the lifitegrast and placebo groups were included. The RWE study reviewed patients’ electronic medical records, prescribing patterns, and practices of physicians throughout the survey. These data were then used to compare the proportion of patients using ATs in the 6-month pre-index period versus the 12-month post-index period.ResultsOf 293 patients (lifitegrast, n=195; placebo, n=98) from SONATA, 107 (lifitegrast, n=64; placebo, n=43) used ATs during the on-therapy period while 186 (lifitegrast, n=131; placebo, n=55) did not. Of those not using ATs, the proportion of patients in the lifitegrast group at any time was higher (~67% [n=131]) versus placebo (~56% [n=55]); this was the case at all study time-points (Days 90, 180, 270, and 360). The RWE study included 600 patient charts (US, n=550; Canada, n=50); 75.5% (n=453) reported AT use. There was ~40% decrease in the proportion of patients using ATs as adjunct DED therapy to lifitegrast in the post-index period (n=273) versus those in the pre-index period (n=453).ConclusionThe findings show that the reliance on AT use can be gradually reduced with lifitegrast treatment, eventually leading to a reduction in disease burden.

PurposeTo compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and satisfaction results after multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in three groups: two receiving bilateral implantation of the same IOL and another undergoing blended vision with two different multifocal IOLs.Patients and methodsA questionnaire was administered to patients who had undergone uncomplicated cataract surgery and 2 months of follow-up: the first group underwent bilateral implantation with Alcon’s AcrySof ReSTOR 3.0 lens (“3.0/3.0,” n=78); the second group underwent implantation with the ReSTOR ActiveFocus 2.5 or the ReSTOR ActiveFocus 2.5 toric lens (“2.5 mini-monovision,” n=102); and the third group underwent implantation with the ReSTOR 2.5 lens in the dominant eye and the ReSTOR 3.0 lens in the non-dominant eye (“2.5/3.0,” n=89).ResultsOverall PROs and satisfaction was similar among the groups. Refractive outcomes and accuracy were similar among the groups, but the 2.5 mini-monovision group reported better intermediate vision. Refractive outcome differences were not meaningful among the groups and were not a differentiating factor in PROs. Substantially fewer patients in the 2.5 mini-monovision group noticed glare and halo compared with the 3.0/3.0 group (P<0.0001, chi-square test). No new safety concerns were reported.ConclusionThe 2.5 mini-monovision results in a higher percentage of patients being satisfied with intermediate vision than bilateral ReSTOR 3.0 or blended vision with ReSTOR 2.5/3.0 implants, but overall PRO differences were not statistically significant.

IntroductionThe study objective was to evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP) and medication-lowering effect of 2 second-generation trabecular micro-bypass stents in eyes with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) on one preoperative medication.MethodsFifty-seven qualified phakic eyes with OAG on 1 medication, preoperative medicated IOP of 18–30 mmHg, and preoperative unmedicated (post-washout) IOP of 22–38 mmHg underwent implantation of 2 second-generation trabecular micro-bypass stents in a standalone procedure. Evaluations included IOP, best-corrected visual acuity, medication use, fundus and slit lamp examinations, visual field, cup to disc ratio, pachymetry, and complications and interventions. Subjects have been followed for 18 months, and follow-up is ongoing.ResultsAt Month 12 postoperative, 100% of eyes had achieved an IOP reduction ≥20% (100% had IOP ≤18 mmHg and 67% had IOP ≤15 mmHg) without medication versus preoperative unmedicated IOP, and 75% had IOP reduction ≥20% without medication versus preoperative medicated IOP. The Month 12 mean unmedicated IOP had decreased by 42%, to 14.2 ± 1.9 mmHg vs 24.4 ± 1.3 mmHg preoperatively, and this reduction was maintained through 18 months (14.4 ± 2.1 mmHg). A high safety profile was observed.ConclusionIn this prospective, open-label, single-arm study, the standalone implantation of two second-generation trabecular micro-bypass stents in OAG patients on 1 preoperative medication resulted in IOP reduction to ≤15 mmHg and elimination of medication through 18 months, with favorable safety.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02868190.FundingGlaukos Corporation, San Clemente, CA.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12325-016-0420-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Pterygium, a sun-related eye disease, presents as wing-shaped ocular surface lesions that extend from the bulbar conjunctiva onto the cornea, most commonly on the nasal side. Pterygia show characteristic histological features that suggest that inflammation plays a prominent role in their initial pathogenesis and recurrence. Appropriate surgery is the key to successful treatment of pterygia, but there is also a rationale for the use of anti-inflammatory agents to reduce the rate of recurrence following surgery. Multiple surgical techniques have been developed over the last two millennia, but these initially had little success, due to high rates of recurrence. Current management strategies, associated with lower recurrence rates, include bare sclera excision and various types of grafts using tissue glues. Adjunctive therapies include mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil, as well as the topical ocular steroid loteprednol etabonate, which has been shown to have a lower risk of elevated intraocular pressure than have the other topical ocular steroids. Here, the surgical management of pterygium is presented from a historical perspective, and current management techniques, including the appropriate use of various adjunctive therapies, are reviewed, along with an illustrative case presentation and a discussion of the conjunctival forceps designed to facilitate surgical management. Despite thousands of years of experience with this condition, there remains a need for a more thorough understanding of pterygium and interventions to reduce both its incidence and postsurgical recurrence. Until that time, the immediate goal is to optimize surgical practices to ensure the best possible outcomes. Loteprednol etabonate, especially the ointment formulation, appears to be a safe and effective component of the perioperative regimen for this complex ocular condition, although confirmatory prospective studies are needed.