Holy Innocents Children's Hospital

Although COVID-19 prevention measures played an important role in containing the pandemic, they had unintended consequences especially among vulnerable populations. This formative research sought to explore the impact of COVID-19 on women and youth in the Nakivale Refugee Settlement (NRS), Uganda. In this mixed-methods study, we administered surveys to 258 women and youth aged 15–35 years from NRS to capture data including food insecurity, asset index, financial support and social support. We conducted four focus group discussions (FGDs) with 40 purposively selected participants composed of women, youth and leaders. Quantitative data were descriptively analysed using STATA 13. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. Participants reported severe food insecurity ( n = 242, 90%), probable depression ( n = 129, 50%), low social-economic status ( n = 136, 54%), loss of employment/income ( n = 204, 79%), saving ( n = 203, 78%), assets ( n = 202, 78%) and financial support ( n = 210, 81%). Results from FGDs indicate that COVID-19 resulted in significant losses in human, social, natural, physical and financial capital among refugee women and youth. Future emergency response strategies should be designed based on the differentiated needs of vulnerable women and youth focusing on ensuring continuous access to essential services such as inclusive and gender-sensitive access to health, education and livelihood services.

Abstract Introduction Post-discharge mortality among children following an acute illness in low-resource settings is high and demands urgent attention. We aimed to assess the impact of Smart Discharges, a mortality prevention risk-differentiated approach to peri-discharge care among children under five years admitted with suspected sepsis. Methods We conducted a before-after two-phase study with staggered implementation at six hospitals in Uganda. During a baseline period (Phase-1), clinical prediction algorithms for post-discharge mortality were developed based on clinical and socio-demographic data collected at hospital admission. Outcomes, primarily mortality within six months of discharge, were compared against an interventional period (Phase-2). In the Smart Discharges intervention each family was given soap, a mosquito net, their risk category (low/medium/high/very high), counselling, and educational materials regardless of risk stratification, after which the intensity of recommended follow-up care was determined by age (0-6, 6-60 months) and predicted post-discharge mortality risk. Results Overall, 13,051 children were enrolled: Phase-1, n=6,955; Phase-2, n=6,096. Characteristics were similar between groups, including mean predicted post-discharge mortality risk (6.3% Phase-1 vs. 5.9% Phase-2). With Smart Discharges, 2,331/3,891 (59.9%) medium/high/very high-risk families attending all their scheduled visits. The observed post-discharge mortality rate was 439 (6.3%) in Phase-1 vs. 296 (4.9%) in Phase-2; adjusted hazard ratio 0.77 (95%CI 0.67 to 0.90) favouring the intervention. In Phase-1, 1,313 (18.9%) children were re-admitted to hospital vs. 1,024 (16.8%) in Phase-2. Conclusion A simple approach of risk assessment paired with education and engagement through scheduled follow-up after discharge is an appropriate strategy to improve child survival in low-resource settings.

BackgroundIn low-resource settings, limited laboratory capacity adds to the burden of central nervous system (CNS) infections in children and spurs overuse of antibiotics. The commercially available BioFire® FilmArray® Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel (FA-ME) with its capability to simultaneously detect 14 pathogens in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), could potentially narrow such a diagnostic gap.MethodsIn Mbarara, Uganda, we compared clinical utility (clinical turnaround time [cTAT], microbial yield, and influence on patient outcome and antibiotic exposure) of FA-ME with bacterial culture, in children 0–12 years with suspected CNS infection.ResultsOf 212 enrolled children, CSF was sampled from 194. All samples underwent bacterial culture, of which 193 also underwent FA-ME analyses. FA-ME analyses prospectively influenced care for 169 of the 193 patients, and they constituted an ‘Index group’. The remaining 43/212 patients constituted a ‘Reference group’. Of all 194 CSF-sampled patients, 87% (168) had received antibiotics before lumbar puncture. Median cTAT for FA-ME was 4.2 h, vs. two days for culture. Bacterial yield was 12% (24/193) and 1.5% (3/194) for FA-ME and culture, respectively. FA-ME viral yield was 12% (23/193). Fatality rate was 14% in the Index group vs. 19% in the Reference group (P = 0.20). From clinician receival of FA-ME results, median antibiotic exposure was 6 days for bacteria-negative vs. 13 days for bacteria-positive patients (P = 0.03). Median hospitalization duration was 7 vs. 12 days for FA-ME negative and positive patients, respectively (P < 0.01).ConclusionsIn this setting, clinical FA-ME utility was found in a higher and faster microbial yield and shortened hospitalization and antibiotic exposure of patients without CSF pathology. More epidemiologically customized pathogen panels may increase FA-ME utility locally, although its use in similar settings would require major cost reductions.Trial registrationThe trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03900091) in March 2019, and its protocol was published in November 2020.

BackgroundSeizure control among children with epilepsy (CWE) receiving anti-seizure medications (ASMs) remains a challenge in low-resource settings. Uncontrolled seizures are significantly associated with increased morbidity and mortality among CWE. This negatively impacts their quality of life and increases stigma.AimThis study determined seizure control status and described the factors associated among CWE receiving ASMs at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH).MethodsIn a retrospective chart review study, socio-demographic and clinical data were obtained from 112 medical records. CWE receiving ASMs for at least six months and regularly attending the clinic were included in the study. Physical or telephone interviews were conducted with the immediate caregivers of the CWE to establish the current seizure control status of the participants.ResultsA total of 112 participants were enrolled. Of these, three-quarters had generalized onset seizures, 23% had focal onset seizures, while 2% had unknown onset motor seizures. About 60.4% of the study participants had poor seizure control. Having a comorbidity (p-value 0.048, AOR 3.2 (95% CI 1.0–9.9)), history suggestive of birth asphyxia (p-value 0.014, AOR 17.8 (95% CI 1.8–176.8)), and being an adolescent (p-value 0.006, AOR 6.8 (95% CI 1.8–26.6)) were significantly associated with poor seizure control.ConclusionSeizure control among CWE receiving ASMs at MRRH remains poor. Efforts geared to addressing seizure control and optimizing drugs are needed, especially among children with comorbidities, those with history of birth asphyxia, and adolescents.

BackgroundSepsis is the leading cause of death in children under five in low- and middle-income countries. The rapid identification of the sickest children and timely antibiotic administration may improve outcomes. We developed and implemented a digital triage platform to rapidly identify critically ill children to facilitate timely intravenous antibiotic administration.ObjectiveThis quality improvement initiative sought to reduce the time to antibiotic administration at a dedicated children’s hospital outpatient department in Mbarara, Uganda.Intervention and study designThe digital platform consisted of a mobile application that collects clinical signs, symptoms, and vital signs to prioritize children through a combination of emergency triggers and predictive risk algorithms. A computer-based dashboard enabled the prioritization of children by displaying an overview of all children and their triage categories. We evaluated the impact of the digital triage platform over an 11-week pre-implementation phase and an 11-week post-implementation phase. The time from the end of triage to antibiotic administration was compared to evaluate the quality improvement initiative.ResultsThere was a difference of -11 minutes (95% CI, -16.0 to -6.0; p < 0.001; Mann-Whitney U test) in time to antibiotics, from 51 minutes (IQR, 27.0–94.0) pre-implementation to 44 minutes (IQR, 19.0–74.0) post-implementation. Children prioritized as emergency received the greatest time benefit (-34 minutes; 95% CI, -9.0 to -58.0; p < 0.001; Mann-Whitney U test). The proportion of children who waited more than an hour until antibiotics decreased by 21.4% (p = 0.007).ConclusionA data-driven patient prioritization and continuous feedback for healthcare workers enabled by a digital triage platform led to expedited antibiotic therapy for critically ill children with sepsis. This platform may have a more significant impact in facilities without existing triage processes and prioritization of treatments, as is commonly encountered in low resource settings.