MicroTransponder (United States)

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE:Given advances in neuromodulation to improve health and function for those with chronic conditions, the implantation of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) or other neuromodulation devices with existing cardiac devices, such as pacemakers in this report, presents unique challenges due to the safety concerns of potential device interactions or interference.CLINICAL PRESENTATION:An 83-year-old man, 6 months postischemic stroke and upper extremity weakness, presented for surgical evaluation for the implantation of a Vivistim Paired VNS System to assist with stroke recovery. The patient had a history of myocardial infarction 3 years ago with subsequent dual chamber pacemaker implantation. We implemented a three-phase protocol that included worst-case test scenarios during preoperative and intraoperative testing and then long-term follow-up.CONCLUSION:Use of a rigorous test protocol confirmed that VNS did not interfere with proper cardiac pacemaker operation. Preoperative testing, intraoperative testing, and a follow-up at 6 months confirmed the absence of potential safety events associated with device interactions.

BackgroundCurative responses to immunotherapy require the generation of robust systemic immunity with limited toxicity. Recruitment of T cell populations such as precursor exhausted T cells (Tpex) from lymphoid tissues to tumors is a hallmark of effective treatment. However, the ability to efficiently induce this recruitment is lacking in current immunotherapy approaches. Furthermore, systemic administration of immunotherapies frequently results in dose-limiting toxicities, yielding an inadequate therapeutic window for eliciting durable responses.MethodsIn this investigation, we evaluated the safety and antitumor efficacy of locally administered interleukin 12 (IL-12) using a clinically translatable cytokine delivery platform (NCT05538624) to identify Tpex recruitment capabilities at tolerable cytokine doses.ResultsWe show IL-12 cytokine factories can effectively treat a broad spectrum of cancer types. Single-cell RNA sequencing data suggests that the antitumor efficacy seen in our studies was due to retinal pigmented epithelial cells-mIL12 treatment inducing differentiation of Tpex cells within the tumor microenvironment. When administered in combination with checkpoint therapy, IL-12 cytokine factory treatment generated systemic abscopal immunity, preventing subcutaneous tumor outgrowth in 8/9 mice with colorectal cancer and lung metastasis in mice with melanoma. Furthermore, this platform was well tolerated in a non-human primate without signs of toxicity.ConclusionsOur new immunotherapy approach provides a robust strategy for inducing Tpex recruitment and systemic immunity against a range of solid peritoneal malignancies, many incurable with current immunotherapy strategies. Notably, these features were achieved using IL-12, and by leveraging our technology, we avoided the toxicities that have prevented the translation of IL-12 to the clinic. Our findings provide a strong rationale for the clinical development of IL-12 cytokine factories.

We perform diverse experimental validation of an optical spectrum analysis GOSNR estimation method, showing good agreement (typically within 0.5 dB) relative to the conventional transceiver-based method over metro and long-haul distances and two fiber types.

Background Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) paired with rehabilitation improved upper extremity impairment and function in a recent pivotal, randomized, triple-blind, sham-controlled trial in people with chronic arm weakness after stroke. Objective We aimed to determine whether treatment effects varied across candidate subgroups, such as younger age or less injury. Methods Participants were randomized to receive rehabilitation paired with active VNS or rehabilitation paired with sham stimulation (Control). The primary outcome was the change in impairment measured by the Fugl–Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score on the first day after completion of 6-weeks in-clinic therapy. We explored the effect of VNS treatment by sex, age (≥62 years), time from stroke (>2 years), severity (baseline FMA-UE score >34), paretic side of body, country of enrollment (USA vs UK) and presence of cortical involvement of the index infarction. We assessed whether there was any interaction with treatment. Findings The primary outcome increased by 5.0 points (SD 4.4) in the VNS group and by 2.4 points (SD 3.8) in the Control group (P = .001, between group difference 2.6, 95% CI 1.03-4.2). The between group difference was similar across all subgroups and there were no significant treatment interactions. There was no important difference in rates of adverse events across subgroups. Conclusion The response was similar across subgroups examined. The findings suggest that the effects of paired VNS observed in the VNS-REHAB trial are likely to be consistent in wide range of stroke survivors with moderate to severe upper extremity impairment.

Background: Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) paired with rehabilitation improved upper extremity impairment and function in a recent pivotal, randomised, blinded, sham-controlled trial. Here we report post-hoc sub-group analyses from the VNS Rehab trial. We aimed to determine whether treatment effects were consistent across subgroups. Methods: VNS Rehab included 108 participants with moderate to severe arm /hand weakness, at least nine months after ischaemic stroke. They were randomised to receive rehabilitation paired with active VNS or rehabilitation paired with sham stimulation (Control). The primary outcome was the change in iFugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score on the first day after completion of in-clinic therapy. The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03131960). We explored the effect of VNS treatment by sex (n=70 males; n=38 females), age (≤ 65 or >65 years)), time from stroke (median time, 2 years) and baseline FMA-UE score (<=33 severe, >33 moderate). We assessed whether there was any interaction with treatment. No hypotheses were specified prior to this analysis and no formal adjustment was made for multiplicity. Findings: On the first day after completion of in-clinic therapy, the mean (±SD) FMA-UE score increased by 5.0 points (SD 4.4) in the VNS group and by 2.4 points (SD 3.8) in the Control group (p=0.001, between group difference 2.6, 95% CI 1.03 to 4.2). The between group difference was similar across all subgroups (figure). No significant treatment interactions were observed with baseline characteristics. Interpretation: Participants with moderate to severe arm and hand impairment after ischaemic stroke showed clinically meaningful improvements in motor impairment and function with rehabilitation paired with VNS compared to rehabilitation with sham VNS. The response appeared similar across pre-defined subgroups of interest.

Code and data used in the theoretical model of intraperitoneal cytokine delivery used in the publication.

Background and Purpose- We assessed safety, feasibility, and potential effects of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with rehabilitation for improving arm function after chronic stroke. Methods- We performed a randomized, multisite, double-blinded, sham-controlled pilot study. All participants were implanted with a VNS device and received 6-week in-clinic rehabilitation followed by a home exercise program. Randomization was to active VNS (n=8) or control VNS (n=9) paired with rehabilitation. Outcomes were assessed at days 1, 30, and 90 post-completion of in-clinic therapy. Results- All participants completed the course of therapy. There were 3 serious adverse events related to surgery. Average FMA-UE scores increased 7.6 with active VNS and 5.3 points with control at day 1 post-in-clinic therapy (difference, 2.3 points; CI, -1.8 to 6.4; P=0.20). At day 90, mean scores increased 9.5 points from baseline with active VNS, and the control scores improved by 3.8 (difference, 5.7 points; CI, -1.4 to 11.5; P=0.055). The clinically meaningful response rate of FMA-UE at day 90 was 88% with active VNS and 33% with control VNS ( P<0.05). Conclusions- VNS paired with rehabilitation was acceptably safe and feasible in participants with upper limb motor deficit after chronic ischemic stroke. A pivotal study of this therapy is justified. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02243020.

This research develops and evaluates an Analytic Network Process (ANP) model to choose the correct mode of global transportation in the presence of complicating qualitative influences. The ANP model effectively combines important qualitative and quantitative factors into a global modal choice model. Although there is a great deal of research in the area of modal choice, the research often focuses singularly on cost or time factors. This research incorporates security, public opinion, and customer opinion into modal choice. One of the most difficult choices a transportation planner faces is deciding when qualitative factors outweigh the quantitative ones. A reliable tool to validate choice by including the important qualitative factors with the quantitative is quite valuable in military operations, humanitarian support, and disaster relief.