Navigating Language Ideologies Through Translanguaging in EAL Classrooms of Pakistan: A Sociolinguistics Perspective
Language is a tool for instruction and expressing perspectives (Turetsky et al, 2021). This study aimed to explore the ideologies navigated through translanguaging in Pakistani institutions where English Language instruction is provided as an extra language (EAL). Following an exploratory sequential mixed method design, a survey of 31 items was administered to the language teachers n=100 after conducting non-participant observations of 480 minutes. For this study, the Ideological Model of Literacy (Curiel and Ponzio, 2021) was chosen as the conceptual framework. Observations revealed the involuntary navigation of primarily seven ideologies in the Pakistani classrooms. Quantitative data were analysed through SPSS 20.0, revealing that political ideologies and world Englishes ideologies secured the lowest average score of 2.34. However, racio-linguistic and English-only ideologies were averaged as 3.34. The results indicated that, in contrast, both multilingual ideologies and imperialistic ideologies had a higher mean score of 4.5. This study highlighted learners’ awareness of how their EAL instructors can navigate language ideologies through Translanguaging. References Aghai, L., Sayer, P., & Vercellotti, M. L. (2020). Effects of teachers’ language ideologies on language learners’ translanguaging practices in an intensive English program. In Envisioning TESOL through a translanguaging lens: Global perspectives (pp. 345–362). Agwu Udu, D., Nmadu, J., Uwaleke, C. C., Anudu, A. P., Chukwunonso Okechineke, B., Attamah, P. C., ... & Ogonna, O. C. (2022). Innovative pedagogy and improvement of students’ knowledge retention in science education: Learning activity package instructional approach. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 30(3). Ali, I., Azim, M. U., & Rehman, A. U. (2024). Translanguaging as a tool to decolonise English language teaching in Pakistan: Opportunities and challenges. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 8(1), 246–254. Al-Mutairi, M. A. (2020). Kachru’s three concentric circles model of English language: An overview of criticism & the place of Kuwait in it. English Language Teaching, 13(1), 85–88. Alsuwayhiri, M. M. (2024). The use of translation in English for specific academic purposes classes in Saudi Arabia (Doctoral dissertation, University of Glasgow). Atta, A. (2024). Prospective prognostication: An examination of translanguaging in Pakistan’s educational landscape through the lens of teachers’ and students’ perceptions. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241259640 Cárdenas Curiel, L., & Ponzio, C. M. (2021). Imagining multimodal and translanguaging possibilities for authentic cultural writing experiences. Journal of Multilingual Education Research, 11(1), 6. Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2021). Pedagogical Translanguaging. Cambridge University Press. Charalambous, P., Charalambous, C., & Zembylas, M. (2016). Troubling Translanguaging: Language ideologies, superdiversity and interethnic conflict. Applied Linguistics Review, 7(3), 327–352. Cushing, I. (2023). “Miss, can you speak English?”: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language oppression in initial teacher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 44(5), 896–911. Fang, F., Jiang, L., & Yang, J. (2023). To impart knowledge or to adhere to policy: Unpacking language ideologies and practices in Chinese EMI courses through a translanguaging lens. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231183771 Farahani, M. F., & Maleki, M. (2014). A survey on tendency toward curriculum ideologies among academic board members in educational sciences faculties – Tehran 2010–11. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2392–2396. Galloway, N., & Ruegg, R. (2020). The provision of student support on English medium instruction programmes in Japan and China. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 45, 100846. Henry, J. (2023). “Say a sentence”: Drawing an interactional link between organisations, language ideologies, and coloniality. Signs and Society, 11(1), 93–114. Hopf, A. (2023). Urdu language ideologies and Pakistani identity. In Language ideologies and the vernacular in colonial and postcolonial South Asia (pp. 34–56). Routledge India. Iversen, J. Y. (2021). Negotiating language ideologies: Pre-service teachers’ perspectives on multilingual practices in mainstream education. International Journal of Multilingualism, 18(3), 421–434. Kachru, B. B. (1996, November). Opening borders with world Englishes: Theory in the classroom. In On JALT96: Crossing borders. The proceedings of the 23rd annual JALT international conference on language teaching/learning, Hiroshima, Japan (pp. 10–20). Khan, I. U., Rahman, G., & Hamid, A. (2021). Poststructuralist perspectives on language and identity: Implications for English language teaching research in Pakistan. SJESR, 4(1), 257–267. Koyama, J., & Kasper, J. (2022). Transworlding and translanguaging: Negotiating and resisting monoglossic language ideologies, policies, and pedagogies. Linguistics and Education, 70, 101010. Mazak, C. M., & Herbas-Donoso, C. (2014). Translanguaging practices and language ideologies in Puerto Rican university science education. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 11(1), 27–49. Nadarajan, K., Abdullah, A. H., Alhassora, N. S. A., Ibrahim, N. H., Surif, J., Ali, D. F., ... & Hamzah, M. H. (2022). The effectiveness of a technology-based isometrical transformation flipped classroom learning strategy in improving students’ higher order thinking skills. IEEE Access, 11, 4155–4172. Naheed, M., Azim, M. U., Islam, M., & Imdad, K. (2024). Investigating the necessity of translanguaging in EFL classroom at university level: Perspective of teachers and students. Harf-o-Sukhan, 8(1), 474–487. Paulsrud, B., & Rosén, J. (2020). Translanguaging and language ideologies in education: Northern and Southern perspectives. In Handbook of the changing world language map (pp. 3533–3547). Sahan, K., Rose, H., Paulsrud, B., Tian, Z., & Toth, J. (2021). Problematising the E in EMI: Translanguaging as a pedagogic alternative to English-only hegemony in university contexts. In English-medium instruction and translanguaging (pp. 1–14). Sahar, Y., & Shahbaz, M. (2023). Scope of e-portfolio-based assessment tool: Perceptions and practices of ELT practitioners in Pakistan. International Journal of Innovation in Teaching and Learning (IJITL), 9(1), 75–90. Sahar, Y., Ali, M., & Hussain, M. S. (2024). Emergent bilingual learners’ target language development: A comparison between government policies and school practices. International Journal of Innovation in Teaching and Learning (IJITL), 10(1), 83–98. Strijker, D., Bosworth, G., & Bouter, G. (2020). Research methods in rural studies: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods. Journal of Rural Studies, 78, 262–270. Syed, H. (2022). “I make my students’ assignments bleed with red circles”: An autoethnography of translanguaging in higher education in Pakistan. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 42, 119–126. Syed, H. (2024). Unravelling the deficit ideologies in English language education in Pakistan: A decolonial perspective. TESOL Journal, e828. Turetsky, K. M., Sinclair, S., Starck, J. G., & Shelton, J. N. (2021). Beyond students: How teacher psychology shapes educational inequality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(8), 697–709. Uysal, H., & Sah, P. K. (2024). Language ideologies and language teaching in the global world: An introduction to the special issue. International Journal of Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069241240964 Wei, L., & García, O. (2022). Not a first language but one repertoire: Translanguaging as a decolonising project. RELC Journal, 53(2), 313–324.
Read more