Northwest Medical Specialties

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend tumor phenotyping for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 at initial breast cancer diagnosis, with repeat biopsy considered at disease progression. This study assessed the frequency, timing, regional variation, and predictors of repeat biopsies among patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) treated at community oncology practices in the United States. A weighted random sample of 911 mBC patients was selected from 15 practices within the ONCare Alliance network. The data included demographics, clinical characteristics, number and types of biopsies, and associated findings. Multivariate negative binomial regression, adjusted for disease duration, was used to identify predictors of biopsy frequency. Among the cohort, 42.2% had a history of early-stage disease, while 57.8% were diagnosed with de novo stage IV mBC. After adjusting for disease duration, patients with prior early-stage disease underwent significantly more biopsies (mean: 3.9; 95% CI: 3.7-4.0) than those with de novo mBC (mean: 2.2; 95% CI: 2.1-2.3; P<0.001). Factors associated with fewer biopsies included non-Black, non-Asian minority status (RR=0.80, P<0.001), longer time to metastatic progression (RR=0.93, P<0.001), poor performance status, and geographic region. A substantial proportion of patients with mBC, particularly those with de novo disease, did not undergo repeat biopsy at progression. These findings reveal disparities in biopsy practices and underscore the need for improved adherence to guideline-based care in community oncology settings.

Extended adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) beyond 5years (up to 10years) has been shown to be beneficial for some women with non-metastatic, hormone-receptor positive breast cancer. Much of our current understanding of adherence to and continuation with AET is derived from examining the 5years after AET initiation and is limited beyond the first 5years. To address this limitation, we conducted a retrospective cohort study examining AET adherence and time of continuation beyond 5years among a large, real-world population in Northern California. We evaluated adherence to and continuation of extended AET among a cohort of 13,675 women diagnosed with Stage I-III, estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer between 2008 and 2017 treated at Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Adherence (medication possession ratio > 80%) and discontinuation (last pill possession date before a 180-day gap) of AET were examined. Annual AET adherence declined gradually each year from 79% in year 1-60% in year 5 and dropped dramatically to 23% in year 6. Following year 6, annual adherence again declined gradually and was 10% in year 10. Similarly, there was a striking decline in AET continuation between year 5 (52%) and year 6 (20%). Only 4.5% continued to the end of year 10. We observed a dramatic drop in both adherence to and continuation with AET following year 5 into year 6. This potentially represents an inflection point for intervention to improve adherence to and continuation with extended AET among this patient population.

Limited information is available for patients with breast cancer (BC) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially among underrepresented racial/ethnic populations. This is a COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry-based retrospective cohort study of females with active or history of BC and laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection diagnosed between March 2020 and June 2021 in the US. Primary outcome was COVID-19 severity measured on a five-level ordinal scale, including none of the following complications, hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, and all-cause mortality. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression model identified characteristics associated with COVID-19 severity. 1383 female patient records with BC and COVID-19 were included in the analysis, the median age was 61 years, and median follow-up was 90 days. Multivariable analysis revealed higher odds of COVID-19 severity for older age (aOR per decade, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.32-1.67]); Black patients (aOR 1.74; 95 CI 1.24-2.45), Asian Americans and Pacific Islander patients (aOR 3.40; 95 CI 1.70-6.79) and Other (aOR 2.97; 95 CI 1.71-5.17) racial/ethnic groups; worse ECOG performance status (ECOG PS ≥2: aOR, 7.78 [95% CI, 4.83-12.5]); pre-existing cardiovascular (aOR, 2.26 [95% CI, 1.63-3.15])/pulmonary comorbidities (aOR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.20-2.29]); diabetes mellitus (aOR, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.66-3.04]); and active and progressing cancer (aOR, 12.5 [95% CI, 6.89-22.6]). Hispanic ethnicity, timing, and type of anti-cancer therapy modalities were not significantly associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes. The total all-cause mortality and hospitalization rate for the entire cohort was 9% and 37%, respectively however, it varied according to the BC disease status. Using one of the largest registries on cancer and COVID-19, we identified patient and BC-related factors associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, underrepresented racial/ethnic patients experienced worse outcomes compared to non-Hispanic White patients. This study was partly supported by National Cancer Institute grant number P30 CA068485 to Tianyi Sun, Sanjay Mishra, Benjamin French, Jeremy L Warner; P30-CA046592 to Christopher R Friese; P30 CA023100 for Rana R McKay; P30-CA054174 for Pankil K Shah and Dimpy P Shah; KL2 TR002646 for Pankil Shah and the American Cancer Society and Hope Foundation for Cancer Research (MRSG-16-152-01-CCE) and P30-CA054174 for Dimpy P Shah. REDCap is developed and supported by Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research grant support (UL1 TR000445 from NCATS/NIH). The funding sources had no role in the writing of the manuscript or the decision to submit it for publication. CCC19 registry is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04354701.

BackgroundThree different injectable neurokinin-1 (NK-1) receptor antagonist formulations (CINVANTI® [C] vs. intravenous Emend® [E] vs. generic formulations of fosaprepitant [GFF]) were compared with respect to nausea and vomiting control, use of rescue therapy, and the development of infusion reactions over multiple cycles of chemotherapy.MethodsA retrospective analysis from 17 community oncology practices across the USA was conducted on patients who received moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy. The co-primary endpoints were the control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) from days 1 to 5 over all cycles and the frequency of infusion-related reactions. Propensity score weighted multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to compare complete CINV control, the use of rescue therapy, and the risk of infusion reactions between groups.ResultsThe study enrolled 294 patients (C = 101, E = 101, GFF = 92) who received 1432 cycles of chemotherapy. Using CINVANTI® as the reference group, comparative effectiveness was suggested in CINV control over all chemotherapy cycles (odds ratio (OR): E vs. C = 1.00 [0.54 to 1.86] and GFF vs. C = 1.12 [0.54 to 2.32]). However, use of rescue therapy was significantly higher in the EMEND® group relative to CINVANTI® (OR = 2.69; 95%CI: 1.06 to 6.84). Infusion reactions were also numerically higher in the EMEND® group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (OR = 4.35; 95%CI: 0.83 to 22.8).ConclusionsIn this real-world analysis, patients receiving CINVANTI® had a reduced need for CINV rescue therapy and a numerically lower incidence of infusion reactions.