- Research Article
11
- 10.1038/468347a
Curiouser and curiouser: managing discovery making
- Nov 01, 2010
- Nature
- Ahmed Zewail
On a recent official visit to southeast Asia, a prime minister asked me: What does it take to get a Nobel prize? I answered immediately: Invest in basic research and recruit the best minds. This curiosity-driven approach seems increasingly oldfashioned and underappreciated in our modern age of science. Some believe that more can be achieved through tightly managed research — as if we can predict the future. I believe this is an unfortunate misconception that affects and infects research funding. I hear repeatedly, particularly in developing countries: Applied research is what we need. There is nothing wrong with a nation having mission-oriented research and development to solve specific problems or to dedicate to an outreach programme, such as space exploration or alternative energy. During my visits as a US science envoy, I have emphasized that without solid investment in science education and a fundamental science base, nations will not acquire the ground-breaking knowledge required to make discoveries and innovations that will shape their future.
Read more