QuantumBio (United States)

Dequantization of quantum machine learning models is the methodology of creating an equivalent classical model using a partial Fourier series over the classical input variables such that the classical model can be efficiently run on a classical computer whilst being as accurate as its quantum counterpart. In this paper, we present an experimental validation of the dequantization of quantum machine learning models using realworld WiFi localization dataset. The classical surrogate model necessitates the same amount order-of-magnitude parameters in the worst case without any statistically significant reduction in accuracy. At the same time, it demonstrates the usefulness of quantum machine learning to obtain an efficient and accurate classical model for classification and regression tasks.

For decades, the complicated energy surfaces found in macromolecular protein:ligand structures, which require large amounts of computational time and resources for energy state sampling, have been an inherent obstacle to fast, routine free energy estimation in industrial drug discovery efforts. Beginning in 2013, the Merz research group addressed this cost with the introduction of a novel sampling methodology termed “Movable Type” (MT). Using numerical integration methods, the MT method reduces the computational expense for energy state sampling by independently calculating each atomic partition function from an initial molecular conformation in order to estimate the molecular free energy using ensembles of the atomic partition functions. In this work, we report a software package, the DivCon Discovery Suite with the MovableType module from QuantumBio Inc., that performs this MT free energy estimation protocol in a fast, fully encapsulated manner. We discuss the computational procedures and improvements to the original work, and we detail the corresponding settings for this software package. Finally, we introduce two validation benchmarks to evaluate the overall robustness of the method against a broad range of protein:ligand structural cases. With these publicly available benchmarks, we show that the method can use a variety of input types and parameters and exhibits comparable predictability whether the method is presented with “expensive” X-ray structures or “inexpensively docked” theoretical models. We also explore some next steps for the method. The MovableType software is available at http://www.quantumbioinc.com/

Gaining an understanding of the protein-ligand complex structure along with the proper protonation and explicit solvent effects can be important in obtaining meaningful results in structure-guided drug discovery and structure-based drug discovery. Unfortunately, protonation and tautomerism are difficult to establish with conventional methods because of difficulties in the experimental detection of H atoms owing to the well known limitations of X-ray crystallography. In the present work, it is demonstrated that semiempirical, quantum-mechanics-based macromolecular crystallographic refinement is sensitive to the choice of a protonation-state/tautomer form of ligands and residues, and can therefore be used to explore potential states. A novel scoring method, called XModeScore, is described which enumerates the possible protomeric/tautomeric modes, refines each mode against X-ray diffraction data with the semiempirical quantum-mechanics (PM6) Hamiltonian and scores each mode using a combination of energetic strain (or ligand strain) and rigorous statistical analysis of the difference electron-density distribution. It is shown that using XModeScore it is possible to consistently distinguish the correct bound protomeric/tautomeric modes based on routine X-ray data, even at lower resolutions of around 3 Å. These X-ray results are compared with the results obtained from much more expensive and laborious neutron diffraction studies for three different examples: tautomerism in the acetazolamide ligand of human carbonic anhydrase II (PDB entries 3hs4 and 4k0s), tautomerism in the 8HX ligand of urate oxidase (PDB entries 4n9s and 4n9m) and the protonation states of the catalytic aspartic acid found within the active site of an aspartic protease (PDB entry 2jjj). In each case, XModeScore applied to the X-ray diffraction data is able to determine the correct protonation state as defined by the neutron diffraction data. The impact of QM-based refinement versus conventional refinement on XModeScore is also discussed.

We have generated docking poses for the FKBP-GPI complex using eight docking programs, and compared their scoring functions with scoring based on NMR chemical shift perturbations (NMRScore). Because the chemical shift perturbation (CSP) is exquisitely sensitive on the orientation of the ligand inside the binding pocket, NMRScore offers an accurate and straightforward approach to score different poses. All scoring functions were inspected by their abilities to highly rank the native-like structures and separate them from decoy poses generated for a protein-ligand complex. The overall performance of NMRScore is much better than that of energy-based scoring functions associated with docking programs in both aspects. In summary, we find that the combination of docking programs with NMRScore results in an approach that can robustly determine the binding site structure for a protein-ligand complex, thereby providing a new tool facilitating the structure-based drug discovery process.

International Journal of Quantum ChemistryVolume 16, Issue 1 p. 3-4 IntroductionFree Access Introduction Ralph E. Christoffersen, Ralph E. Christoffersen President International Society of Quantum Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KansasSearch for more papers by this author Ralph E. Christoffersen, Ralph E. Christoffersen President International Society of Quantum Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KansasSearch for more papers by this author First published: July 1979 https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.560160103AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. Volume16, Issue1July 1979Pages 3-4 RelatedInformation