Rehabilitation Research and Development Service

Intracortical brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) that decode complex movements, such as handwriting and speech, can require substantial training data to achieve high performance. We investigated whether leveraging the neural activity recordings of previous users could reduce this initial data collection burden for new BCI users (an approach we call "cross-brain transfer"). Using intracortical recordings from five BrainGate2 clinical trial participants, we tested cross-brain transfer for both speech and handwriting neural decoders trained and evaluated on general, unconstrained corpora of spoken and written English. We found that cross-brain transfer improved decoding performance when training data from the target user was limited (< 200 sentences), and that dataset-specific input layers to the decoder were critical for combining data across users. Without trainable input layers, transfer failed and performed worse than training from scratch on target user data only. Finally, we measured the effectiveness of cross-brain transfer relative to training with (1) more data from the same user and (2) more electrode-permuted data from the same user, which simulates sampling from another brain with identical neural latent structure. In some cases (T16 speech, T12 handwriting), cross-brain transfer appeared as effective as additional permuted data from the same user, while in others (T12 speech, T15 speech) electrode-permuted data was more beneficial. Our results successfully demonstrate and characterize cross-brain transfer learning between multiple intracortical BCI users, for both speech and handwriting, using a general open-ended dataset not restricted to small sets of words or phrases. This work highlights a promising path towards addressing a key barrier to the clinical translation of BCIs, while clarifying when cross-brain transfer may be most beneficial and the decoder design choices needed to realize those gains.

目的：ロボット支援歩行練習後に歩行が自立に至った患者の臨床的特徴を，練習開始時の状態から確認すること．

This clinical focus article provides an overview of essential areas of current teleaudiology practice and goals for future expansion and innovation. It includes descriptions of telehealth models, rural expansion capabilities, access improvement initiatives, pilot programs, remote audiology applications, and overcoming barriers to teleaudiology. Positive changes within teleaudiology service delivery are accomplished with advancements in technology, connectivity, and software; carefully planned and coordinated approaches; and investment in personnel who contribute their talent and commitment to the process.

BackgroundPeople with schizophrenia on average are more socially isolated, lonelier, have more social cognitive impairment, and are less socially motivated than healthy individuals. People with bipolar disorder also have social isolation, though typically less than that seen in schizophrenia. We aimed to disentangle whether the social cognitive and social motivation impairments observed in schizophrenia are a specific feature of the clinical condition v. social isolation generally.MethodsWe compared four groups (clinically stable patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, individuals drawn from the community with self-described social isolation, and a socially connected community control group) on loneliness, social cognition, and approach and avoidance social motivation.ResultsIndividuals with schizophrenia (n = 72) showed intermediate levels of social isolation, loneliness, and social approach motivation between the isolated (n = 96) and connected control (n = 55) groups. However, they showed significant deficits in social cognition compared to both community groups. Individuals with bipolar disorder (n = 48) were intermediate between isolated and control groups for loneliness and social approach. They did not show deficits on social cognition tasks. Both clinical groups had higher social avoidance than both community groupsConclusionsThe results suggest that social cognitive deficits in schizophrenia, and high social avoidance motivation in both schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, are distinct features of the clinical conditions and not byproducts of social isolation. In contrast, differences between clinical and control groups on levels of loneliness and social approach motivation were congruent with the groups' degree of social isolation.