Challenges in providing care to patients with disorders of consciousness in Russia: an online survey of healthcare professionals
INTRODUCTION: Patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) represent a complex patient cohort requiring a multidisciplinary approach. Despite the availability of modern national clinical guidelines (2023), real-world clinical practice in Russia continues to be challenged by the use of outdated terminology, insufficient implementation of validated diagnostic scales, and a lack of standardized management approaches, including pain assessment and management. This study was prompted by the need to assess the current situation and identify key issues to improve the quality of care for patients with DoC in Russia. OBJECTIVE: To assess the current practices, awareness, and key challenges faced by Russian healthcare professionals in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of patients with chronic DoC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2024, an anonymous online survey of 204 medical and paramedical professionals (anesthesiologists, neurologists, rehabilitation specialists, psychologists, nursing staff) from various regions of Russia was conducted. The 47-item questionnaire covered demographic data, terminology used, diagnostic scales, treatment and rehabilitation methods, as well as approaches to pain assessment and management. RESULTS: Despite modern clinical guidelines, outdated terminology persists in practice: apallic syndrome (13.3 %), vegetative state. Only 62.9 % of respondents use the validated Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) for DoC diagnosis, while 77.1 % still use non-relevant scales (Glasgow Coma Scale, Full Outline of UnResponsiveness — FOUR). 30 % of respondents, including physicians responsible for diagnosis, use exclusively these non-relevant tools. Significant differences in approaches were identified among specialists of different profiles (intensivists, neurologists, rehabilitation specialists). The majority of respondents (83 %) acknowledge that DoC patients experience pain; however, the assessment methods (autonomic signs, grimacing) are not standardized and can be non-specific. CONCLUSIONS: The study results indicate insufficient awareness and fragmented implementation of modern standards for the diagnosis and management of patients with DoC in Russia. The findings highlight the necessity of developing and implementing educational programs for healthcare professionals aimed at standardizing terminology, promoting the use of validated diagnostic scales (CRS-R), and harmonizing approaches to pain management.
Read more