Sall Research Medical Center

Isunakinra, formerly known as EBI-005, is a novel interleukin (IL)-1 receptor inhibitor developed for topical treatment of patients with dry eye disease (DED). This phase 1b/2a multicenter, double-masked, randomized, vehicle controlled environmental trial assessed the safety and biological activity of isunakinra in patients with moderate to severe DED. Subjects (N=74) were randomized to vehicle (placebo) or isunakinra (5 or 20 mg/mL) 3×/daily for 6 weeks. Evaluations included safety, tolerability, biological activity for signs (corneal fluorescein staining [CFS]), symptoms (pain or sore eyes and total Ocular Surface Disease Index [OSDI]), and reduction in rescue artificial tear use. Topical administration of isunakinra (5 and 20 mg/mL) was safe and well tolerated and resulted in clinically relevant improvements in symptoms (OSDI score, painful/sore eye component of OSDI) and signs (total CFS) compared with baseline with no dose response. OSDI scores improved from baseline by 38% (18.9 points) at 6 weeks and CFS scores improved by 33% (3 points) in the isunakinra groups. These changes were not statistically significant compared with the vehicle. Use of artificial rescue tears was significantly reduced in the isunakinra treatment groups (mean=9 vials) compared with vehicle (mean=31 vials). The differences between isunakinra and vehicle treatments were more pronounced in subjects with OSDI scores less than 50 at baseline. Isunakinra was safe, well tolerated and showed clinically meaningful improvements in signs and symptoms of DED. These results encouraged the design of an adequately powered study to characterize the safety and efficacy of isunakinra in ocular surface diseases.

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to compare changes in corneal staining in patients with dry eye after 6 weeks of treatment with Systane® Gel Drops or Refresh Liquigel® lubricant eye drops.MethodsPatients aged ≥18 years with a sodium fluorescein corneal staining sum score of ≥3 in either eye and best-corrected visual acuity of 0.6 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution or better in each eye who were using a lubricant eye gel or ointment for dry eye were included in this randomized, parallel-group, multicenter, double-blind trial. Patients were randomized to four times daily Systane® Gel Drops (polyethylene glycol 400 0.4% and propylene glycol 0.3%) or Refresh LiquiGel® Drops (carboxymethylcellulose sodium 1%) for 6 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was mean change from baseline to week 6 in sodium fluorescein corneal staining. Supportive efficacy outcomes included conjunctival staining, tear film break-up time, Patient Global Assessment of Improvement, Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) Treatment Satisfaction/Treatment Bother Questionnaire, Single Symptom Comfort Scale, and Ocular Symptoms Questionnaire. The safety analysis comprised recording of adverse events.ResultsIn total, 147 patients (Systane group, n=73; Refresh group, n=74; mean ± standard deviation age, 57±16 years) were enrolled and included in the safety and efficacy analyses. Corneal staining was significantly reduced from baseline to week 6 for Systane and Refresh (−3.4±2.5 and −2.5±2.6 units, respectively; P<0.0001, t-test), with a significantly greater improvement with Systane versus Refresh (P=0.0294). Results for conjunctival staining, tear film break-up time, and patient-reported outcome questionnaires were not statistically different between groups. No safety issues were identified; adverse events were reported by 19% of patients with Systane and 30% of patients with Refresh eye drops.ConclusionSystane Gel Drops were associated with significantly better corneal staining scores versus Refresh Liquigel eye drops in patients with dry eye. Supportive efficacy outcomes were not significantly different between groups. Both treatments were well tolerated.

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate nepafenac ophthalmic suspension 0.1% (Nevanac®; Alcon Research Ltd) in the prevention of macular edema following cataract surgery in diabetic retinopathy patients.MethodsThis was a multicenter, randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled study of 263 adult diabetic patients with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy requiring cataract surgery. Patients were randomized (1:1) to instill nepafenac or vehicle three times daily beginning 1 day prior to surgery through day 90. Efficacy included the percentage of patients who developed macular edema (≥30% increase in central subfield macular thickness from baseline) and the percentage of patients with decreases of more than five letters in best-corrected visual acuity from day 7 to 90.ResultsA significantly lower percentage of patients in the nepafenac group developed macular edema relative to patients in the vehicle group (3.2% versus 16.7%; P < 0.001). A significantly lower percentage of patients in the nepafenac group had best-corrected visual acuity decreases of more than five letters relative to patients in the vehicle group on day 30 (P < 0.001), day 60 (P = 0.002), and day 90 (P = 0.006). The mean central subfield macular thickness and mean percent change from baseline in macular volume were also significantly lower in the nepafenac group versus the vehicle group at days 14 through 90 (P ≤ 0.005). No safety issues or trends were identified when dosing was increased to 90 days that negatively impacted the favorable benefit/risk profile of nepafenac.ConclusionNepafenac demonstrated statistically significant and clinically relevant advantages compared with vehicle in preventing macular edema and maintaining visual acuity in diabetic patients following cataract surgery. These advantages were seen at multiple time points over the course of the 90-day therapy period. There was no clinically relevant increase in risk from 90 days dosing compared with 14 days. Therefore, with a similar safety profile and benefit in preventing macular edema and maintaining vision, the risk/benefit to the diabetic patient undergoing cataract surgery appears to be positive.