Sanifit (Spain)

Abstract Background and Aims In the CaLIPSO study, SNF472 significantly attenuated progression of coronary artery calcium (CAC) volume score compared with placebo. This pre-specified analysis examined the effect of SNF472 on CAC progression in key subgroups of patients in CaLIPSO. Method Patients with a CAC Agatston score of 100 to 3500 at baseline were randomized to SNF472 300 mg (n=92), SNF472 600 mg (n=91), or placebo (n=91), infused during hemodialysis (HD) thrice weekly for 52 weeks. Patients received standard of care therapy, including phosphate binders and calcimimetics as determined by investigator. The primary endpoint (change in log CAC volume score from baseline to week 52 in the combined dose groups vs placebo) was analyzed for patients who received SNF472 or placebo and had an evaluable CT scan post-randomization (modified ITT population). Sensitivity analysis was also performed for the per protocol population of patients that met entry criteria, received 80% of scheduled treatment, completed the study procedures, and had both a baseline and week 52 evaluable CT scan. The analysis plan pre-specified key subgroups: age, sex, diabetes, dialysis vintage, and arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), as well as baseline use of non-calcium phosphate binders, calcium-based phosphate binders, calcimimetics, activated vitamin D, warfarin, or statins. Results Demographics and disease characteristics were similar across the treatment groups. Age (mean±SD) at baseline was 63.6±8.9 years and 39% of the patients were female; 62% had diabetes and 41% had prior ASCVD. Median dialysis vintage was 42.4 months; 33% had received hemodialysis for ≥5 years. Concomitant medications at baseline were: non-calcium phosphate binders, 62%; calcium-based phosphate binders, 28%; calcimimetics, 31%; activated vitamin D, 51%; warfarin, 8%; and statins, 64%. CAC volume progression was 11% for the combined dose groups and 20% for placebo (p=0.016). Treatment differences for CAC volume score progression from baseline to week 52 were similar across the subgroups (FIGURE). All interaction p-values were non-significant, and comparisons favored SNF472 vs placebo in each subgroup for both the modified ITT and per protocol population. Conclusion SNF472 treatment for 52 weeks attenuated CAC progression compared with placebo in all subgroups of the CaLIPSO study. These results support the potential benefit of SNF472 across a broad population of patients with cardiovascular calcification. Future studies are needed to determine the effects of SNF472 on cardiovascular events in patients receiving HD.

The high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with end-stage kidney disease could be partially caused by extensive cardiovascular calcification. SNF472, intravenous myo-inositol hexaphosphate, selectively inhibits the formation and growth of hydroxyapatite. This double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial compared progression of coronary artery calcium volume score and other measurements of cardiovascular calcification by computed tomography scan during 52 weeks of treatment with SNF472 or placebo, in addition to standard therapy, in adult patients with end-stage kidney disease receiving hemodialysis. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to SNF472 300 mg (n=92), SNF472 600 mg (n=91), or placebo (n=91) by infusion in the hemodialysis lines thrice weekly during hemodialysis sessions. The primary end point was change in log coronary artery calcium volume score from baseline to week 52. The primary efficacy analysis combined the SNF472 treatment groups and included all patients who received at least 1 dose of SNF472 or placebo and had an evaluable computed tomography scan after randomization. The mean change in coronary artery calcium volume score was 11% (95% CI, 7-15) for the combined SNF472 dose group and 20% (95% CI, 14-26) for the placebo group (P=0.016). SNF472 compared with placebo attenuated progression of calcium volume score in the aortic valve (14% [95% CI, 5-24] versus 98% [95% CI, 77-123]; P<0.001) but not in the thoracic aorta (23% [95% CI, 16-30] versus 28% [95% CI, 19-38]; P=0.40). Death occurred in 7 patients (4%) who received SNF472 and 5 patients (6%) who received placebo. At least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event occurred in 86%, 92%, and 87% of patients treated with SNF472 300 mg, SNF472 600 mg, and placebo, respectively. Most adverse events were mild. Adverse events resulted in discontinuation of SNF472 300 mg, SNF472 600 mg, and placebo for 14%, 29%, and 20% of patients, respectively. Compared with placebo, SNF472 significantly attenuated the progression of coronary artery calcium and aortic valve calcification in patients with end-stage kidney disease receiving hemodialysis in addition to standard care. Future studies are needed to determine the effects of SNF472 on cardiovascular events. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02966028.

Background: Inositol hexakisphosphate (IP6) has been found to have an important role in biomineralization. Methods: Because the complete mechanism of action of IP6 on osteoblasts is not fully understood and its potential use in the primary prevention of osteoporosis, we examined the direct effect of IP6 on cell viability and differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells and on differentiation of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hUC-MSCs). Results: We show that IP6 has different effects depending on the origin of the cell target. Thus, while IP6 decreased gene expression of osteoblast markers and mineralization in MC3T3-E1 cells without negatively affecting cell viability and ALP activity, an increase in gene expression of ALP was observed in hUC-MSCs committed to the osteoblastic lineage. This increasing effect of IP6 on ALP mRNA expression levels was reversed by the addition of a selective inhibitor of IP6 kinase, suggesting that the effect of IP6 might be due through its pyrophosphorylated derivatives. Besides, Rankl mRNA levels were decreased after IP6 treatment in MC3T3-E1 cells, pointing to a paracrine effect on osteoclasts. Conclusion: Our results indicate that IP6 has different effects on osteoblast differentiation depending on the cell type and origin. However, further studies are needed to examine the net effect of IP6 on bone formation and its potential as novel antiosteoporosis drug.