Background:Although second opinions are rather restricted to the surgical disciplines,they have become more and more important to the health system in the last 20years. The demand has been triggered by rising health costs and theeconomization of the field. The Internet has also made a considerablecontribution to the demand for patient-initiated second opinions. Giventhese developments, it is surprising that second opinions have not becomemore important in the field of psychiatry. This article highlights thespecial situation of second opinions in psychiatry, discusses possiblebarriers to the adoption of second opinions in psychiatry, and the potentialfor greater use of second opinions in this field.Objective:In psychiatry, second opinions have been neglected by the typical drivers ofinnovations in health care, including insurers and other commercial driversas well as psychiatrists and patients themselves. This review identifiescurrent barriers to widespread adoption of second opinions in psychiatricpractice, discusses the benefits of second opinions that have beendemonstrated in other disciplines, and outlines the potential gains to berealized through use of second opinions in psychiatry.Methods:Literature in the area was reviewed through a search of the main medicaldatabases. This literature review was supported by in-depth interviews withhealth care personnel and insurers.Conclusions:Second opinions are rarely obtained in psychiatry and there is littleliterature on this subject. The stigmatization of psychiatric disorders andpatients and the uniqueness of the patient-doctor relationship inpsychiatry, especially in psychotherapeutic care, may pose considerableobstacles to the use of second opinions in this field. In addition, morestakeholders, such as social workers, government agencies and regulators,health care and disability insurers, and social security agencies, areinvolved in the mental health compared with the somatic health sector, whichmay make it more difficult to achieve a coordinated approach in psychiatriccare. However, we have found no convincingly good reason why second opinionshave not been at least discussed in psychiatry. Psychiatry could benefitfrom ongoing discussions concerning the outcomes of second opinions in othermedical disciplines.
Read more