Setauket Fire Department

This was a descriptive analysis of a convenience sample of cases submitted to the Wisconsin Tactical Medicine Initiative (Wisconsin USA), after the provision of successful patient care, between January 2010 and December 2015. The study was reviewed by the Mayo Foundation Institutional Review Board (Rochester, Minnesota USA) and deemed exempt. Nineteen agencies submitted information during the study period. Of the 56 episodes of care reported, four (7.1%) cases involved care provided to injured officers while 52 (92.9%) involved care to injured civilians, including suspects. In at least two cases, on-going threats existed during the provision of medical care to an injured civilian. Law enforcement rendered care prior to Emergency Medical Services (EMS) arrival in all but two cases. The current case series demonstrates the life-saving potential for law enforcement personnel trained and equipped under current Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC)/ Committee on Tactical Emergency Casualty Care (C-TECC) tactical casualty care guidelines. Although originally developed to save the lives of wounded combat personnel, in the civilian sector, the training appears more likely to save victims rather than law enforcement personnel. Stiles CM , Cook C , Sztajnkrycer MD . A descriptive analysis of tactical casualty care interventions performed by law enforcement personnel in the State of Wisconsin, 2010-2015. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32(3):284-288.

Objective. To determine whether paramedics influence the outcome of cardiac arrest patients in a rural area. Methods. Retrospective analysis of cardiorespiratory arrest patients in rural southeast Alaska from 1987 to 1996. Results. Paramedics treated 37 patients and advanced life support emergency medical technicians (EMT-IIIs) treated 34 patients. Demographics/CPR variables of the two groups were similar. Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was 46% (17/37) for the paramedic-treated patients and 18% (6/34) for the EMT-III-treated patients (p = 0.01). Intensive care unit (ICU) admission was 38% (14/37) for the paramedic-treated patients and 15% (5/34) for the EMT-111-treated patients (p < 0.03). Discharge from the hospital neurologically intact was 20% (7/35) for the paramedic-treated patients and 9% (3/34) for the EMT-III-treated patients (p = NS). Two patients in the paramedic-treated group had ROSC and survived in the local hospital ICU for several days before being transferred to a tertiary care hospital in another state and were lost to follow-up for the discharge-from-hospital-neurologically-intact category but were included in the ROSC and ICU admission analysis. Conclusion. In this rural setting, a paramedic on the scene significantly improved the ROSC (paramedics = 46% vs 18% for EMT-III, p = 0.01) and survival to ICU admission (38% vs 15%, p = 0.03). The presence of a paramedic on the scene increased survival to hospital discharge neurologically intact (20% vs 9%), although this was not statistically significant.