St Stephen’s AIDS Trust

Objectives: Tenofovir DF (TDF) remains one of the preferred backbone agents for naïve HIV patients starting antiretroviral treatment (ART). The impact of TDF on renal function and metabolic parameters may vary by anchor agent. We investigated the impact of TDF in combination with 3 different integrase inhibitors on tubular and glomerular function, and metabolic parameters in ART-naïve patients. Methods: Sixty patients with normal renal function were randomised (20 per arm) to TDF/emtricitabine (FTC) plus either raltegravir (RAL) (400 mg b.d.), dolutegravir (DTG) or elvitegravir/cobicistat (EVG/c) for 48 weeks. Results: 57 patients completed the study. Significant increases in RBP/creatinine ratio at week 24 were seen in all arms [RAL +4.7 μg/mmol (CI 0.43 to 8.98, p = 0.032); DTG +4.96 μg/mmol (CI 0.77 to 9.15, p = 0.021); EVG/c +6.95 μg/mmol (CI 2.53 to 11.36, p = 0.002)], although this was not sustained to week 48 in the RAL arm. Similar changes across the arms were observed for urinary α1microglobulin (RAL +6.20 mg/L, p = 0.030; DTG +6.30 mg/L, p = 0.025; EVG/c +8.15 mg/L, p = 0.003). Urinary β2microglobulin significantly increased at week 24 with DTG and EVG/c but remained unchanged in the RAL arm. Glomerular filtration measured with CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C increased significantly in the RAL arm at week 24 through 48 but declined modestly in other two arms. Total and LDL cholesterol decreased in the RAL arm, but increased in the EVG/c arm, with no significant changes in the DTG arm. Weight increased significantly from baseline with DTG but not RAL or EVG/c. Conclusion: INSTIs in combination with TDF/FTC impact differently on tubular microproteinuria, eGFR, metabolic markers and weight. Use of TDF/FTC with RAL had the least tubular effects and the most favorable metabolic profile.

Due to a production error the bottom portion of Figure 1 was omitted. The corrected figure is given below.

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antiretroviral drugs is performed in selected HIV-positive patients. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of undetectable plasma concentrations of ritonavir and boosted PIs and to evaluate the association between those and the 48 week risk of virological failure. A TDM registry study and a retrospective follow-up study were conducted. Plasma concentrations were measured through validated methods. According to PI and ritonavir concentrations, patients were stratified as adherent, partially non-adherent or non-adherent. Virological outcome was evaluated 48 weeks afterwards. The TDM registry study included 2468 samples collected from 723 patients (68.1% male, median age 43.5 years). Eighty-seven samples (3.5%, 74 patients) and 68 samples (2.8%, 52 patients) were in the partially non-adherent and non-adherent groups, respectively; more patients on atazanavir/ritonavir (7.9%) versus darunavir/ritonavir (2% twice daily and 1.9% once daily) and lopinavir/ritonavir (1.5%; P < 0.001) were observed in the partially non-adherent group. Two hundred and ninety patients were included in the follow-up study (64.1% male, median age 40 years). Patients in the adherent group had a higher chance of viral control [81.9% (167/204)] versus the partially non-adherent group and the non-adherent group [71.7% (33/46) and 53.1% (17/32), respectively; P = 0.001]. Based on multivariate analysis, baseline HIV RNA >50 copies/mL ( P < 0.001), genotypic susceptibility score ≤2 ( P = 0.001), lower nadir CD4 cell count ( P = 0.003) and not being in the adherent group ( P = 0.029) were independent predictors of HIV RNA >50 copies/mL at 48 weeks. The measurement of PI and ritonavir plasma levels can uncover incomplete compliance with treatment; TDM may represent a useful tool for identifying patients in need of adherence-promoting interventions.

RAISEonline 2012 contains some significant changes. Colin Logan looks at what additional information can be gleaned from these online reports to help you when Ofsted comes calling.

Investigational product:Rosuvastatin (Crestor®; Astra Zeneca).Active ingredients:Rosuvastatin (5 mg).Study title:Prevention of Atherosclerosis in Patients Living with HIV.Phase of study:Phase III.Aims:Primary aim:To assess whether rosuvastatin therapy could slow the progression of the carotid intima-media thickness (C-IMT; as measured by the change in the mean IMT of the near and far walls of the distal common carotid arteries) over 2 years in HIV-infected patients (HIV-IP).Secondary aims:To assess whether rosuvastatin therapy could reduce highly sensitive C reactive protein (hs-CRP) inflammatory marker that is increased in HIV-IP.To assess the effect of rosuvastatin therapy on serum lipid levels (total cholesterol [TC], low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol and triglycerides [TG]) and apolipoproteins (APO A1, APO B and APO B/A1).To assess the safety of rosuvastatin in HIV-IP through the evaluation of clinical laboratory analyses (liver function tests and creatine kinase) and adverse events (AEs).Study design:Two-year randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study.Planned sample size:320 HIV-IP.Summary of eligibility criteria:HIV-IP who are aged between 30 and 60 years, with a CD4 count. greater than 200 cells/mm3. Patients must be stable on combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) for at least 12 months and have a 10-year CVD risk of less than 20% (using the Framingham risk score).Number of study centers:One.Duration of treatment:Two years (5 mg rosuvastatin or placebo once daily).Dose and route of administration:Oral rosuvastatin (5 mg) once daily.The incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in HIV-IP is at least three times higher than in the general population and further increases each year with combination anti-retroviral therapy (cART). The carotid atherosclerosis progression rate is 10 times higher in HIV-IP than in uninfected individuals. The aim of this study is to assess whether therapy with 5 mg rosuvastatin could:1) Slow the progression in the mean IMT of the distal common carotid arteries over two years in HIV-IP.2) Change the concentration in the inflammatory marker – hs-CRP, which is increased in HIV-IP.3) Change the concentrations of TC, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, TG, apolipoproteins (APO) B, APO A1 and APO B/A1.4) Be administered safely in the study population.Pharmacological intervention with rosuvastatin will be evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial in HIV-IP treated with cART not matching the published selection criteria for lipid-lowering therapy. For the first time, this study will investigate anti-inflammatory and anti-atherogenic effects of a pharmacological lipid-lowering agent in HIV-IP that may lead to the reduction of CVD.

We investigated the relationship between ritonavir concentrations and changes in lipids, vascular inflammation markers, CD36, and adipophilin expression in volunteers randomly assigned to groups receiving 100 mg of ritonavir once daily or twice daily. In both groups decreases in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (6%, P = 0.010; and 10%, P < 0.001, respectively) and CD36 (14%, P = 0.012; and 16%, P = 0.006, respectively) and increases in the vascular inflammation marker sCD40L (12%, P = 0.008; 19%, P = 0.003, respectively) were seen. Increases in adipophilin (30%, P = 0.044) and triglycerides (32%, P = 0.044) were seen only in the group receiving ritonavir twice daily. The ritonavir concentration in the plasma correlated with changes in triglycerides, HDL, and adipophilin (r = 0.34, P = 0.030; r = 0.33, P = 0.040; and r = 0.4, P = 0.01, respectively).

We aimed to compare the steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters and tolerability of Triomune 40 (stavudine 40 mg, lamivudine 150 mg and nevirapine 200 mg) and branded formulations of these drugs in HIV-infected Ugandans. This includes a randomized, open-label, cross-over study of HIV-infected patients stable on therapy for 1 month. Patients were randomized to generic or branded formulation. Plasma pharmacokinetics were assessed after 1 month. The following day, alternate formulation was administered, and 1 month later, drug pharmacokinetics were re-assessed. Plasma pharmacokinetics were determined using HPLC-UV detection. Similarity between steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters was assessed using the US Food and Drug Administration standards for bioequivalency testing. Tolerability was assessed using questionnaires. Sixteen (10 females) patients completed the study. Median (IQR) age, weight and CD4 count were 37 (33.7-40) years, 65 (63.4-66) kg and 292 (220.7-344.5) cells/mm(3), respectively. All patients received co-trimoxazole. The geometric mean ratio (90% CI) for stavudine, lamivudine and nevirapine was 0.92 (0.78-1.08), 1.11 (0.95-1.30) and 0.84 (0.64-1.11), respectively, for C(max), and 0.83 (0.70-0.97), 1.06 (0.94-1.20) and 0.88 (0.71-1.10), respectively, for AUC. Stavudine plasma concentrations were significantly lower for the generic formulation. Pharmacokinetic parameter inter-individual variability ranged from 29% to 99%. There were no differences in tolerability for the two formulations. Pharmacokinetic profiles of generic and branded drugs were similar. Differences particularly with regard to stavudine were demonstrated. Surveillance of the quality of generic antiretroviral drugs in the target populations is needed. Capacity building for pharmacokinetic research in resource-limited settings is a priority.