- Conference Article
- 10.1183/13993003.congress-2025.pa471
Double-blind crossover randomised controlled trial of inhalation challenge in assessment of inducible laryngeal obstruction (ILO)
- Sep 27, 2025
- Jemma Haines + 7 more +7
<bold>Introduction:</bold> We hypothesised that ILO represents an inappropriate triggering of the laryngeal adductor reflex (LAR) on exposure to irritant stimuli. Pre-clinical data suggest citric acid (CA) activates airway reflexes via chemically and mechanically sensitive airway vagal afferent nerve fibres and may be a suitable agent for investigating upper airway reflex responses. We therefore investigated whether CA provokes ILO in patients diagnosed with ILO compared with refractory chronic cough (RCC) or healthy controls (HC). <bold>Methods:</bold> Participants completed two inhalation challenges during laryngoscopy (4-7 days apart), with ascending concentrations of CA or matched saline control; order of delivery was randomised sequentially and blinded to study team and participants. The primary endpoint was presence or absence of laryngeal obstruction following inhalation (defined as >50% inspiratory obstruction on video playback); 20% of recordings re-rated, both raters blinded to challenge agent and diagnosis. <bold>Results:</bold> 28 participants were randomised [10 ILO (10% male, mean±SD age 45±10yrs); 7 RCC (86% male, age 57±22yrs; 11 HC (44% male, age 56±8yrs)]. Saline control induced ILO in 1 subject (ILO group) hence responses were not statistically significant different between diagnostic groups (Fisher-Freeman-Halton Exact Test, p=0.61), whereas CA triggered ILO in all ILO patients, 2 RCC patients and no healthy controls (p<0.001). There was substantial kappa agreement for primary endpoint observations (k=0.852, p<0.01). <bold>Conclusion:</bold> These data are consistent with neuronal mechanisms mediating ILO; and suggests CA as a potential challenge agent for clinical testing.
Read more