- Abstract
- 10.1136/annrheumdis-2024-eular.940
POS1499-HPR EVALUATION OF USABILITY AND FEASIBILITY AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE DIGITAL TRAINING DIARY FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH AXSPA
- Jun 01, 2024
- Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
- N Pfyl + 3 more +3
Background:The Swiss ankylosing spondylitis association (SVMB) aims to implement exercise recommendations [1] for individuals with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). A digital training diary (Trainingslog) was developed to promote physical activity (PA) through self-monitoring and feedback and be used for PA counselling [2]. Usability is considered a key factor for the acceptance and use of a mobile health intervention [3] and is defined in terms of user performance and satisfaction and acceptance in terms of product usage [4]. Feasibility indicates the extent to which an innovation can be successfully used or implemented in a particular organisation or environment [5]. The quality of the mobile Health Intervention, as well as the adherence of the end-users is essentially influenced by the knowledge of usability, feasibility and acceptance of the Trainingslog.Objectives:To evaluate usability, feasibility and acceptance of the Trainingslog among individuals with axSpA and their physiotherapists (PTs) and to provide recommendations for further development.Methods:The study has an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design and was performed among the potential end-users of the Trainingslog. Within the development of the Trainingslog a user-centered approach was persued in which the opinions of users were taken into account at every stage of the development process.2 Data were collected through the questionnaires System Usability Scale (SUS, 0-100 scale) and user version of the Mobile App Rating Scale (uMARS, 5 point scale), number of training entries and semi-structured online focus groups or individual interviews. Ethical approval was obtained (BASEC-NR. Rec-2022-00578).Results:A total of 11 PTs and 10 individuals with axSpA participated. The quantitative data showed mean SUS scores for usability of: 82.5 (SD 21.76) for PTs and 77.0 (SD 9.34) for individuals with axSpA, and mean uMARS sector B scores for feasibility of: 4.2 (SD 0.49) for PTs and individuals with axSpA: 4.1 (SD 0.38). Acceptance was given according to the results of the uMARS (Sector E and F mean score >3 in both groups), but lower than expected agreement of the training entries (matching training entries in the Trainingslog and paper diary: 59.86%). The result of the qualitative data analysis revealed good usability and feasibility, but lower acceptance, which is mainly due to the web-based link instead of an app version.Conclusion:The Trainingslog exhibits good usability and feasibility among individuals. Therefore, it shows potential to be used by PTs in PA counselling or as self-monitoring tool for individuals with axSpA. However, to increase acceptance, it is recommended to provide the Trainingslog in an app-based version and implement other suggestions for improvement.REFERENCES:[1] Rausch Osthoff A-K, Niedermann K, et al. 2018 EULAR recommendations for physical activity in people with inflammatory arthritis and osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2018;77:1251–60.[2] McCurdie T, et al. mHealth Consumer Apps: The Case for User-Centered Design. Biomed Instrum Technol 2012;46:49–56.[3] Zapata BC, et al. Empirical Studies on Usability of mHealth Apps: A Systematic Literature Review. J Med Syst 2015;39:1.[4] Bevan N, et al. What is Usability. Proc 4th Int Conf HCI 1991.[5] Proctor E, et al. Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res 2011;38:65–76.Acknowledgements:Thanks to all PTs and individuals with axSpA for participation.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.
Read more