Universitatea Europeană Drăgan

Mutual respect and availability for dialogue are character traits that are so necessary nowadays, since as a rule the contemporary human being frequently manifests as a selfish being, focused only on personal well-being, on the cult of personality or on the distortion of reality, intolerant or indifferent to the sufferings of those who do not share his value system, without knowing the definition of empathy.
 
 The pending study aims to highlight the quality of the institutional dialogue, namely the manner in which a court decision is respected by a territorial administrative authority and the mayor, as well as to highlight the fact that in some cases, unfortunately, with the evasion of legal norms, some court decisions pronounced by the administrative litigation courts are framed, like a true work of art, a painting, not being enforced.
 
 The title chosen for the study conjures an exercise in rhetoric, as "procatalepsis" represents a figure of speech in which the speaker raises an objection to his own argument and then immediately responds. By doing so, he hopes to strengthen his argument by addressing possible counterarguments before the audience can raise them. The etymology of the word reveals that it comes from the ancient Greek: προ- (pro-, "before") + κατάληψις (katálēpsis, "act of catching"), via the Latin "procatalepsis", which implies "anticipation and response to an objection".

This article presents the importance of English as an employability skill on the Romanian labour market nowadays. The purpose of the research is to gather information about the necessity of knowing English for securing employment and to what extent English is used regularly by Romanian professionals at the workplace. The study provides information about the employees’ current level of English proficiency, LSRW English skills used at the workplace, confidence in LSRW skills and area for improvement.

Usually,the succession is based on the principle of ties of blood between the persons in the same family.Not all the relatives of the deceased, no matter their degree, are called to receive an inheritance, because if they are called to receive an inheritance in an indefinite way and at the same time it would lead to an excessive partition of the inherited patrimony, fact which is not desired.In order to know the relatives who have the right to inherit the de cujus, the legislator uses two points of reference in order to establish the persons called to receive an inheritance, namely: the order of heirs and the degree of relationship between the deceased and the heirs.That is why, from the persons with legal rights, the legislator has established a certain specific order to call to receive an inheritance based on three general principles, each of them having some exceptions.Thus, the legislator has created four orders of heirs, establishing between them a priority sequence, according to their degree of kinship to the deceased.As we have previously mentioned, in the Civil Code the relatives of de cujus are classified in four orders of heirs, they being called to receive an inheritance in a pre-established sequence.Thus, if there is a single heir in the first order of heirs, who did not waive the inheritance and who has not been disqualified by conduct, he or she excludes from the succession the heirs in the subsequent orders.The heirs in the second order are called to receive the inheritance only if there are no relatives in the first order or if they have waived the succession or have been disqualified by conduct, the ones in the third order only if there are no heirs in the first two orders and so on.In the case there are heirs from different orders, in order to effectively call to receive an inheritance it is essential to establish the sequence of orders, and not their degree of relationship to the deceased.When we talk about the right to inherit of the relatives of the deceased as a necessary condition of the right to inherit, we must analyse it from two points of view, namely: the general right to inherit and the specific right to inherit.Thus, for a person to be effectively called to receive an inheritance, therefore to have a specific legal right, it is not enough for them to be included in the category of legal heirs, with general rights, but they also must meet a negative condition, namely they must not be excluded from the inheritance by another person called by the law in a priority order.We must take into consideration the fact that the right to inherit as an abstract fitness, becomes potential by the general right to inherit and effective, useful, by the specific right.

The world changed and, together with it, all its constitutive systems. Either it is about the economic system or the social one, the recent events showed that change is possible, and even very rapidly. COVID19 pandemic substantially changed the way the people trade. The somewhat forced digitalization of all sectors brought with itself a ”revolution” of the traditional thinking, a road of no return, a one-way road. Even without a solid infrastructure, the people demonstrated how quickly they could adapt themselves. Because the people who ”tasted” the comfort of digitalisation will no longer want to go back to the previous comfort zone. In the financial and banking system, the card is not something new, but its use has known, during this period, an expansion without precedent. Similarly, the online transfer of money, through the applications offered by the banks.