Vifor Pharma (United Kingdom)

Although iron is an essential nutrient for humans, as well as for almost all other organisms, it is poorly absorbed (~15%) from the diet such that most passes through the upper gut into the large intestine. The colonic microbiota is thus exposed to, and potentially influenced by, such residual iron which could have an impact on human health. The aim of the research described here is to determine how the major forms of dietary iron (inorganic iron and haem) influence metabolic activity and composition of the human gut microbiota by utilizing an in vitro parallel, pH-controlled anaerobic batch culture approach. Controlled iron provision was enabled by the design of a ‘modified’ low-iron gut-model medium whereby background iron content was reduced from 28 to 5 μM. Thus, the impact of both low and high levels of inorganic and haem iron (18–180 μM and 7.7–77 μM, respectively) could be explored. Gut-microbiota composition was determined using next generation sequencing (NGS) based community profiling (16S rRNA gene sequencing) and flow-fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Metabolic-end products (organic acids) were quantified using gas chromatography (GC) and iron incorporation was estimated by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES). Results showed that differences in iron regime induced significant changes in microbiota composition when low (0.1% w/v) fecal inoculation levels were employed. An increase in haem levels from 7.7 to 77 μM (standard levels employed in gut culture studies) resulted in reduced microbial diversity, a significant increase in Enterobacteriaceae and lower short chain fatty acid (SCFA) production. These effects were countered when 18 μM inorganic iron was also included into the growth medium. The results therefore suggest that high-dietary haem may have a detrimental effect on health since the resulting changes in microbiota composition and SCFA production are indicators of an unhealthy gut. The results also demonstrate that employing a low inoculum together with a low-iron gut-model medium facilitated in vitro investigation of the relationship between iron and the gut microbiota.

BackgroundPatients with gastrointestinal disease may have comorbid iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) and an increased risk of hospitalisation and re-attendance in hospital. The purpose of this study was to determine if oral and intravenous (IV) treatment of IDA in patients with gastrointestinal disease attending hospital were associated with differential rates of subsequent re-attendance.Methods and findingsData from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (primary care) and Hospital Treatment Insights (secondary care) databases in England were used to conduct this retrospective cohort study. Patients with a coded gastrointestinal disease and IDA who attended hospital (inpatient or outpatient) and were dispensed oral or IV iron between 01/01/2010-31/10/2013 were included. Elective and emergency re-attendances in secondary care within 30 days of the initial attendance were determined. Demographics, medical diagnoses and treatments were extracted. Re-attendance rates following oral or IV iron were compared using chi-square tests and a step-wise logistic regression model to adjust for confounders. 2,844 patients contributed 6,294 initial attendances; 80% of patients received oral iron, 14% received intravenous iron, and 6% received both. Of initial attendances recording oral iron, 77% resulted in re-attendance in hospital, compared to 34% of those recording IV iron (unadjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.16; adjusted OR: 0.52 [95% CI: 0.44–0.61]). Initial attendances using IV treatment were more likely to result in elective re-attendance (84%) than those recording oral treatment (43%) (p<0.001). Median length of stay in hospital tended to be shorter for patients using IV iron (1.4 days; interquartile range 0.5–3.6 days; oral iron: 5.1 days; interquartile range: 2.2–9.6 days).ConclusionsPatients with gastrointestinal disease and IDA who received IV iron were less likely to re-attend hospital, more likely to re-attend electively, and tended to have a shorter length of stay in hospital. The mode of IDA treatment could have a real-world impact on healthcare utilisation.

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the direct cost of anemia treatment in hemodialysis patients and to evidence factors predictive of 1-year cost. Retrospective study which included hemodialyzed patients during year 2009 in five centers. Patients were evaluable if they had at least one hemoglobin (Hb) assay per month and were monitored for at least 4 months. Patients were classified in different "annual Hb category" according to their monthly mean Hb [Hb categories: Ideal (10 ≤ Hb ≤ 12 g/dL); High (Hb > 12 g/dL) and Low (Hb < 10 g/dL) if >75% of time in respective category, otherwise classified in the Fluctuating category]. We analyzed 636 patients (male, 59.4%) with a mean age of 67 years who underwent 144 hemodialysis sessions (median number per patient) in 2009. The cost of anemia treatment was largely driven by erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) (68% of total cost for Low Hb category and approximately 90% for the other Hb categories). Adjusted predictive factors for 1-year direct cost of anemia treatment (p < 0.0001) were dialysis center (<euro>2,518-<euro>5,617), death (<euro>6,091 vs. <euro>4,911), age (<euro>4,911 for ≤55 years and <euro>5,378 for 65-75 years), female gender (<euro>4,911 vs. <euro>4,398 for male), Low Hb category (<euro>13,005 vs. <euro>5,034 for Ideal, <euro>4,911 for Fluctuating and <euro>2,418 for High), serum ferritin level (<euro>5,102 for 200-500 μg/mL and <euro>4,646 for ≥500 μg/mL) and duration of dialysis (<euro>4,911 if ≤2 years and <euro>2,952 if 4-6 years). Retrospective study, and low number of patients in the Low Hb category. The main factors that were predictive of 1-year cost of anemia treatment in hemodialysis patients were centers, patients in the Low Hb category, and dialysis duration of less than 2 years.

To assess the effect of mycophenolate mofetil compared with intravenous pulses of cyclophosphamide on the nonrenal manifestations of lupus nephritis. Patients with active lupus nephritis (renal biopsy class III, IV, or V) were recruited for the study (n = 370) and treated with mycophenolate mofetil (target dosage 3 gm/day) or intravenous cyclophosphamide (0.5-1.0 gm/m(2)/month), plus tapered prednisone, for 24 weeks. Nonrenal outcomes were determined using measures of whole body disease activity, including the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) disease activity index, the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus: National Assessment (SELENA) version of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), and immunologic variables. Both treatments were effective on whole body disease activity in the systems examined, as indicated by changes in the classic BILAG index. With either treatment, remission was induced, notably in the mucocutaneous, musculoskeletal, cardiovascular/respiratory, and vasculitis systems, and flares were rare, as measured by the SELENA-SLEDAI. Levels of complement C3, C4, and CH50 and titers of anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies were normalized after treatment with either mycophenolate mofetil or intravenous cyclophosphamide. In addition to the efficacy of both treatments on the renal system, this analysis showed that remission could also be induced in other systems. There was no clear difference in efficacy between mycophenolate mofetil and intravenous cyclophosphamide in ameliorating either the renal or nonrenal manifestations. Mycophenolate mofetil is, therefore, a suitable alternative to cyclophosphamide for the treatment of renal and nonrenal disease manifestations in patients with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis.