Wörwag Pharma (Germany)

IntroductionShunting of glycolytic intermediates into the pentose phosphate pathway via transketolase activation by benfotiamine has been suggested to protect from hyperglycemia-induced microvascular damage, but the long-term effects of benfotiamine on diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN) remain unclear.Research design and methodsThis 1:1 randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group monocentric phase II trial compared the efficacy and safety of 1-year treatment with benfotiamine 300 mg two times per day versus placebo over 12 months in participants with type 2 diabetes and mild-to-moderate symptomatic DSPN. The primary endpoint was the change in corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL) assessed by corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) from baseline to 12 months. Secondary endpoints included three other CCM parameters, skin biopsy (four parameters), nerve conduction studies (13 measures), quantitative sensory testing (six parameters), cardiovascular autonomic function tests (17 indices), sudomotor function tests (five parameters), 15 clinical scores and scales for neuropathic symptoms and signs and 13 health-related quality of life and depression instruments. Pharmacokinetics included measurement of six thiamine analytes in blood.ResultsA total of 57 participants underwent randomization. The changes from baseline to 12 months in CNFL did not differ between the two groups. The corresponding changes in the secondary morphometric, functional and clinical neuropathic outcomes as well as quality of life were also similar in the two groups. Only the Neuropathy Symptom Score tended to improve after benfotiamine treatment (p=0.098 vs placebo). Benfotiamine treatment increased the concentrations of all six thiamine analytes studied (p≤0.003 vs placebo). Safety analysis showed no relevant differences between the groups in the rates of adverse events.ConclusionsIn type 2 diabetes individuals with mild-to-moderate symptomatic DSPN, treatment with benfotiamine for 12 months was well tolerated, but had no significant effects on multiple morphometric, neurophysiological and clinical measures of neuropathy.Trial registration numberEuropean Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT) 2017-003054-16 registered on April 10 (https://eudract.ema.europa.eu/), 2018 and German Register for Clinical Trials DRKS00014832 registered on August 3, 2018 (https://drks.de/search/de).

Background and Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to investigate the incidence of lower extremity amputations (LEAs) in a representative population from Romania, in both diabetic and non-diabetic adults, including trauma-related amputations. The secondary objective was to evaluate the trends in LEAs and the overall ratio of major-to-minor amputations. Material and Methods: The study was retrospective and included data from the Romanian National Hospital Discharge Records, conducted between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2019. Results: The overall number of cases with LEAs was 88,102, out of which 38,590 were aterosclerosis-related LEAs, 40,499 were diabetes-related LEAs, and 9013 were trauma-related LEAs, with an ascending trend observed annually for each of these categories. Of the total non-traumatic amputations, 51.2% were in patients with diabetes. Most LEAs were in men. The total incidence increased from 80.61/100,000 in 2015 to 98.15/100,000 in 2019. Conclusions: Our study reported a 21% increase in total LEAs, 22.01% in non-traumatic LEAs, and 19.65% in trauma-related amputation. The minor-to-major amputation ratio increased over the study period in patients with diabetes. According to these findings, it is estimated that currently, in Romania, there is one diabetes-related amputation every hour and one non-traumatic amputation every 30 min.

The present demographic changes toward an aging society caused a rise in the number of senior citizens and the incidence and burden of age-related diseases (such as cardiovascular diseases [CVD], cancer, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease [NAFLD], diabetes mellitus, and dementia), of which nearly half is attributable to the population ≥60 years of age. Deficiencies in individual nutrients have been associated with increased risks for age-related diseases and high intakes and/or blood concentrations with risk reduction. Nutrition in general and the dietary intake of essential and nonessential biofactors is a major determinant of human health, the risk to develop age-related diseases, and ultimately of mortality in the older population. These biofactors can be a cost-effective strategy to prevent or, in some cases, even treat age-related diseases. Examples reviewed herein include omega-3 fatty acids and dietary fiber for the prevention of CVD, α-tocopherol (vitamin E) for the treatment of biopsy-proven nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, vitamin D for the prevention of neurodegenerative diseases, thiamine and α-lipoic acid for the treatment of diabetic neuropathy, and the role of folate in cancer epigenetics. This list of potentially helpful biofactors in the prevention and treatment of age-related diseases, however, is not exhaustive and many more examples exist. Furthermore, since there is currently no generally accepted definition of the term biofactors, we here propose a definition that, when adopted by scientists, will enable a harmonization and consistent use of the term in the scientific literature.