iResearch Atlanta

BackgroundSoluble species of multimeric amyloid-beta including globular amyloid-beta oligomers (AβOs) and linear amyloid-beta protofibrils are toxic to neurons. Sabirnetug (ACU193) is a humanized monoclonal antibody, raised against globular species of soluble AβO, that has over 650-fold greater binding affinity for AβOs over monomers and appears to have relatively little binding to amyloid plaque.ObjectivesTo assess safety, pharmacokinetics, and exploratory measures including target engagement, biomarker effects, and clinical efficacy of sabirnetug in participants with early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease (AD; defined as mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia due to AD).DesignRandomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending dose first-in-human phase 1 study.SettingFifteen study centers in the United States.ParticipantsSixty-five participants with early symptomatic AD.InterventionParticipants received one infusion of sabirnetug 2 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, 25 mg/kg, 60 mg/kg, or placebo (Part A) or three infusions of sabirnetug 10 mg/kg, 25 mg/kg, 60 mg/kg, or placebo (Part B).MeasurementsSafety, tolerability, serum pharmacokinetics, and central target engagement of single and multiple doses of sabirnetug, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of sabirnetug, and amyloid plaque load, as determined by positron emission tomography.ResultsSabirnetug was generally well tolerated. A larger percentage of participants receiving sabirnetug (56.3%) versus placebo (42.9%) had at least one treatment emergent adverse event, with approximately 29% in each group considered related to study drug. Most events were mild-to-moderate in severity. Of 48 participants given sabirnetug, five developed amyloid related imaging abnormalities – edema/effusion, including one instance that was mildly symptomatic in a participant who had received one dose sabirnetug 60 mg/kg. Notably, none of the six apolipoprotein E Ɛ4 homozygotes who received sabirnetug developed amyloid related imaging abnormalities – edema/effusion or – hemorrhage/hemosiderin deposition. Infusion reactions, such as rash, pain, or erythema, were not frequent (6.3% for sabirnetug versus 0.0% for placebo). Sabirnetug exposure was dose proportional in both serum and CSF. Target engagement, defined as drug bound to AβOs in CSF, was shown to be dose and exposure dependent. Over three months, approximately 25% and 20% reduction in amyloid plaques, respectively, were observed in participants receiving three infusions of sabirnetug 60 mg/kg every four weeks and 25 mg/kg every two weeks.ConclusionsThe Phase 1 INTERCEPT-AD study provided safety, tolerability, dosing, and target engagement data that supported the design of the ongoing ALTITUDE-AD study (NCT06335173).

To evaluate the equivalence of immunogenicity, safety and efficacy of Gan & Lee (GL) Glargine (Basalin®; Gan & Lee Pharmaceutical) with that of the reference product (Lantus®) in adult participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This was a phase 3, multicenter, open-label, equivalence trial conducted across 57 sites. In total, 567 participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo treatment with either GL Glargine or Lantus® for 26 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants in each treatment arm who manifested treatment-induced anti-insulin antibodies (AIA). Secondary endpoints included efficacy and safety metrics, changes in glycated haemoglobin levels, and a comparative assessment of adverse events. Results were analysed using an equivalence test comparing the limits of the 90% confidence interval (CI) for treatment-induced AIA development to the prespecified margins. The percentages of participants positive for treatment-induced glycated haemoglobin by week 26 were similar between the GL Glargine (19.2%) and Lantus® (21.3%) treatment groups, with a treatment difference of -2.1 percentage points and a 90% CI (-7.6%, 3.5%) (predefined similarity margins: -10.7%, 10.7%). The difference in glycated haemoglobin was -0.08% (90% CI, -0.23, 0.06). The overall percentage of participants with any treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between the GL Glargine (80.1%) and Lantus® (81.6%) treatment groups. GL Glargine was similar to Lantus® in terms of immunogenicity, efficacy,and safety, based on the current study.