АДМІНІСТРАТИВНИЙ ДОГОВІР В СИСТЕМІ ЗАКОНОДАВСТВА УКРАЇНИ: ПРОБЛЕМАТИКА, ШЛЯХИ ЙОГО УДОСКОНАЛЕННЯ ТА МІЖНАРОДНИЙ ДОСВІД

The article is devoted to the characteristics of the object of related rights of a broadcasting organization. The subject matter of the study is the legal regulation of this object in the Laws of Ukraine “On Television and Radio Broadcasting”, “On Copyright and Related Rights” of 1993, and the Civil Code of Ukraine whose provisions contained conflicts for a long time, and the Law of Ukraine “On Copyright and Related Rights” of 2022. The purpose of the article is to provide a comprehensive characterization of the broadcasting organization program as an object of related rights and to determine its relationship with the separate show of the broadcasting organization. The study was conducted using historical, comparative legal, formal legal, dialectical and logical methods. It is substantiated that a separate show, in case of a creative contribution to its creation, is an oral work (radio show) or an audiovisual work (television show) capable of copyright protection. Related rights of broadcasting organizations extend to a set of shows and other materials combined in the program but not to individual components of this program. This approach is also reflected in the provisions of the new Law of Ukraine “On Copyright and Related Rights” of 2022. It is determined that the program of broadcasting organization is not identical to a composite work since its legal protection covers the result of not creative selection and arrangement of certain materials but organizational and technical efforts to compose certain objects into a complete program.

According to the fact Ukraine sees the process of European integration as one of the main directions of its further development, which is confirmed by the resolution of the European Parliament, according to which Ukraine was granted the status of a candidate country for joining the European Union, the study of the experience of the leading countries of the European Union (hereinafter – the EU) should become a certain basis in the process of reforming the judiciary, the Institute of Advocacy is a part of which. Modern Ukrainian legislation in the context of remuneration for a lawyer’s professional activity has significant shortcomings and contradictions, and with regard to the so-called «success fee», the judicial practice is ambiguous and has already changed several times in previous years. At the same time, the institution of a lawyer’s remuneration for his professional activity needs changes and clarifications also in connection with the fact that the main categorical apparatus, which is used in the regulation of issues of this institute, is not coordinated with its European counterparts, and therefore leads to the emergence of legislative collisions in the future during a closer relationship between Ukraine and the EU countries after Ukraine becomes a member of the EU countries. A study of the historical analysis of the emergence and development of the institution of remuneration of a lawyer for his professional activity, as well as methods of calculating the amount and payment of a lawyer’s fee, forms and methods, which contributes to a comprehensive study of this institution. At the same time, on the basis of a comparative analysis between the studied institute in Ukraine and Germany, it is advisable to develop ways of improving Ukrainian legislation in this field. Special attention is paid to the so-called «success fee» of a lawyer for his professional activity, the issues of application of this type of lawyer’s fee both in Ukraine and in Germany are investigated. On the basis of the analysis, those issues that require further regulation at the legislative level in Ukraine and the identification of types of «success fee» have been identified on the example of how this issue is resolved in the EU countries, taking into account the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. The article is based on general scientific and special methods of scientific knowledge, namely: the dialectical method, the method of synthesis and analysis, the comparative legal method, as well as historical and terminological approaches.

The subject of this work is the study of legal norms contained in Federal Law of May 31, 2002 No. 62-FZ “On Citizenship of the Russian Federation” and international law, establishing grounds for canceling decisions on citizenship in connection with the use of false documents or the reporting of knowingly false information, as well as the judicial practice of their application. We pay attention to the fact that the cancellation of decisions on the acquisition of citizenship is a form of constitutional legal responsibility in the form of the cancellation of a legally significant result. The methodological basis of the research is formal logical, interpretative, logical, comparative legal research methods. Formal legal, interpretative, and comparative legal methods are used in the analysis of the specific content of legal requirements relating to questions of canceling decisions on questions of canceling citizenship of the Russian Federation. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the analysis of the practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation regarding the content of the concepts of “false document” or “knowingly false information”. Of practical interest is also the question of the possibility of applying restraint periods when canceling decisions on citizenship issues.

Health 2020: European health and well-being policy. It focuses on supporting the actions of governments and society in the direction of significantly improving the health and well-being of the population; reducing the level of inequality in receiving medical services; promoting the health of everyone; ensuring that the health care system is "human-centred". The position of the World Health Organization is unequivocal – "the most important general health issue internationally" is patient safety (an integral component of service quality). It was proven that the reduction in the number of medical errors and similar health-related situations is the result of the integration and coordination of services through the participation of patients and consumers of medical services. The purpose of the paper is to investigate and compare the features of tort liability of medical workers under the legislation of Ukraine and the standards of the World Health Organisation. Our research is based on such methods as comparative legal method, method of analysis, formal legal method, as well as bibliographic method. Semasiology of the concept of "tort liability" for health professionals in Ukraine has differences in comparison with the WHO standards. Accordingly, the level of patient safety in Ukraine is such that needs to be improved to meet international standards.

The article discusses the problems of protecting climate rights, possible ways to establish climate rights and obligations in Russian legislation. The purpose of the article is to develop scientifically based approaches on the possibility of consolidating the climate rights and obligations of citizens and other legal entities in Russian legislation. To achieve this goal, it is necessary to solve the following tasks: to study Russian legislation, legislation of foreign countries, legal literature, judicial practice on the establishment and protection of climate rights; to establish the relationship between environmental and climate rights and obligations; preparation of proposals for the normative consolidation of climate rights and obligations in the legislation of the Russian Federation. The following methods were used in the research: methods of analysis and synthesis, comparative legal method, formal legal method. The authors come to the conclusion that the absence of enshrined climate human rights in the legislation of foreign countries does not prevent their judicial protection at the national and international levels. There are several options for establishing climate rights and obligations in the legal system of the Russian Federation: establishment of climate rights as a new type of human rights (everyone’s right to a favorable climate); the inclusion of the climate component in the concept of the right to a favorable environment and the obligation to protect the environment; the inclusion of the climate component in other constitutional human rights (the right to life, the right to housing, the right to health protection); establishment of the climate responsibility of public authorities to take technologically feasible and economically sound measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and adapt to negative climate changes. The article identifies seven challenges affecting the establishment of climate rights and obligations: the transboundary nature of climate change, the inertial nature of climate change, in which the climate system slowly reacts to changing factors of influence, including the level of greenhouse gas emissions, the amount of responsibility for non-fulfillment of commitments at the international level, responsibility for personal carbon footprint, climate migration, vulnerability of certain categories of the population (women, children, indigenous peoples), climate justice.

The subject of study. The article examines certain aspects to realize freedom of thought and expression, as well as the acceptable limits. Freedom of thought, speech and expression issues are considered separately in the context of the religious component, its characteristics in the Islamic religion. The provisions of the main sources in the Muslim system of law – the Holy Quran and the Sunnah of the Prophet and Messenger of Muhammad (May Allah bless him) have been studied in sufficient details. The legal analysis on the issues under consideration was carried out based on doctrinal opinions, the current Russian and international legal acts, judicial practice, including the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. The article describes extremism through the prism of freedom of thought, speech and expression. It is noted that extremist activity is one of the consequences of misinterpretation, true awareness and perception of freedom of thought, speech and expression.The purpose of the study. The main purpose of the study is to clarify the origins of conflicts in the process of realizing freedom of thought, speech and expression, and substantiate the hypothesis that freedom of thought, speech and expression should have certain boundaries, especially in context of the influence of the religious factor.The methodology of the study. The study is based on a dialectical approach to the disclosure of legal phenomena and processes using general scientific methods (systemic method, logical method, method of analysis and synthesis) and special scientific methods. Among the latter there are formal legal method, linguistic method, comparative legal method, which have found their application in the legal analysis to realize freedom of thought, speech and expression.Conclusions. As a result, it is emphasized that freedom of thought, speech and expression is the achievement of modern mankind, one of the foundations of a democratic system and an element of civil society. The state-guaranteed opportunity for individuals to exercise these freedoms in society is a guarantee of a "healthy" society in the legal sense. However, as practice shows, unlimited freedom leads to its abuse, thereby infringing on the freedoms of other individuals and therefore, freedom of speech and its expression presupposes the existence of boundaries outlined by the state in the interests of society. The specifics of freedom of thought, speech and expression in the Muslim system of law based on the Holy Quran and the Sunnah of the Prophet (May Allah bless him), is that this freedom ends where the border line begins, designated by the law of the Most High.

In this study, the author addresses the problem of the definition and structure of the right to religious autonomy. The object of the study was the content of the two manifestations of this right that the author identified: internal governance and doctrinal autonomy in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. The aim of this article is to determine the main areas of protection of the right to religious autonomy of religious associations and the positive experience applicable in the Russian Federation. The author describes the role of the right to religious autonomy, which is an integral part of pluralism in a democratic society and, therefore, acts as a center for protection provided by freedom of conscience. The study is based on the theoretical material of the works of both Russian (P.V. Sergeev, Yu.E. Fedotova, M.O. Shakhov) and foreign (M.E. Chopko, M.F. Moses) researchers. The extensive law enforcement practice of the European Court of Human Rights and the regulations of the European Union are also used. The methodological basis of the study is dialectical, comparative legal, formal legal, and other methods. In particular, the use of the dialectical method helped to determine the content of the concept of the right to religious autonomy, to study the dynamics of the legal positions of the European Court of Human Rights regarding a “balanced approach” to protect the autonomy of the internal management of religious associations. The use of comparative legal and formal legal methods helped to identify correlations between the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights and acts adopted within the European Union. The use of the functional method made it possible to investigate the place and role of European institutions and the nature of their governing influence on the provision and protection of the right to religious autonomy to various religious associations, including those representing a religious minority. As a result, the author comes to the conclusion that religious autonomy in its two possible manifestations—internal governance and doctrinal autonomy—directly follows from the content of the powers of freedom of conscience. Both of the manifestations are protected by European regulations although such protection cannot be considered as absolute. On the one hand, the right to religious autonomy is an integral part of the external manifestation of religious beliefs; on the other, its universal protection will jeopardize the protection of the rights of others. Nevertheless, in a situation in which the governing influence of European states is limited and the enforcement practice of the European Court of Human Rights is not entirely consistent, it seems that European institutions are aware of the importance of the right to religious autonomy. Therefore, the authorities resolve problems associated with its implementation pragmatically, trying to balance it with other rights and legitimate interests.

Goal. The purpose of the article is to analyze the key terms of the Law of Ukraine “On Administrative Procedure”, especially new for Ukrainian legislation, which will contribute to ensuring legal certainty, unity of understanding of such categories for the purposes of administrative and judicial practice. It is worth noting that although the purpose of this work is devoted to the outline of the main terms of the Law of Ukraine “On Administrative Procedure”, they are important for Ukrainian legislation as a whole, given the fundamental nature of this law. Method. The methodology includes a complex analysis of the issues, theoretical elaboration of the current legal material on the raised issue and formation of relevant conclusions and recommendations. During the study, the following methods of scientific knowledge were used: terminological, systemic-structural, comparative-legal, and the method of analysis. The results. Based on the results of the research, the importance of ensuring proper legal understanding of the provisions of the Law of Ukraine “On Administrative Procedure” for its further effective legal application was revealed, the main novelties in terminology were analyzed and the importance of further scientific work on the analysis of both the provisions of the Law itself and the results of its legal application was noted. Separately, the historical component of the adoption of the Law of Ukraine “On Administrative Procedure” is briefly described, and attention is drawn to the relevant regulatory documents that became the “legal foundation” for its adoption. Emphasis is placed on the importance of legal analysis of the provisions of this legislative act, including monitoring the results of its application in practice. The presented analysis of individual terms of the normative legal act proved that legal regulation in the field of administrative procedure has deep roots, which, in turn, can serve as a basis for work in the direction of increasing theoretical studies in this field. Scientific news. The study emphasized the importance of the adoption of the Law of Ukraine “On Administrative Procedure”, its significance both for the legal system of Ukraine as a whole and separately in the field of administrative procedure. The article analyzes the main provisions of the Law of Ukraine “On Administrative Procedure” from the point of view of novelties in terminology. Emphasis is placed on the fact that the procedure of interaction between the state, on the one hand, and citizens and business, on the other, should become unified, effective and, of course, transparent, with an orientation to the interests of the latter. It was found that the implementation of the general administrative procedure at the legislative level has undoubtedly brought Ukraine closer to the standards of the European Union, because the “right to proper administration” is an integral part of a highly developed legal state. Practical significance. The result of this work is aimed at further encouraging an in-depth theoretical study of the field of administrative procedure as a “novel of Ukrainian legislation” and finding ways to effectively implement the Law of Ukraine “On Administrative Procedure” into the legal realities of our country today. In the process of consideration of amendments to the legislation, a generalization of the key terminology was carried out, the understanding of which will make it possible to effectively implement the regulatory act in practice.

The article examines the content of theoretical and legal discussions regarding the concepts of «public order» and «public safety», analyzes various scientific approaches to these terms. The relevance of this scientific work is determined, firstly, by the increasing challenges and threats to the public security of the Russian Federation in modern socio- political realities. Secondly, there is still a wide pluralism of opinions in the scientific community regarding the content and correlation of these important legal phenomena. The main general scientific method of this research was dialectical, the application of which allowed for a comprehensive examination of public order and public safety as a state-legal phenomenon. The logical method in solving research problems consisted in applying the principles of formal logic to the explanation of legal conflicts. The use of the system analysis method contributed to the awareness of public order and public safety as complex systems in their internal structure, consisting of mutually related elements of legal theory and legal practice. Of the special methods of scientific research, the formal legal method has found application. Based on it, a study of legal events and textual sources was conducted, revealing various aspects and aspects of public order and public safety. This made it possible for the authors to interpret them in a logical sequence based on the use of special legal terms and formal constructions. The comparative legal method has taken a large place in solving the set research tasks. Thanks to the appeal to him, it became possible to systematically and comprehensively study the practice of ensuring public order and identifying the specifics of protecting public safety in various periods of the development of Russian statehood. Based on the understanding of the opinions common in Russian legal science, certain distinctive features of these concepts are highlighted. Based on the conducted research, it is stated that there is no unified approach to understanding the concept of «public safety» by domestic legal scholars. It is proved that the synthesizing components of the various formulations of these definitions are the recognition of the existence of an inextricable link between the rule of law, legality and lawful behavior of participants in certain legal relations.

In the article research of concept «business reputation» is carried out legal entities as participants of public relations. It is set that the row of the personal unproperty rights for legal entities, among that and right on inviolability of business reputation of legal entities, is envisaged in the article 94 of the Civil code of Ukraine. It is educed that business reputation is the personal unproperty blessing of legal entities. At the same time in the Civil code of Ukraine absent determination of concept «business reputation» legal entities, that causes a necessity to set forth such determination and offer him legislatively to fasten in the Civil code of Ukraine. It is set that the scientific association of Ukraine did not go round attention this question and offered a few variants of determination of concept «business reputation» legal entities. Supreme court of Ukraine in resolution of Plenum ВСУ from 27.02.2009 №1 also set forth own determination of this concept, in accordance with that business reputation is an estimation of entrepreneurial, public, professional or other activity of legal entities, that is carried out by such persons as participants of public relations. On the basis of this determination the improved variant of concept «business reputation» is offered, namely: «positive estimation of entrepreneurial, public, professional or other activity of legal entities, that is carried out by such persons as participants of public. Just the same determination of concept of business reputation it is suggested to fasten in the Civil code of Ukraine. It is well-proven that the negative estimation of activity of legal entities testifies to absence of business reputation for such legal entities. It is also set that business reputation is presumption of law, that is assumed after every legal entity. As well as any other presumption of law, a presence for the legal entity of business reputation can be refuted in the judicial order by establishment of negative estimation of activity of such legal entity.

The subject of the research is the relationship between cassational and supervisory proceedings in the criminal process of the Russian Federation, as well as their normative fixation, functional role, and actual demand in the system of stages for reviewing judicial decisions. Special attention is given to how these institutions implement the constitutional right to judicial protection, ensure the legality and fairness of justice, and prevent judicial errors. The research covers both the historical and legal evolution of the domestic model of cassational and supervisory appeals, as well as contemporary discussions related to their autonomy and the rationality of their existence. Furthermore, the analysis includes foreign approaches to organizing judicial control, which allows for a comparison and assessment of the possibility of implementing certain elements of foreign experience into Russian practice. The methodological framework of the study includes comparative legal, historical legal, systemic, formal legal, and statistical methods, which have allowed tracing the evolution of cassational and supervisory proceedings, comparing them with foreign models, analyzing legislation, judicial practices, and statistics of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. The scientific novelty of the research is expressed in a comprehensive understanding of the current relationship between cassational and supervisory proceedings in the criminal process of the Russian Federation. Unlike most existing works, which focus on normative differences between these stages, this article emphasizes their actual demand and real role in judicial practice. For the first time, based on the analysis of the statistics from the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, it is argued that supervision has lost the signs of substantive autonomy and duplicates the cassational mechanism. It is shown that its preservation hinders the formation of a rational model of judicial control, creates excessive procedural levels, and does not ensure a qualitatively new level of rights protection. A separate aspect of novelty is the comparison of the Russian model with foreign approaches, which has previously been considered only fragmentarily in the scientific literature. Such analysis has revealed the advantages of a three-tier system for reviewing judicial decisions – appeal, cassation, final decision. On this basis, a proposal for legislative reform aimed at abandoning supervision and strengthening cassation as a key institution for correcting judicial errors and ensuring the unity of judicial practice is justified.

The subject of the present study is the institution of special complicity in terrorist activities as a comprehensive legal category, which includes legal regulation, doctrinal approaches to defining the boundaries and forms of special complicity, law enforcement practices, and comparative legal aspects. The goal of the research is dual in nature. The scientific-analytical component includes the systematization of existing theoretical approaches to understanding special complicity in terrorist activities, identification of gaps and conflicts in modern legal regulation, and analysis of the transformation of forms of complicity under the conditions of digitalization of criminal activities. The relevance of the research is due to the need to develop unified qualification criteria that would ensure adequate criminal-law assessment of the actions of accomplices, exclude unfounded liability, and enhance the effectiveness of international cooperation in combating terrorism. The study is based on comparative legal, formal legal, and criminological methods. Norms of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, judicial practices, international acts, and doctrinal approaches of domestic and foreign researchers have been analyzed. As a result of the study, contradictions in judicial practices regarding the qualification of aiding have been identified. Deficiencies in legislative regulation have been established: the lack of clear criteria for distinguishing between general and special complicity and gaps in the assessment of indirect assistance. A comparative analysis of legal models (Russian, European, American) revealed the need for a balance between the effectiveness of criminal prosecution and the protection of citizens' rights. The results may be used in: the improvement of Article 205.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation; in law enforcement practices (development of methodological recommendations for investigative bodies and courts); in international cooperation to combat terrorism. As conclusions, specific measures for improving legislation have been proposed: 1) introduction of an exhaustive list of forms of aiding in the annotation to Article 205.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation; 2) differentiation of liability taking into account the degree of involvement; 3) harmonization with international standards.

The author studied the formation and development of the doctrine of heirless (vacant) succession in Ukraine. It has been determined that the probate law in Ukraine, as well as other legal phenomena, has followed its evolution, development and enrichment upon various historical stages of Ukrainian people and was closely tied with the existence or absence of Ukrainian statehood. The modern standards in this particular field of legal relations have been gradually established. The Kyiv State did not have the institution of heirless property because household assets of the ancient Ruthenian family were in collective property of the whole family and not in the property of an individual father-householder. That is why it was not succession but a mere redistribution of household assets remaining in joint possession within the family. The term «heirless property» was first specified in Lithuanian-Ruthenian state in Lithuanian Statutes (1566): if there were no heirs-at-law and by will, the property was acknowledged as heirless and devolved upon the state. For the legal system of Hetmanship era the primary source was the ancestral character of succession and devolution of the inheritable property to a public entity was an exception. Moreover, in Ukrainian legal tradition, the visible is the competition between acknowledging a vacant succession as an heirless property and extension of the institution of succession upon these relations. In Ukrainian SSR heirless succession devolved upon state. Modern civil law of Ukraine lacks the concept of heirless property (succession). The new Civil Code of Ukraine (2003) introduces the concept of «heirless succession» (Art. 1277). Ukrainian law applies European and international norms and standards. Along with this, the process must comply with the legal mentality of the Ukrainian people, with values and authenticity of its legal culture. Having adopted the Civil Code, Ukraine made and important step to the integration into the continental legal system, and the probate law acquired a new concept of heirless succession, when: firstly, available succession may be declared in judicial proceeding as heirless, and after that it devolves upon territorial community where it was commenced; secondly, the state is excluded both from the circle of heirs-at-law and from the circle of the entities-heirs of the succession acknowledged as heirless. The author specifies that the Ukrainian legislators did not take into account the Euroean experience during codification of the civil legislation, hence there are a number of issues that must be dealt with, so that Ukrainian legal system could completely meet the international standards. In EU countries the holder of the right for the heirless property is the state, in Ukraine it is a territorial community which outweighs the efficiency of the function of non-subjectivity elimination what heirlessness is intended for. Since a territorial community does not and cannot own so much civil capacity as the state. The author reveals some drawbacks in legal regulation of the issue and develops proposals to improve the probate law in Ukraine. Key words: succession, heirlessness, heirless property, legator, legatee, territorial community.

In the process of building a democratic state governed by the rule of law, ensuring the effectiveness of mechanisms for control and supervision over public authorities is a key prerequisite for transparent and accountable governance. This article aims to analyze the legal essence, structure, and challenges of implementing such mechanisms in Ukraine, while formulating conceptual proposals for their improvement to strengthen the overall system of public administration. The research employs comparative legal and formal legal methods, analyzing constitutional and legislative provisions, government resolutions, and judicial practices, complemented by a systemic-structural approach that views control and supervision as integral components of a unified governance framework. The study’s novelty lies in a refined conceptual differentiation between “control” and “supervision,” emphasizing their distinct legal nature and functional roles: control as an instrument of management and enforcement, and supervision—particularly prosecutorial—as a mechanism for ensuring legality and constitutional compliance. The research identifies several systemic issues, including terminological inconsistencies, overlapping competencies, and procedural fragmentation, which reduce administrative efficiency and blur institutional accountability. To address these challenges, the article proposes a set of optimization measures: the harmonization of legal norms, simplification of administrative procedures, decentralization of supervisory functions, and the digitalization of oversight processes through unified electronic registers. The proposed reforms aim to improve transparency, predictability, and coherence in public administration, ultimately enhancing legal certainty and strengthening the institutional foundations of Ukraine’s democratic governance.

The relevance of the research topic is due to the need to analyse the experience of regulatory definition of administrative procedures in foreign countries. It characterizes models of systematizing procedural legislation in certain developed countries worldwide and in Ukraine. Emphasis is placed on Ukraine adopting a model of systematizing administrative procedural legislation that involves the adoption of a general act on administrative procedure with the preservation of the priority of special legislation. This approach aligns with the recommendations of the institutions of the Council of Europe and the European Union, particularly Recommendation CM/Rec(2007)7 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe of June 20, 2007, to member states on good administration, and the European Parliament Resolution of January 15, 2013, with recommendations from the Commission on Administrative Procedure Law in the European Union. The latter document envisages that the general act on administrative procedure should contain a universal set of principles and outline a procedure applicable as de minimis provisions when there is no lex specialis. The purpose of the article is to reveal the peculiarities of legal regulation of administrative procedures under the laws of foreign countries. It is argued that updated legislation should include referral norms that clearly address the legal practitioner (other subjects endowed with administrative-procedural legal status) to a specific procedure defined by sectoral legislation. This is particularly relevant to cases handled by administrative authorities on their own initiative. The study uses the comparative legal method to establish the common and distinctive features of legal regulation of administrative and procedural legislation of foreign countries. The author examines the peculiarities of legal regulation of administrative procedures in certain European countries. It is noted that the implementation of legislation on administrative procedure in Ukraine should be carried out using the existing experience of countries where the relevant changes have already been implemented. It is emphasized that in the future, attention should be focused on the formation of a homogeneous national law enforcement practice, which is determined by a unified approach to the interpretation of procedural law. Based on the study, the author formulates the following conclusions and makes recommendations: at the initial stage, it is worthwhile to establish communication between representatives (officials) of administrative bodies and judges of administrative courts with a view to taking a number of measures to ensure effective implementation of domestic administrative procedure legislation; to ensure data exchange within the administration and to identify practical problems which may arise in the process of harmonization of the entire array of legal acts around the basic Law of Ukraine "On Administrative Procedure".