Образ Румунії в українських підручниках з історії для 10–11 класів (видання 2018–2019 років)

This paper investigates how ‘civil revolution’ is treated in the world history curriculum and textbooks. Status of civil revolution in the world history curriculum has been firmly held in both the material and chapter organization aspects, and the interpretation has been sticking to traditional one centered at British, American, and French revolution. Textbook treatments also have naturally followed the precedent ways. The descriptions of civil revolution are known to be too succinct and superficial, and sometimes erroneous. Moreover, usual textbooks summarize the views presented in Introductory of Western History(『西洋史槪論』) while emphasizing the positive aspects. Formalized descriptions of civil revolution in the world history curriculum and textbooks are attributed to the status of so-called orthodox theory in academia, and how importantly recognized the development process of democracy is among the topics of world history course. In particular, even ‘new world history’ discourse which raises doubt on Eurocentrism takes the historical status of civil revolution at a face value. In conclusion, we must try to transform the shape of absolutized civil revolution in the current world history course in order to overcome the Eurocentrism. However, as the objective of world history course is strongly connected to presentation of how the modern world had formed, it is quite hard to change the current status of Eurocentrism and civil revolution in the curriculum and textbooks. So we have to come up with fresh ways to replace current world history curriculum such as ‘western history as regional history’ or ‘the history of democracy as the topical history’.

The universality versus culture specificity of quantitative evaluations (negative-positive) of 40 events in world history was addressed using World History Survey data collected from 5,800 university students in 30 countries/societies. Multidimensional scaling using generalized procrustean analysis indicated poor fit of data from the 30 countries to an overall mean configuration, indicating lack of universal agreement as to the associational meaning of events in world history. Hierarchical cluster analysis identified one Western and two non-Western country clusters for which adequate multidimensional fit was obtained after item deletions. A two-dimensional solution for the three country clusters was identified, where the primary dimension was historical calamities versus progress and a weak second dimension was modernity versus resistance to modernity. Factor analysis further reduced the item inventory to identify a single concept with structural equivalence across cultures, Historical Calamities, which included man-made and natural, intentional and unintentional, predominantly violent but also nonviolent calamities. Less robust factors were tentatively named as Historical Progress and Historical Resistance to Oppression. Historical Calamities and Historical Progress were at the individual level both significant and independent predictors of willingness to fight for one’s country in a hierarchical linear model that also identified significant country-level variation in these relationships. Consensus around calamity but disagreement as to what constitutes historical progress is discussed in relation to the political culture of nations and lay perceptions of history as catastrophe.

The article focuses on the impact of transformations in exhibition spaces on the formation of national cultural identity in Ukrainian society during the Russian-Ukrainian war. The research methodology is based on a systematic approach used to highlight the peculiarities of the formation of the exhibition and exposition space of Ukraine in the period from 2014 to 2024. Among the main methods used are the method of definitional analysis to analyze the concept of national and cultural identity, the method of source research and the method of comparative analysis to compare the state of the exhibition and exhibition space of Ukraine in the specified period. The scientific novelty is that it deepens the understanding that the transformations of the Ukrainian exhibition space in 2014-2024 caused by the Russian-Ukrainian war are becoming an important factor in the formation of national and cultural identity by promoting national unity and identification of Ukrainians with a particular nation. Conclusions. At the present stage, it can be stated that the transformations of the Ukrainian exhibition space in 2014-2024 have a significant impact on the formation of national and cultural identity. The consolidation of Ukrainians during the Russian-Ukrainian war is largely reflected in the works of artists who, despite wartime, actively present their work, which reflects the national culture of Ukrainians and the consequences of Russia's destruction of our country's cultural values. The themes of the Revolution of Dignity, Russian aggression, occupation of Crimea, events in Donbas and the full-scale invasion have gained particular importance in the cultural sphere and are now widely covered at art exhibitions, where visitors have the opportunity to feel their belonging to the Ukrainian nation through familiarization with the national culture and understanding the importance of preserving it during the Russian-Ukrainian war. Keywords: culture, national and cultural identity, exhibition space, personality, Ukrainian art, values.

Epidemiology is the key arm of public health that studies the pattern and distribution of disease at the population level. A central model employed by modern epidemiologists to explain the occurrence of disease is the epidemiological triangle (or triad), which refers to the shifting interrelationship between pathogen, host, and the environment. Epidemiologists also study the occurrence of disease based on the idea of risk factors, which can be genetic, environmental, or behavioral. Working in local, national, and global settings, epidemiologists are critical for informing public health policy decisions, including public health preparedness, epidemic modeling, and epidemic response, which includes field-based outbreak investigation. The remit of the discipline of epidemiology, in other words, is preparing for future disease outbreaks, managing current endemic disease threats, and stepping in when outbreaks occur. Historical epidemiology, on the other hand, looks to the past to answer pressing questions about the future, seeking to integrate the traditional purview of epidemiology with historical and anthropological methodologies, demography (the study of populations), data science, ecology, environmental studies, and, increasingly, genomics and evolutionary biology. As a deeply multidisciplinary pursuit, and one that is closely allied with global health history, historical epidemiology asks questions about how disease outbreaks in the past have impacted populations, on the one hand, and, crucially, how public health interventions and changes in the environment have mitigated or sometimes intensified the spread of disease. This makes historical epidemiology different from the social and cultural history of medicine, which has long been interested in three questions: the formation and stabilization of disease categories, what diseases meant to people at a given time in the past, and why populations responded to epidemics in the way that they did. Historical epidemiology, however, is interested not just in what responses to disease were elicited in the past but also to the impact of these responses over time on changing morbidity and mortality patterns. Historical epidemiology thus brings in biological and biomedical understandings to nuance the past human response to disease, allowing for innovative spatial and temporal mapping of disease patterns onto social and political events in world history. This article contains sections that explore the key themes in the historiography, methods, and scope of historical epidemiology as it emerged in the 1970s within the domain of world history; was influenced by the social history of medicine and demography in the 1980s and 1990s; and then turned toward global history, environmental history, and genetics in recent years. The article also contains case studies, themes, and special topics of concern for methodological innovations in historical epidemiology that were spurred by ongoing debate about the Epidemiological Transition: the impact of disease prevention strategies, the role of therapeutics, and contemporary disease challenges of emerging and reemerging infectious diseases. Additionally, the article examines new frontiers in the field.

The evolution of Greece’s position on the Russian-Ukrainian war is analyzed and the main directions of political, military, humanitarian and diplomatic support for Ukraine from Athens are identified. It is found that Greek foreign policy is based on the principles of international law, solidarity with democratic states and the desire to ensure stability in the Southern Balkans and Eastern Mediterranean region. Ukrainian-Greek relations have a long history and are based on strong historical, cultural and spiritual ties. It is established that since the beginning of Russian aggression against Ukraine in 2014, Greece has taken a clear position in favor of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine. The impact of Russian propaganda on Greece is analyzed. It was determined that the full-scale Russian aggression against Ukraine, in particular the barbaric destruction of the city of Mariupol together with its inhabitants in the spring of 2022 and the destruction of many Greek settlements in the Donbas, played a significant role in changing Greece’s position on the Russian-Ukrainian war. It was established that in the context of the protracted Russian-Ukrainian war, the weakening of transatlantic security ties as a result of the activities of the current D. Trump administration and the constant threat from Turkey, Greece has planned a radical renewal and modernization of the armed forces for 25 billion euros, which will be spent over the next 10 years. The priorities of the said plan will be the development of long-range missile systems on autonomous mobile platforms, the use of artificial intelligence algorithms, unmanned technologies and new control systems, and the improvement of anti-missile, anti-air and anti-drone defense systems. The participation of Greece in the Ramstein format, in the programs of the European Union and NATO, as well as the significance of the signing of the Agreement on Security Cooperation between Ukraine and Greece in 2024, is revealed. The conclusion is made that the position of Athens combines a principled commitment to democratic values with a pragmatic consideration of regional and security interests.

The work of "us and the other" in the history textbook researches is one of the topics that attracted the attention of the researchers recently. In this research, “Us and the other” sample tried to determine how Iran and relations with Iran are explained in high school history textbooks taught in Turkey and how Turks and relations with Turks are explained in the high school history text book which was taught in Iran. The study was a qualitative research and document and record examination methods and techniques were used. The texts in Turkish history textbooks and Iranian history textbooks were examined using "Historical Abuse Methods". In the content of the texts in the history textbook titled "Iran and World History", which was taught in the 3rd grade class in General High School in Iran, the historical abuse methods with the Turks and relations with Turks was processed by using misleading, jumping and denying methods. Secondary education in Turkey "History 9th grade", "History 10th grade" “Contemporary Turkish and World History "textbooks on Iranian History and Iranian history textbooks were explored by using the jump method from historical abuse methods. ÖzetTarih ders kitapları araştırmalarında “biz ve öteki” çalışmaları son dönemlerde araştırmacıların ilgisini çeken konulardan biridir. Bu araştırmada biz ve öteki örnekleminde İran’da okutulan lise tarih ders kitabında Türkler ve Türklerle olan ilişkiler ile Türkiye’de okutulan lise tarih ders kitaplarında İran ve İranla olan ilişkilerin nasıl anlatıldığı tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Çalışma nitel bir araştırma olup doküman ve belge incelemesi yöntem ve teknikleri kullanılmıştır. Türk tarih ders kitapları ile İran tarih ders kitaplarında yer alan metinler “Tarihi Kötüye Kullanma Yöntemleri” kullanılarak incelenmiştir. İran’da Genel Lise III. sınıf Edebiyat bölümünde okutulan “İran ve Dünya Tarihi” adlı tarih ders kitabındaki metinlerin içeriklerinde Türkler ve Türklerle İlişkiler tarihi kötüye kullanma yöntemlerinden yanıltma, atlama ve yadsıma yöntemi kullanılarak işlenmiştir. Türkiye’de ortaöğretim “Tarih 9. Sınıf”, “Tarih 10. Sınıf” ve “12. Sınıf Çağdaş Türk ve Dünya Tarihi” ders kitaplarındaki metin içeriklerinde İran Tarihi ve İranla ilişkiler tarihi kötüye kullanma yöntemlerinden atlama yöntemi kullanılarak işlenmiştir.

Ukrainian Autonomous Republic of Crimea and then launched a war on Ukrainian territory in Donbass. Since then, the efforts of the Ukrainian state and society, the vast majority of the world community are aimed at restoring the territorial integrity of Ukraine, punishing Russia for its aggressive actions, compensating our state for the damage caused by this invasion. Thus, the research, coverage of the history and modernity of the Crimean issues are one of the most urgent tasks of the Ukrainian scientific and expert community. The Center for the Study of the History of the Turkish and Crimean Tatar Peoples of the Department of Modern and Contemporary History of Foreign Countries of the Faculty of History has a number of international scientific conferences, scientific and methodological seminars, round tables, exhibitions and presentations. Therefore, it is quite natural that the head of this Center, Associate Professor Oleh Romanovych Kupchyk, initiated a number of scientific and methodological seminars “Crimea in the coordinates of history.” It is noteworthy that this initiative arose and began to be implemented during the period of mass concentration of Russian troops on the Ukrainian borders and in fact in the most temporarily occupied Crimea, for a further attack on Ukraine, which eventually took place on February 24, 2022. The first scientific seminar was opened on May 20, 2021 by Inna Stepanets, Candidate of Geographical Sciences, Vice-Rector for Scientific and Pedagogical Work (Humanitarian Affairs) of the Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. The first section of this scientific event “Crimea in European / World History” opened with reports by Professor of the Department of Modern and Contemporary History of Foreign Countries of the Faculty of History Nataliia Gorodnia and Head of the same department, guarantor of the Bachelor educational program American Studies and European Studies (with in-depth study of foreign languages) Oleh Mashevskyi, who considered the US position on Russia’s actions in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea in February-March 2014 and, accordingly, the problem of annexation of Ukrainian Crimea by the Russian Federation in the policy of US Presidents B. Obama and D. Trump. In today’s world, the countries of the East are becoming increasingly geopolitically important, given their economic, demographic, and political potential. Therefore, the involvement of these states in the pro-Ukrainian policy of resisting Russian aggression, sanctioning the Kremlin, and supplying Ukraine with modern weapons is of paramount importance. Associate Professor of the Department of Modern and Contemporary History of Foreign Countries of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, guarantor of the Educational Program Oriental Studies of the Bachelor level Makar Taran in his reports discussed in detail the contexts of Crimea for China’s foreign policy after 2014. Oleh Kupchyk, Associate Professor of the Department of Modern and Contemporary History of Foreign Countries of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Guarantor of the Oriental Studies Educational Program of Master level, spoke about the position of the Republic of Turkey on the annexation of the Ukrainian Crimea by the Russian Federation. The reports of the second section “Crimea in the history of Ukraine” were quite interesting, first of all, which cover Crimean issues in the history of Ukraine in a global context. After an active discussion of Crimean issues in the history of Ukraine and the international context, which was joined by the President’s representative in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea Anton Korynevych, it was decided to publish a collection of scientific papers on the results of this scientific forum and hold a second thematic scientific seminar on Crimean issues in autumn 2021.

The article examines the role of political realism in U.S. debates on support for Ukraine during Russia’s war of aggression, outlining the key realist narratives that frame opposition to assistance to Kyiv. The purpose of the article is to analyze the views of American authors who identify themselves as political realists and to assess the internal coherence and empirical validity of their arguments, which portray support for Ukraine as contrary to U.S. national interests. In doing so, the article distinguishes between more ‘respectable’ realist claims circulating in Washington and explicitly propagandistic positions, and clarifies how these arguments translate into policy prescriptions. The methodological framework of the study is based on a combination of historiographical analysis and the comparative method. Historiographical analysis made it possible to evaluate the works produced by American political realists who examine U.S. policy toward Ukraine during the Russian-Ukrainian War. The comparative method is applied to determine the extent to which the policies of the Trump administration conformed to the core assumptions and dogmas of political realism. Scientific novelty. For the first time in Ukrainian historiography, a comprehensive analysis of the views of American authors who deny the necessity of providing aid to Ukraine during Russian aggression is conducted. Conclusions. Opponents of assistance to Ukraine during Russia’s aggression identify themselves as political realists. An analysis of their positions – ranging from apologists of so-called ‘Russian greatness’ to neo-isolationists – reveals a shared inability to perceive international realities, as well as a fundamental mismatch between artificially constructed dogmatic frameworks and the realities of the modern world. At the same time, it would be analytically inaccurate to classify all self-identified realists (as opposed to idealists) as ‘enemies of Ukraine’. A conditional category of ‘pro-Ukrainian’ realists may be identified as followers of the Brzezinski line. However, such figures were absent both within the Trump administration and among its MAGA supporters. In U.S. policy toward the Russian-Ukrainian war, Donald Trump positioned himself as a ‘Neanderthal’ political realist, whose approach reflected a simplified and reductionist interpretation of realism.

The confrontation between the diplomatic services of Napoleonic France and the Allied powers during the period of the Sixth Anti-French Coalition (1813–1814) still remains largely unknown not only to the general public but also to researchers of the Napoleonic Wars. The article analyzes the assessments of representatives of the initial stage of Soviet historiography of the history of the Napoleonic Wars regarding the confrontation between Napoleonic and Allied diplomacy of the specified period. Fulfilling a political order, Soviet historians from the second half of the 1930s, following the Russian-imperial authors, created a lot of myths and falsifications of the military and diplomatic history of the Napoleonic Wars, including this issue. Therefore, the deconstruction of the Soviet discourse, based on the mythologization of various events in world history, an objective reconstruction and a comprehensive analysis of the events of this period in the context of the current Russian-Ukrainian war, becomes quite important. The purpose of the article is to analyze the conclusions of the Soviet scientific work of the specified period regarding the confrontation between Napoleonic and Allied diplomacy during the military campaign of 1813–1814. The research methods involve systematic adherence to the principles of historicism and impartiality. Problem-chronological, comparative-historical methods with the use of historiographical analysis and a critical-analytical approach were applied. The scientific novelty of the article is determined by the fact that for the first time in modern domestic historiography, an attempt was made to analyze the conclusions of the representatives of the initial period of Soviet historiography regarding the methods and means used in the diplomatic confrontation between Napoleonic France and the Allied powers during the sixth anti-French coalition (1813–1814). The conclusions present the author’s assessment of historians of the first period of Soviet historiography regarding the confrontation between Napoleonic and Allied diplomacy in the specified period. It is established that the views of Soviet historians of this stage in covering the specified problem were based on the achievements of representatives of the critical trend of Russian historiography of the late 19th – early 20th centuries, whose conclusions in assessing the foreign policy and diplomacy of Napoleon Bonaparte were generally more objective than those of Russian historians of the 19th – early 20th centuries, who generally adhered to the patriotic concept.

Vladimir Kantor’s new book Demythologisation of Russian culture is concerned with interaction of world cultures and the turning points in the world history — the fall of the Roman Empire, World War I, Russian Revolution of 1917, etc. What drives the masses in times of war and revolutions; how mob mentality takes over society, and how the truth known to an individual defies widespread delusion; what is the nature of the myth and of the two principal events of world history — ‘the life and death of a living being’ — each of these questions receives an answer in seventeen essays on key figures of Russian culture: Peter I, A. Pushkin, I. Turgenev, F. Dostoevsky, A. Chernyshevsky, M. Katkov, A. Kerensky, M. Gorky et al. Published as an addendum to the book is Kantor’s short story ‘The death of a retiree’ [‘Smert pensionera’], supplied with a dedicated article ‘On the event of death’ by K. Barsht.

Humans responded to a climatically induced river avulsion in the Amu Darya delta beginning ca. 400 CE by re-engineering the river’s main channel to flow west of the Aral Sea. This change, which we refer to as the “Khorezmian pivot,” altered the cultural geography of the Aral Sea Basin (ASB) for over a millennium, influencing major events in world history including the formation of the Seljuk Empire in the 11 th century CE and the Mongol conquests of western Asia in the 13 th century CE. In this study, we present new radiocarbon dating and environmental data from the river-adjacent site of Sym-Ota 1 at the base of the Khorezmian pivot that indicates inhabitants were able to modify the main channel of the Amu Darya 700 years earlier than previously known, by ca. 300 BCE. This suggests that the hydromorphology of the Amu Darya delta has been shaped by over 2,000 years of human ecosystem engineering. The riparian agricultural strategies documented at Sym-Ota 1 were likely important features of adaptation to the 400 CE avulsion and the integration and maintenance of culture groups in the ASB such as the Seljuks and Mongols that played major roles in world history.

The article examines the peculiarities of forming the vision of regional history, which was presented in the textbooks of the socio-humanitarian block of the 1920s-1930s. The historiography of the issue is analyzed. Examining the vision of regional history in Soviet textbooks, the author touched on the problem of the Soviet school system functioning in general and the history lesson in particular. The main textbooks of the specified period, which are representative of the presented issues were also analyzed, because they concern secondary general schools, that is, those children who were the basis of the school education system. The article reveals the spatial vision presented in the work of M. Yavorsky "A Brief History of Ukraine" – the main textbook of that period. Among the regions distinguished by the Soviet information policy were: Ukraine as part of the USSR; Naddniprianshchyna with the main city Kyiv, Galicia, Volyn and Zakarpattya (Transcarpathia). Also, the peculiarity of the vision of regional history, which was formed at the beginning of the next decade, is revealed. It consisted in shifting the vector from the west to the eastern spaces – Russian lands. Kyiv as a regional center receded into the background, giving way to St. Petersburg and Moscow. The specified vision deepened even more at the end of the 1930s. Textbooks of that period almost did not describe Ukrainian lands, dividing them into two artificial regions, "Eastern and Western" Ukraine. Instead, the regional vision spread to Central Asia, Kazakhstan and the Caucasus.

In 2023, the Scientific Library of the Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine received books from the private library of our colleagues, O. V. Tsvek and I. I. Movchan. During the processing of these incomings, the attention was paid to the book Essay on the History of Ukraine. It was published by the Institute of History and Archaeology of Ukraine of the Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian RSR in 1942 in Ufa. The Academy’s institutes were evacuated there during the World War II. Authors of the book Essay on the History of Ukraine were the following scholars: K. H. Voblyi, K. H. Huslystyi, V. A. Diadychenko, F. Ye. Los, M. N. Petrovskyi, L. M. Slavin, M. I. Suprunenko and F. Yu. Sherstiuk. K. H. Huslystyi, L. M. Slavin and F. O. Yastrebov were the editors. At the time of the publication of this book, all of them were employees of the Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian RSR and were evacuated to Ufa. The book was bound in a soft cover and costed six karbovantsiv at the time of publication. The circulation of the publication was quite large — 5000 copies. However, this book became the first copy of this edition for the Scientific Library of the Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. It is important that the term “Ukraine”, not “the Ukrainian RSR”, was used in the title of the publication, and also the book was published in Ukrainian. The publication contains a preface and 19 chapters. On the title page of the book, there is the autograph of the first owner of this copy — O. F. Lahodovska. On the cover there is a simple pencil autograph of I. H. Shovkoplias. It is logical to assume that later the book became his property. Perhaps it happened during the years of his postgraduate studies or while he had been working at the Institute of Archaeology. The reason for this publication was the content of this book’s preface. The book impressed with its complete consonance with the present. If you replace the phrase «german-fascist invaders» with «russian invaders\rashysts», the rest of the text remains relevant and consistent with the current russian-Ukrainian war.

Based on theoretical and legal analysis, the article summarizes the peculiarities of police activity as a component of the security and defence sector during the period of russian aggression. It has been proved that despite the full-scale undeclared criminal invasion, the Armed Forces of Ukraine, with the strong financial and military support of Western partners, are victoriously overcoming the resistance of the russian occupiers and are carrying out a systematic counter-offensive against the "world's second victorious russian army", and at the same time, heroically destroying the enemy's military equipment and manpower on a daily basis, far-sightedly take strategic decisions on reforming the activities of public authorities, and especially of the security and defence sector. It has been determined that the formation and improvement of the security and defence sector of Ukraine has always been relevant, both in peacetime and in the current period of the russian invasion. At the same time, the doctrinal provisions on their legal status and its improvement in wartime remain insufficiently developed and require theoretical and practical in-depth research. The miscalculations, made in the organization of defence industry procurement, headed by the Ukroboronprom Defence Industrial Concern, have been outlined. However, since the beginning of February 2022, the state has adopted a number of legislative changes aimed at improving the Armed Forces of Ukraine current model, law enforcement agencies and the military-industrial complex, and bringing them in line with NATO and European Union standards. The state of the police as a security and defence sector entity during martial law proves that Ukrainian law enforcement officers, together with the Armed Forces of Ukraine, are boldly repelling the criminal russian attack, protecting the lives and health of the Ukrainian population, defending the territorial integrity and independence of Ukraine. It has been stated that one of the important factors in optimizing the activities of the police during the war is the concern of the state authorities for improving their social protection. It has been noted that the police, in addition to performing own duties during martial law aimed at identifying and prosecuting criminals, searching for missing persons, and taking preventive measures to protect public order and security, carry out activities, related to the clearance of enemy mines by the National Police sappers, and the destruction of unexploded ordnance at the risk of life and health. According to statistics, about 50 specialists in pyrotechnics were killed, and more than 100 were injured during humanitarian demining. It has been stated that at the initiative of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, 8 assault brigades are currently being formed on the basis of the National Police, the State Border Guard Service and the National Guard: "Stalevy Kordon", "Chervona Kalyna", "Lyut’", "Rubizh", "Spartan", "Kara-Dag", "Bureviy" and "AZOV". The basis of the assault brigades will be really motivated and patriotic military personnel and former law enforcement officers. In addition, the main priority in ensuring the safe life of the population under martial law is to strengthen police cooperation with local governments and public organizations and to develop joint measures to protect public order and security. It has been noted that despite a number of regulations adopted during martial law aimed at improving the conditions of police service, there are still problems with the failure to resolve issues related to strengthening administrative and criminal liability for administrative offences and war crimes; abolition of the average salary at the place of work; unregulated procedure for serving a summons to territorial recruitment centres, etc. It has been proved that in the course of ensuring public order and security during the russian-Ukrainian war, the police in its professional activity uses not only organizational and legal forms and methods with wide participation of the security and defence forces, territorial defence and public formations, but also hone the skills in conducting operational and search activities aimed at combating crime and eliminating enemy sabotage groups, which enables solving the tasks set in countering russian aggression under martial law.

The article analyzes the main trends and characteristics of migration processes formed in Ukraine as a result of a large-scale Russian aggression which began on February 24, 2022. It is emphasized that the migration processes in Ukraine are in constant dynamics, affecting the pan-European migration picture. The methodological basis of this study is the theory of culture shock, cultural distance and adaptation psychology, scientific works on conflictology, studies of social exclusion and discrimination, concepts of ethno-cultural boundaries and social distance, political science research on risk factors and the functioning of diasporas. The article notes that the formation of migration sentiments in Ukrainian society was influenced by the growing social instability, starting with the Orange Revolution of 2004 and ending with the military actions in the territory of Ukraine in 2014-2024. Since 2014, a new social group has emerged in Ukraine – internally displaced persons (IDPs). The large-scale hostilities in Ukraine (since February 24, 2022) have led to a significant increase in the number of internally displaced persons and immigrants outside the country. The migration processes that have intensified in Ukraine as a consequence of the Russian aggression have had a significant impact on the socio-economic, political, legal, spiritual and cultural spheres both in Ukraine and in Europe as a whole. Overcoming the negative migration trends caused by the Russian-Ukrainian war requires of the state elaboration of a comprehensive, scientifically based strategy which will differ significantly, if the war continues, and after its end.