2000—2018年黄河流域生长季植被指数变化及其对气候因子的响应

In this paper, we investigate the features of spatiotemporal change in fractional vegetation cover (FVC) throughout the Yellow River Basin between 2000 and 2022 and identify the driving factors behind the change using the MODIS normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) as a data source. On that basis, our research involves trend analysis and the center migration model to examine the correlation between vegetation cover changes and various factors, such as climates, topographies, soils, and human activities. In this way, we aim to uncover how such correlation contributed to the reduction in suspended sediment concentration (SSC) in surface runoff. Results suggest that (1) the FVC of the Yellow River Basin has been trending upward over the past 23 years, and vegetation growth has been remarkably improved; (2) the center of medium-high and denser vegetation cover has progressively migrated from the upper reaches of the Yellow River down to its middle-lower segments; (3) soil erosion control measures are critical to improve vegetation cover, given the great impact of the shifting natural elements on vegetation cover changes on a local basis; (4) an improvement in vegetation cover leads to considerable positive change in the runoff and SSC of the Yellow River mainstem. This study has yielded noteworthy contributions in correctly understanding the current vegetation changes and related factors in the Yellow River Basin. Furthermore, it has laid the groundwork for further research in improving the accuracy of basic data and deepening the correlation between factors.

Hurricanes have significant consequences for ecosystems, potentially disrupting the carbon cycle at both local and regional scales and releasing carbon back into the atmosphere through storm-associated impacts on vegetation and agricultural areas. The present work analyzes the interactions amongst terrestrial carbon fluxes, rainfall, and land cover for three significant hurricanes: Harvey (Texas), Irma (Florida), and Maria (Puerto Rico). This study utilized net ecosystem exchange (NEE) data derived from the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) NASA satellite mission, which provides global estimates of soil moisture and carbon flux, and analyzed these data for coastal climate zones during the hurricane season. The results were validated using eddy covariance tower-based in-situ CO 2 flux observations during hurricane landfall. Results showed that southern Texas (Harvey) experienced the highest amount of carbon release (0.33 megatons), followed by Florida (Irma) (0.03 megatons) and Puerto Rico (Maria) (0.02 megatons). The land cover products, such as the National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD) and the Copernicus Global Land Service (CGLS), showed overall reductions in land cover in Florida (-1.02%), Texas (-0.97%), and Puerto Rico (-0.46%). Furthermore, vegetation cover changes were estimated using MODIS-derived enhanced vegetation index (EVI), showing major changes over Puerto Rico (-3.81%) and southeast Texas (-2.94%), while normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) showed more moderate reductions over Puerto Rico (-3.06%), southeast Texas (-1.12%), and Florida (-0.16%). These reductions indicate short-term vegetation stress and decreased photosynthetic activity, which may temporarily reduce carbon uptake, leading affected regions to transition from carbon sinks to temporary carbon sources. These findings highlight hurricanes as significant drivers of short-term carbon emissions and vegetation change. This study enhances understanding of hurricane-associated disturbances in the carbon cycle by examining spatial and temporal variations in carbon fluxes during extreme weather events. • The impacts of hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria (2017) on terrestrial carbon fluxes were assessed. • Carbon release during and after landfall was measured using SMAP-derived NEE and eddy covariance CO 2 flux data. • Hurricane Harvey resulted in the largest carbon emission (0.33 megatons), followed by Irma (0.03 megatons) and Maria (0.02 megatons). • Vegetation loss, derived from MODIS NDVI and land cover change products, was greatest in Texas (6,199.3 km 2 ), then Florida (492.92 km 2 ), and Puerto Rico (14.53 km 2 ). • Vegetation declines led to reduced photosynthetic activity, temporarily turning affected areas from carbon sinks into carbon sources. • Findings highlight hurricanes as significant short-term drivers of carbon emissions and ecosystem disturbance across coastal regions.

Quantifying the influences of factors on Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) changes is critical to understanding the functions of terrestrial ecosystems. However, identification of the causes responsible for vegetation changes is still limited. We applied the Geographic Detector to quantify the individual and interactive influences of human and natural factors on the change in the vegetation NDVI,and determined the optimal characteristics of factors that are beneficial to vegetation growth. Our results show that vegetation cover for 2000 and 2015 is in good condition, and regions with NDVI > 0.6 showed a significant transformation, whereas areas with mid-high vegetation or lower and areas with high vegetation increased and decreased, respectively. Vegetation cover changes were mainly in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River and its tributaries. We illustrated that the elevation, annual average temperature, and soil type can satisfactorily account for the vegetation changes with explanatory powers of 60%, 52% and 39% or larger, respectively. Land use types and distance from the road had enhanced influences in the NDVI changes with explanatory powers of less than 16% and 12%, respectively. We proposed that there are interactive effects between the impact factors on vegetation NDVI, and the synergistic effects of the impact factors showed mutual enhancement and nonlinear enhancement. The interaction between the two factors strengthens the influence of each individual factor on the vegetation changes. This study provides important references that policymakers can use to intervene and promote vegetation change for ecological protection and vegetation restoration, while alleviating environmental degradation.

Remote sensing methods are essential for environmental monitoring and assessment. They provide objective data on vegetation cover, enabling the de­tection of changes and evaluation of ecological processes. In Ukraine, located in a temperate climate zone, favorable conditions support vegetation growth and agricultural activities. However, the agricultural sector faces significant environmental challenges, such as climate change, soil degradation, and erosion. Monitoring these processes is crucial for sustainable land use and resource management. To assess changes in vegetation cover and their environmental impact, satellite remote sensing and spectral indices are commonly applied. Widely used indices include the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI), Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), and their modifications. These indices, however, have limitations, including sensitivity to soil background, atmospheric interferen­ce, and saturation at high vegetation densities. To address these limitations, a new index called EVI-S (Enhanced Vegetation Index — Soil Adjusted) has been proposed. It combines the strengths of SAVI and EVI2 while minimizing atmospheric interference. The primary goal is to develop and validate this new index to enhance ecological monitoring. The study area is the Feodosiivska territorial community in Kyiv region, which includes natural ecosystems and agri­cultural lands. The landscape is predominantly flat, typical of the forest-steppe zone. Sentinel-2 satel­lite images, processed using QGIS with the SCP plugin, provided data for calculating NDVI, EVI, EVI2, SAVI, and EVI-S indices. Results indicate that the EVI-S index shows higher maximum and average values compared to conventional indices, suggesting improved sensitivity to dense vegetation. Correlation analysis demonstrated that while traditional indices (EVI, EVI2, SAVI) show strong mutual correlation, NDVI displays slightly lower correlation due to satu­ration issues. Notably, EVI-S exhibits a high correla­tion with NDVI, indicating retained similarity despite improved formulation. EVI-S is particularly effec­tive in analyzing urban and mixed landscapes, where conventional indices may underestimate vegetation presence. Its wider dynamic range and increased sensitivity make it useful for monitoring vegetation growth and biomass, especially in forests and agri­cultural areas. Further studies are needed to assess its application in urban environments, where hetero­ geneous vegetation cover may impact accuracy. The findings demonstrate that EVI-S can complement traditional indices, offering enhanced sensitivity in contexts where accurate vegetation density analysis is necessary. Its practical application is promising for crop monitoring during growth periods and for evaluating dense forest areas.

It is very important to develop a rapid algorithm for rodent pest damage estimation,especially for an outbreak year. The Yangtze vole( Microtus fortis) has been identified as a primary rodent pest in the Dongting Lake region. In July2007,there was a sudden population explosion in that region,representing the most serious Yangtze vole disaster on record.More than two billion voles crossed the lake levee,causing massive crop damage. The study area of Beizhouzi,to the west of East Dongting Lake,was selected because it had the highest population density during the outbreak year. A difference method of vegetation index was used in the assessment,in which the outbreak year 2007 was contrasted with 2004,which was considered a normal year. All vegetation-index imagery was from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer( MODIS),which was masked by a land-use map of the study area to remove water bodies and urban and built-up lands.The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index( NDVI) in the outbreak year declined during the vegetation growth period,in contrast with the normal year. This NDVI change was a result of plant destruction by the Yangtze vole population. Regarding the local crop system,Julian days 193 and 209 were chosen for observations representative of before and after the Yangtzevole problem. Performances of the NDVI and enhanced vegetation index( EVI) were analyzed. ΔVI was defined as the ratio of a seasonally detrended vegetation index( VI) reduction before and after the Yangtze vole problem to seasonally detrended VI before the problem. Given the mean ΔVI,shift amplitude( the difference of ΔVI between 2004 and 2007),statistical dispersion( inter quartile range( IQR) of ΔVI in 2007),and percentage of detected damaged pixels,the damage threshold was defined as the sum of the mean ΔVI and mean absolute deviation. These were calculated to evaluate sensitivity of the vegetation index. The EVI was selected as the optimal vegetation index for detecting damaged area after sensitivity analysis.An ΔEVI of 0.07 was considered the damage threshold in the study area. The damage indicator was then rescaled to a range of 0 to 1,for constructing damage severity. The upper and lower limits for rescaling were determined by statistical analysis of the damage indicator,whose values were the 95% point of the ΔEVI histogram for the study area and the damage threshold.Only damage pixels greater than 0 after rescaling,and the 25% and 75% quantiles,were treated as thresholds for three damage levels( serious,moderate and light). As a result,the study area was separated into four groups,in which 80.30%of pixels were damaged. The damage pixels were aggregated according to the action of the Yangtze vole population during the outbreak year,and were dominated by moderate-damage pixels. There was a certain distance between the damage area and levee,which could been explained by the population migration. Pixels with serious damage were dispersed over the entire study area. We constructed a disaster region map for the Dongting Lake region in 2007,from investigation and the spatial distribution of damage pixels with the threshold 0.07. This map was used to validate the method of assessing outbreak-year rodent pest damage based on MODIS imagery. The new approach to evaluating rodent pest damage proved to be rapid and promising.

The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) are vegetation indices widely used in remote sensing of above-ground biomass. Because both indexes are based on spectral features of plant canopy, NDVI and EVI may suffer reduced accuracy in estimating above-ground biomass when flower signals are mixed in the plant canopy. This paper addresses how flowers influence the estimation of above-ground biomass using NDVI and EVI for an alpine meadow with mixed yellow flowers of Halerpestes tricuspis (Ranunculaceae). Field spectral measurements were used in combination with simulated reflectance spectra with precisely controlled flower coverage by applying a linear spectral mixture model. Using the reflectance spectrum for the in-situ canopy with H. tricuspis flowers, we found no significant correlation between above-ground biomass and EVI (p = 0.17) or between above-ground biomass and NDVI (p = 0.78). However, both NDVI and EVI showed very good prediction of above-ground biomass with low root mean square errors (RMSE = 43 g m−2 for NDVI and RMSE = 43 g m−2 for EVI, both p < 0.01) when all the flowers were removed from the canopies. Simulation analysis based on the in-situ measurements further indicated that high variation in flower coverage among different quadrats could produce more noise in the relationship between above-ground biomass and NDVI, or EVI, which results in an evident decline in the accuracy of above-ground biomass estimation. Therefore, the study suggests that attention should be paid both to the flower fraction and the heterogeneity of flower distribution in the above-ground biomass estimation via NDVI and EVI.

Vegetation indices (VIs) such as the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) are widely used for assessing vegetation cover and condition. One of the NDVI's significant disadvantages is its sensitivity to aerosols in the atmosphere, hence several atmospherically resistant VIs were formulated using the difference in the radiance between the blue and the red spectral bands. The state‐of‐the‐art atmospherically resistant VI, which is a standard Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) product, together with the NDVI, is the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI). A different approach introduced the Aerosol‐free Vegetation Index (AFRI) that is based on the correlation between the shortwave infrared (SWIR) and the visible red bands. The AFRI main advantage is in penetrating an opaque atmosphere influenced by biomass burning smoke, without the need for explicit correction for the aerosol effect. The objective of this research was to compare the performance of these three VIs under smoke conditions. The AFRI was applied to the 2.1 µm SWIR channel of the MODIS sensor onboard the Earth Observing System (EOS) Terra and Aqua satellites in order to assess its functionality on these imaging platforms. The AFRI performance was compared with those of NDVI and EVI. All VIs were calculated on images with and without present smoke, using the surface‐reflectance MODIS product, for three case studies of fires in Arizona, California, and Zambia. The MODIS Fire Product was embedded on the images in order to identify the exact location of the active fires. Although good correlations were observed between all VIs in the absence of smoke (in the Arizona case R 2 = 0.86, 0.77, 0.88 for the NDVI–EVI, AFRI–EVI, and AFRI–NDVI, respectively) under smoke conditions a high correlation was maintained between the NDVI and the EVI, while low correlations were found for the AFRI–EVI and AFRI–NDVI (0.21 and 0.16, for the Arizona case, respectively). A time series of MODIS images recorded over Zambia during the summer of 2000 was tested and showed high NDVI fluctuations during the study period due to oscillations in aerosol optical thickness values despite application of aerosol corrections on the images. In contrast, the AFRI showed smoother variations and managed to better assess the vegetation condition. It is concluded that, beneath the biomass burning smoke, the AFRI is more effective than the EVI in observing the vegetation conditions.

The rate of global urbanization is exponentially increasing and reducing areas of natural vegetation. Remote sensing can determine spatiotemporal changes in vegetation and urban land cover. The aim of this work is to assess spatiotemporal variations of two vegetation indices (VI), the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), in addition land cover in and around Erbil city area between the years 2000 and 2015. MODIS satellite imagery and GIS techniques were used to determine the impact of urbanization on the surrounding quasi-natural vegetation cover. Annual mean vegetation indices were used to determine the presence of a spatiotemporal trend, including a visual interpretation of time-series MODIS VI imagery. Dynamics of vegetation gain or loss were also evaluated through the study of land cover type changes, to determine the impact of increasing urbanization on the surrounding areas of the city. Monthly rainfall, humidity and temperature changes over the 15-year-period were also considered to enhance the understanding of vegetation change dynamics. There was no evidence of correlation between any climate variable compared to the vegetation indices. Based on NDVI and EVI MODIS imagery the spatial distribution of urban areas in Erbil and the bare around it has expanded. Consequently, the vegetation area has been cleared and replaced over the past 15 years by urban growth.

As a vital ecological barrier in China, Yellow River Basin (YRB) is strategically significant for China’s national development and modernization. However, YRB has fragile ecosystems, and is sensitive to climatic change. Extreme climate events (e.g., heavy precipitation, heatwaves, and extreme hot and cold) occur frequently in this basin, but the implications (positive and negative effects) of these events on vegetation dynamics remains insufficiently understood. Combing with net primary productivity (NPP), the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and extreme climate indexes, we explored the spatio–temporal characteristics of plants’ growth and extreme climate, together with the reaction of plants’ growth to extreme climate in the Yellow River Basin. This study demonstrated that annual NPP and NDVI of cropland, forest, and grassland in the study region all revealed a climbing tendency. The multi-year monthly averaged NPP and NDVI were characterized by a typical unimodal distribution, with the maximum values of NPP (66.18 gC·m−2) and NDVI (0.54) occurring in July and August, respectively. Spatially, multi–year averaged of vegetation indicators decreased from southeast to northwest. During the study period, carbon flux (NPP) and vegetation index (NDVI) both exhibited improvement in most of the YRB. The extreme precipitation indexes and extreme high temperature indexes indicated an increasing tendency; however, the extreme low temperature indexes reduced over time. NPP and NDVI were negatively associated with extreme low temperature indexes and positively correlated with extreme high temperature indexes, and extreme precipitation indicators other than consecutive dry days. Time lag cross–correlation analysis displayed that the influences of extreme temperature indexes on vegetation indexes (NPP and NDVI) were delayed by approximately six months, while the effects of extreme precipitation indexes were immediate. The study outcomes contribute to our comprehension of plants’ growth, and also their reaction to extreme climates, and offer essential support for evidence–based ecological management practices in the Yellow River Basin.

Vegetation indices play an important role in monitoring variations in vegetation. The Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) proposed by the MODIS Land Discipline Group and the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) are both global-based vegetation indices aimed at providing consistent spatial and temporal information regarding global vegetation. However, many environmental factors such as atmospheric conditions and soil background may produce errors in these indices. The topographic effect is another very important factor, especially when the indices are used in areas of rough terrain. In this paper, we theoretically analyzed differences in the topographic effect on the EVI and the NDVI based on a non-Lambertian model and two airborne-based images acquired from a mountainous area covered by high-density Japanese cypress plantation were used as a case study. The results indicate that the soil adjustment factor “L” in the EVI makes it more sensitive to topographic conditions than is the NDVI. Based on these results, we strongly recommend that the topographic effect should be removed in the reflectance data before the EVI was calculated—as well as from other vegetation indices that similarly include a term without a band ratio format (e.g., the PVI and SAVI)—when these indices are used in the area of rough terrain, where the topographic effect on the vegetation indices having only a band ratio format (e.g., the NDVI) can usually be ignored.

Estimating root zone soil moisture at distant sites using MODIS NDVI and EVI in a semi-arid region of southwestern USA

The suitability of using Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) images for surface soil moisture estimation to investigate the importance of soil moisture in different applications, such as agriculture, hydrology, meteorology and natural disaster management, is evaluated in this study. Soil moisture field measurements and MODIS images of relevant dates have been acquired. Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) and Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) are calculated from MODIS images. In addition, MODIS Land Surface Temperature (LST) data (MOD11A1) are used in this analysis. Four different soil moisture estimation models, which are based on NDVI–LST, EVI–LST, NDVI–LST–NDWI and EVI–LST–NDWI, are developed and their accuracies are assessed. Statistical analysis shows that replacing EVI with NDVI in the model that is based on LST and NDVI increases the accuracy of soil moisture estimation. Accuracy evaluation of soil moisture estimation using check points shows that the model based on LST, EVI and NDWI values gives a higher accuracy than that based on LST and EVI values. It is concluded that the model based on the three indices is a suitable model to estimate soil moisture through MODIS imagery.

Remotely-sensed Vegetation Indices (VIs) are often tightly correlated with terrestrial ecosystem CO2 uptake (Gross Primary Production or GPP). These correlations have been exploited to infer GPP at local to global scales and over half-hour to decadal periods, though the underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood. We used satellite remote sensing and eddy covariance observations at 10 sites across a California climate gradient to explore the relationships between GPP, the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and the Near InfraRed Vegetation (NIRv) index. EVI and NIRv were linearly correlated with GPP across both space and time, whereas the relationship between NDVI and GPP was less general. We explored these interactions using radiative transfer and GPP models forced with in-situ plant trait and soil reflectance observations. GPP ultimately reflects the product of Leaf Area Index (LAI) and leaf level CO2 uptake (Aleaf); a VI that is sensitive mainly to LAI will lack generality across ecosystems that differ in Aleaf. EVI and NIRv showed a strong, multiplicative sensitivity to LAI and Leaf Mass per Area (LMA). LMA was correlated with Aleaf, and EVI and NIRv consequently mimic GPP’s multiplicative sensitivity to LAI and Aleaf, as mediated by LMA. NDVI was most sensitive to LAI, and was relatively insensitive to leaf properties over realistic conditions; NDVI lacked EVI and NIRv’s sensitivity to both LAI and Aleaf. These findings carry implications for understanding the limitations of current VIs for predicting GPP, and also for devising strategies to improve predictions of GPP.

Abstract. Monitoring leaf phenology tracks the progression of climate change and seasonal variations in a variety of organismal and ecosystem processes. Networks of finite-scale remote sensing, such as the PhenoCam network, provide valuable information on phenological state at high temporal resolution, but they have limited coverage. Satellite-based data with lower temporal resolution have primarily been used to more broadly measure phenology (e.g., 16 d MODIS normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) product). Recent versions of the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES-16 and GOES-17) can monitor NDVI at temporal scales comparable to that of PhenoCam throughout most of the western hemisphere. Here we begin to examine the current capacity of these new data to measure the phenology of deciduous broadleaf forests for the first 2 full calendar years of data (2018 and 2019) by fitting double-logistic Bayesian models and comparing the transition dates of the start, middle, and end of the season to those obtained from PhenoCam and MODIS 16 d NDVI and enhanced vegetation index (EVI) products. Compared to these MODIS products, GOES was more correlated with PhenoCam at the start and middle of spring but had a larger bias (3.35 ± 0.03 d later than PhenoCam) at the end of spring. Satellite-based autumn transition dates were mostly uncorrelated with those of PhenoCam. PhenoCam data produced significantly more certain (all p values ≤0.013) estimates of all transition dates than any of the satellite sources did. GOES transition date uncertainties were significantly smaller than those of MODIS EVI for all transition dates (all p values ≤0.026), but they were only smaller (based on p value &lt;0.05) than those from MODIS NDVI for the estimates of the beginning and middle of spring. GOES will improve the monitoring of phenology at large spatial coverages and provides real-time indicators of phenological change even when the entire spring transition period occurs within the 16 d resolution of these MODIS products.

Vegetation indices have been widely used as indicators of seasonal and inter‐annual variations in vegetation caused by either human activities or climate, with the overall goal of observing and documenting changes in the Earth system. While existing satellite remote sensing systems, such as NASA's Multi‐angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR) and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), are providing improved vegetation index data products through correcting for the distortions in surface reflectance caused by atmospheric particles as well as ground covers below vegetation canopy, the impact of land‐cover mixing on vegetation indices has not been fully addressed. In this study, based on real image spectral samples for two‐component mixtures of forest and common nonforest land‐cover types directly extracted from a 1.1 km MISR image by referencing a 30 m land‐cover classification, the effect of land‐cover mixing on the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) has been quantitatively evaluated. When the areal fraction of forest was lower than 80%, both NDVI and EVI varied greatly with mixed land‐cover types, although EVI varied less than NDVI. Such a phenomenon can cause errors in applications based on use of these vegetation indices. This study suggests that methods that reduce land‐cover mixing effects should be introduced when developing new spectral vegetation indices.