• Home
  • Search
  • #3599 ADTKD diagnosis: an evolving challenge
  • https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfaf116.1036Copy DOI Icon

#3599 ADTKD diagnosis: an evolving challenge

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Abstract Background and Aims Autosomal dominant tubulointerstitial kidney disease (ADTKD) encompasses a group of hereditary kidney disorders characterized by tubulointerstitial fibrosis. These conditions typically follow an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern and are subclassified based on their genetic cause when identified. Pathogenic variants in UMOD, MUC1, REN, HNF1B, and SEC61A1 have been implicated in ADTKD pathogenesis. Advances in molecular diagnostics have improved genetic identification, though the true prevalence is likely underestimated. We present a cohort of ADTKD patients identified in the Nephrogenetics’ Clinic of our department between 2010 and 2024. Method Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) of unknown cause and undefined phenotype, or those exhibiting a renal phenotype suggestive of chronic interstitial nephritis, particularly with a family history of similar CKD, were referred to the Nephrogenetics’ Clinic for ADTKD investigation. Genetic testing methods evolved over time: Before 2015, Sanger sequencing was used. Since 2015, a stepwise genetic approach was used: (1) next-generation sequencing (NGS) for UMOD, REN, HNF1B, and SEC61A1; (2) if negative, targeted analysis for the insertion of a single cytosine in the variable-number tandem repeat (VNTR) sequence of MUC1; (3) if still negative, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) was performed to detect HNF1B deletions (P241-D2 kit, MRC-Holland). For patients with CKD and undefined phenotype, broader NGS panels for CKD were applied. Negative results underwent periodic re-evaluation, including deeper phenotyping when possible, and re-analysis using expanded gene panels, whole-exome sequencing (WES), or additional methods in reference laboratories. Pre-test genetic counseling was conducted by a nephrologist, while post-test counseling was performed jointly by a nephrologist and a geneticist, particularly for family screening and segregation studies. Results Among 35 families studied, a confirmed genetic diagnosis was obtained in 15 (43%), identifying 42 patients with ADTKD. The implicated variants were: MUC1: 5 families (18 patients); UMOD: 4 families (11 patients, all diagnosed via Sanger sequencing); HNF1B: 5 families (12 patients); REN: 1 patient with biallelic REN mutations (heterozygous). Four families presented with an undefined phenotype: two families underwent CKD panel testing due to young age at onset; two families had a cystic kidney phenotype and were tested using a cystic kidney disease panel. Notably, all these families harbored pathogenic or likely pathogenic HNF1B variants. One family underwent additional PacBio sequencing for MUC1 at a reference laboratory, leading to the identification of the dup60A variant in MUC1. Re-analysis of negative results led to the identification of pathogenic variants in two additional families: COL4A3 (heterozygous) in 1 family (2 patients); SDCCAG8 (homozygous) in 1 family (2 patients). Likely pathogenic variants were identified in: PAX2 in 1 family (3 patients); PKD1 in 1 family (3 patients); COL4A5 in 1 family (3 patients). Studies are ongoing in two families, while the remaining negative cases will undergo re-evaluation. Additionally, segregation studies are in progress for three families to assess the pathogenicity of variants in: UMOD (1 family, at least 2 patients); HNF1B (1 family, 2 patients); a family with CKD (3 patients) where the index patient carries VUS in both HNF1B and UMOD. Conclusion A genetic diagnosis of ADTKD was established in 43% of the families studied, and genetic CKD was confirmed in 57% of the families. MUC1 and UMOD were the most prevalent genes associated with ADTKD, though a significant number of cases involved HNF1B (mostly CNVs). Re-analysis of initially negative results increased the diagnostic yield for ADTKD and genetic CKD with an ADTKD-like phenotype. These findings suggest that broader gene panels as a first-line approach may enhance diagnostic accuracy. Additionally, the limitations of NGS and WES in detecting MUC1 and HNF1B variants underscore the importance of collaboration with specialized reference laboratories for ADTKD diagnosis.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article

MO032: Autosomal dominant tubulointerstitial kidney diseases (ADTKD): single center cohort

  • May 03, 2022
  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
  • Sofia Jorge +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Phenotypic Heterogeneity of ADTKD-MUC1 Diagnosed Using VNtyper, a Novel Genetic Technique.

  • May 01, 2025
  • American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation
  • Jessica Kachmar +16
  • Research Article
  • Citations9

Systematic Screening of Autosomal Dominant Tubulointerstitial Kidney Disease- MUC1 27dupC Pathogenic Variant through Exome Sequencing.

  • Sep 26, 2024
  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN
  • Ilias Bensouna +8
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Abstract P3-09-05: Clinical outcome of patients with advanced triple negative breast cancer with germline and somatic variants in homologous recombination gene

  • Feb 14, 2017
  • Cancer Research
  • N Stjepanovic +18
  • Research Article
  • Citations545

ACMG SF v3.0 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)

  • Aug 01, 2021
  • Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics
  • David T Miller +17
  • Research Article

Autosomal dominant tubulointerstitial kidney disease – from a diagnostic desert to a more nuanced landscape of roses and thorns

  • Feb 03, 2026
  • Medizinische Genetik
  • Andrea Wenzel +3
  • Research Article

#1967 Why is the genetic test for the ADTKD subtype MUC1 so complex and what alternative diagnostic procedures are available?

  • Oct 01, 2025
  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
  • Christian Scheidler +1
  • Research Article

#5124 GENETIC GLOMERULAR DISEASES IN THE ADULT PATIENT: A WORK IN PROGRESS – SINGLE CENTRE COHORT

  • Jun 14, 2023
  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
  • Telma Pais +9
  • Research Article

Genetic renal disorders and genomic screening of renal disease

  • Jan 10, 2023
  • Medicine
  • Osasuyi Iyasere +1
  • Research Article

A novel likely pathogenic POFUT1 variant in a Turkish family with Dowling-Degos disease.

  • Mar 26, 2026
  • Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG
  • Sezgi Sarikaya Solak +4
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Genetic counseling in direct-to-consumer exome sequencing: a case report.

  • Jun 24, 2014
  • Journal of genetic counseling
  • Saskia Van Den Berg +3
  • Research Article

FC 014INFLUENCE OF GENETIC VARIATION IN SLC7A13/AGT1 IN HUMAN CYSTINURIA

  • May 29, 2021
  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
  • Ria Schönauer +8
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

NGS-based targeted sequencing identified six novel variants in patients with Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy from southwestern China

  • May 30, 2023
  • BMC Medical Genomics
  • Feng Tang +5
  • Research Article

Abstract 4871: Whole-exome sequencing identifies a high frequency of germline deleterious variants in cancer predisposition genes in individuals with osteosarcoma

  • Jul 01, 2017
  • Cancer Research
  • Roelof Koster +32
  • Research Article
  • Citations67

Autosomal Dominant Tubulointerstitial Kidney Disease: Clinical Presentation of Patients With ADTKD-UMOD and ADTKD-MUC1

  • May 18, 2018
  • American Journal of Kidney Diseases
  • Nadia Ayasreh +18
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.