• Home
  • Search
  • A Bayesian response-adaptive dose-finding and comparative effectiveness trial.
  • Open Access IconOpen Access
  • Cite Icon9
  • https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774520965173Copy DOI Icon

A Bayesian response-adaptive dose-finding and comparative effectiveness trial.

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Combinations of treatments that have already received regulatory approval can offer additional benefit over Each of the treatments individually. However, trials of these combinations are lower priority than those that develop novel therapies, which can restrict funding, timelines and patient availability. This article develops a novel trial design to facilitate the evaluation of New combination therapies. This trial design combines elements of phase II and phase III trials to reduce the burden of evaluating combination therapies, while also maintaining a feasible sample size. This design was developed for a randomised trial that compares the properties of three combination doses of ketamine and dexmedetomidine, given intranasally, to ketamine delivered intravenously for children undergoing a closed reduction for a fracture or dislocation. This trial design uses response-adaptive randomisation to evaluate different dose combinations and increase the information collected for successful novel drug combinations. The design then uses Bayesian dose-response modelling to undertake a comparative effectiveness analysis for the most successful dose combination against a relevant comparator. We used simulation methods determine the thresholds for adapting the trial and making conclusions. We also used simulations to evaluate the probability of selecting the dose combination with the highest true effectiveness the operating characteristics of the design and its Bayesian predictive power. With 410 participants, five interim updates of the randomisation ratio and a probability of effectiveness of 0.93, 0.88 and 0.83 for the three dose combinations, we have an 83% chance of randomising the largest number of patients to the drug with the highest probability of effectiveness. Based on this adaptive randomisation procedure, the comparative effectiveness analysis has a type I error of less than 5% and a 93% chance of correcting concluding non-inferiority, when the probability of effectiveness for the optimal combination therapy is 0.9. In this case, the trial has a greater than 77% chance of meeting its dual aims of dose-finding and comparative effectiveness. Finally, the Bayesian predictive power of the trial is over 90%. By simultaneously determining the optimal dose and collecting data on the relative effectiveness of an intervention, we can minimise administrative burden and recruitment time for a trial. This will minimise the time required to get effective, safe combination therapies to patients quickly. The proposed trial has high potential to meet the dual study objectives within a feasible overall sample size.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations110

Combination spinal analgesic chemotherapy: a systematic review.

  • Sep 01, 2002
  • Anesthesia and analgesia
  • Suellen M Walker +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations58

Explaining the acetaminophen–ibuprofen analgesic interaction using a response surface model

  • Jul 01, 2011
  • Pediatric Anesthesia
  • Jacqueline Hannam +1
  • Research Article

Abstract 1422: Enhancing the therapeutic effects of PARP inhibitors in combination DNA methyl transferase inhibitors, using low doses of ionizing radiation in non small cell lung cancers

  • Jul 01, 2017
  • Cancer Research
  • Christopher Biondi +8
  • Research Article

COCA: a randomized Bayesian design integrating dose optimization and component contribution assessment for combination therapies.

  • Apr 02, 2025
  • Biometrics
  • Xiaohan Chi +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations25

Building efficient comparative effectiveness trials through adaptive designs, utility functions, and accrual rate optimization: finding the sweet spot.

  • Jan 07, 2015
  • Statistics in medicine
  • Byron J Gajewski +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Rebuttal to the Response of Chou

  • Mar 31, 2011
  • Cancer Research
  • J Jack Lee +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations9

Improving anti-tumor efficacy of low-dose Vincristine in rhabdomyosarcoma via the combination therapy with FOXM1 inhibitor RCM1

  • Feb 02, 2023
  • Frontiers in Oncology
  • Johnny Donovan +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of natalizumab and fingolimod in rapidly evolving severe relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the United Kingdom

  • Dec 26, 2023
  • Journal of Medical Economics
  • T Spelman +64
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

The Ci3+3 design for dual-agent combination dose-finding clinical trials

  • Nov 02, 2021
  • Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
  • Shijie Yuan +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

II型高脂血症患者に対するNiceritrol Probucol併用療法の有用性

  • Jan 01, 1991
  • The Journal of Japan Atherosclerosis Society
  • Kyosuke Yamamoto +8
  • Abstract

Mental Health Crisis and Policing Demand

  • Sep 10, 2024
  • International Journal of Population Data Science
  • Ian Sobotka +4
  • Research Article

Abstract 2667: Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Stroke Center Designations on Patient Outcomes

  • Feb 01, 2012
  • Stroke
  • James R Langabeer +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations37

Ponatinib Combined With Rapamycin Causes Regression of Murine Venous Malformation

  • Jan 10, 2019
  • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
  • Xian Li +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Abstract LB-140: Phase 1b/2 study of an intratumoral TLR9 agonist spherical nucleic acid (AST-008) and pembrolizumab: Evidence of immune activation

  • Aug 13, 2020
  • Cancer Research
  • Mohammed M Milhem +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations29

An Evaluation of Antimalarial Combinations against Plasmodium berghei in the Mouse

  • Dec 01, 1963
  • The Journal of Parasitology
  • Richard L Jacobs +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.