A Comparative Performance Analysis of Locally Deployed Large Language Models Through a Retrieval-Augmented Generation Educational Assistant Application for Textual Data Extraction

In today’s rapidly evolving business landscape, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and specifically Large Language Models (LLMs), are redefining how organizations operate, make decisions, and engage with customers. AI-driven technologies have become indispensable, providing businesses with powerful tools to streamline operations, derive actionable insights from vast data, and foster more meaningful customer interactions. For business leaders, scholars, and practitioners alike, understanding the transformative potential of AI isn’t just advantageous—it’s essential to staying competitive in an increasingly data-driven world.This editorial delves into recent scholarly advancements in LLM applications within business contexts, analyzing studies that explore AI’s potential across various domains, from decision support to creative industries. By introducing a structured framework, this editorial highlights key insights and contributions from recent studies, assessing their value to academia and industry. The following comparative analysis sheds light on how these innovations shape our understanding of AI’s role in business while pointing to future research directions.Puyt and Madsen's (2024) study stands out as a foundational exploration of LLM accuracy, assessing ChatGPT-4's ability to recount the history of the SWOT analysis-a vital business strategy tool. Their findings reveal that, while ChatGPT-4 effectively conveys general concepts, it struggles with detailed historical information, often producing inaccuracies or "hallucinations." This gap underscores the need for LLMs to be trained with verified academic data, particularly for strategic business applications that demand precision. This study not only contributes to the literature by proposing methods to evaluate AI accuracy in historical contexts but also highlights the importance of rigorous information vetting in industry settings where reliability is crucial.In contrast, Raikov et al. (2024) explore a hybrid intelligence model that combines LLM capabilities with explainable AI (XAI) principles to enhance human-machine collaboration. Their approach emphasizes cognitive semantics, improving transparency and decision-making efficiency. The hybrid model's real-time adaptability addresses the needs of complex, regulated industries such as finance and healthcare, where trust in AI decisions is paramount. Academically, this study provides a valuable addition to XAI literature by demonstrating how LLMs can bridge the gap between AI autonomy and human oversight, making it a model for future human-AI interactions in complex business environments.Another significant study by Mariotti and colleagues (2024) examines the integration of LLMs with enterprise knowledge graphs to enhance data-driven decision-making. By enabling organizations to leverage knowledge graphs for more accurate and scalable data retrieval, this research provides a robust framework for businesses seeking efficient knowledge management systems. The academic contribution here lies in advancing the dialogue between LLMs and knowledge graphs, emphasizing ethical data handling and quality standards essential for industry applications. For enterprises, the study offers practical solutions to achieve streamlined data management, balancing automation with privacy and security. 2024) take a different approach, investigating LLMs' role in creative industries, specifically within fashion design. They introduce a hybrid intelligence model that supports creative processes, allowing AI to complement rather than replace human ingenuity. While LLMs in this field demonstrate potential in automating repetitive design tasks and enhancing customer personalization, the study reveals limitations in AI's ability to handle spatial and stylistic nuances. This study's academic contribution lies in promoting human-AI co-creation, inspiring further research into AI applications across diverse creative sectors, including media and marketing.Collectively, these studies not only illuminate LLMs' transformative potential in business but also highlight critical ethical and operational considerations. Ensuring accuracy, transparency, and data privacy are vital to responsibly integrating AI into business workflows. Future research should focus on enhancing LLM accuracy, refining hybrid intelligence models, and exploring creative AI applications, all while maintaining ethical standards. As LLMs evolve, interdisciplinary collaborations will be essential to harness their full potential, making AI an ethical, effective, and innovative force in the business world.

The high performance of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLM) in examination contexts has triggered an intense debate about their applications, effects and risks. What legal aspects need to be considered when using LLM in teaching and assessment? What possibilities do language models offer? Statutes and laws are used to assess the use of LLM: - University statutes, state higher education laws, licensing regulations for doctors - Copyright Act (UrhG) - General Data Protection Regulation (DGPR) - AI Regulation (EU AI Act) LLM and AI offer opportunities but require clear university frameworks. These should define legitimate uses and areas where use is prohibited. Cheating and plagiarism violate good scientific practice and copyright laws. Cheating is difficult to detect. Plagiarism by AI is possible. Users of the products are responsible. LLM are effective tools for generating exam questions. Nevertheless, careful review is necessary as even apparently high-quality products may contain errors. However, the risk of copyright infringement with AI-generated exam questions is low, as copyright law allows up to 15% of protected works to be used for teaching and exams. The grading of exam content is subject to higher education laws and regulations and the GDPR. Exclusively computer-based assessment without human review is not permitted. For high-risk applications in education, the EU's AI Regulation will apply in the future. When dealing with LLM in assessments, evaluation criteria for existing assessments can be adapted, as can assessment programmes, e.g. to reduce the motivation to cheat. LLM can also become the subject of the examination themselves. Teachers should undergo further training in AI and consider LLM as an addition.

ObjectiveThrough this scoping review, we aim to explore and synthesize existing knowledge and evidence on the learning approaches for incorporating LLMs into healthcare education and public health research and learning spaces. Specifically, we will attempt to investigate methods for auditing prompts for accuracy, fairness, and effectiveness; tailoring prompts to improve task-specific accuracy and utility; and exploring how end-user feedback is used to refine and optimize LLM prompts over time. This review will provide a comprehensive understanding of how LLMs are being tailored and improved in these fields, contributing to the development of evidence-based strategies for their implementation. It will also identify areas for future research and innovation.IntroductionThe increasing integration of large language models (LLMs) into healthcare education and public health research and learning spaces, highlights their potential to revolutionize service delivery, decision-making, and ultimately patient care and outcomes. Despite these advancements, understanding how LLMs can be effectively tailored, audited, and refined for learning remains a critical area of inquiry. Key issues include, the accuracy of generated information, and their relevance to the medical and public health fields.Inclusion criteriaOur focus will be on studies addressing LLM applications in healthcare education and public health research and learning spaces, prompt engineering techniques, prompt auditing methods, and processes geared towards integrating user feedback. Articles that do not focus on healthcare or public health contexts and lack relevance to LLM learning approaches will be excluded.MethodsThe review is guided by the JBI methodology for scoping reviews complemented by updates from Levac et al. Databases including PubMed, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science will be searched for peer-reviewed articles, conference proceedings, and grey literature published in English and French from 2015 to 2025. Data extraction will include information on study characteristics, LLM models, prompt engineering strategies, auditing methodologies, and user feedback mechanisms. We will synthesize to identify trends, gaps, and best practices in leveraging LLMs to generate baseline data for auditing prompts that optimize AI learning and education needs in the healthcare and public health sector.

Generative large language models (LLMs) are a subset of transformers-based neural network architecture models. LLMs have successfully leveraged a combination of an increased number of parameters, improvements in computational efficiency, and large pre-training datasets to perform a wide spectrum of natural language processing (NLP) tasks. Using a few examples (few-shot) or no examples (zero-shot) for prompt-tuning has enabled LLMs to achieve state-of-the-art performance in a broad range of NLP applications. This article by the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) NLP Working Group characterizes the opportunities, challenges, and best practices for our community to leverage and advance the integration of LLMs in downstream NLP applications effectively. This can be accomplished through a variety of approaches, including augmented prompting, instruction prompt tuning, and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). Our focus is on making LLMs accessible to the broader biomedical informatics community, including clinicians and researchers who may be unfamiliar with NLP. Additionally, NLP practitioners may gain insight from the described best practices. We focus on 3 broad categories of NLP tasks, namely natural language understanding, natural language inferencing, and natural language generation. We review the emerging trends in prompt tuning, instruction fine-tuning, and evaluation metrics used for LLMs while drawing attention to several issues that impact biomedical NLP applications, including falsehoods in generated text (confabulation/hallucinations), toxicity, and dataset contamination leading to overfitting. We also review potential approaches to address some of these current challenges in LLMs, such as chain of thought prompting, and the phenomena of emergent capabilities observed in LLMs that can be leveraged to address complex NLP challenge in biomedical applications.

Large language models (LLMs) are advanced artificial intelligence (AI) tools capable of generating human-like text and are increasingly used in education, clinical care, and research. Little is known about their use within oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) training. This study investigates LLM usage trends, perceived value, and educational integration among OMFS residents in the United States. A national, anonymous cross-sectional survey was distributed to OMFS residents via program directors. It gathered demographic data, LLM usage patterns, applications, perceived limitations, and attitudes toward incorporating LLMs into formal education. Eighty-one residents responded, 79.0% (64/81) reported having used an LLM, and of that group, 96.9% (62/64) use ChatGPT. 51.9% (42/81) of respondents used LLMs at least monthly in residency; however, 97.5% (79/81) reported having received no formal LLM education during residency. Residents used LLMs for clinical decision support, board preparation, research, and career planning. Free-text responses revealed a wide spectrum of views. Some advocated for curricular integration and patient education applications, while others questioned the need for formal instruction. Some respondents supported integrating LLMs into curriculums and patient education while others questioned the need for formal instruction. LLMs are used frequently by OMFS residents for a variety of purposes. As AI and LLMs become embedded in healthcare, understanding how OMFS residents interact with LLMs is vital. These findings may guide curriculum development, fostering responsible and effective use of LLMs in surgical training and practice.

Abstract. Problem. The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has significantly impacted various domains, particularly education. AI-driven tools are increasingly being integrated into teaching methodologies, assessment frameworks, and curriculum design. However, despite the growing research interest in Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED), the field remains fragmented, lacking a comprehensive analysis of dominant research themes and emerging trends. Understanding these trends is crucial for optimizing AI applications in education and shaping future developments in the field. Goal. The primary goal of this study is to analyze the current landscape of AIED research by identifying key thematic clusters, evaluating dominant research directions, and predicting future trajectories in AI-driven education. Methodology. This study employs network analysis, topic modeling, and global research trend evaluation to analyze scientific publications in AIED. The Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) algorithm is applied to classify research articles into thematic categories, enabling the identification of primary topics shaping the field. Data is sourced from the Web of Science database, and hierarchical clustering techniques are used to determine semantic similarities between thematic models. Results. The analysis reveals five major research clusters in AIED, including AI applications in medical education, machine learning in education, adaptive learning technologies, large language models in learning, and student-centered AI-driven educational strategies. The study identifies increasing trends in the adoption of generative AI and chatbot-based learning support, while traditional AI-driven assessment methodologies show moderate growth. The results also highlight strong interconnections between AI-driven personalization and intelligent tutoring systems, emphasizing the shift toward adaptive and student-centric learning environments. Originality. This research provides a structured and systematic analysis of AIED trends, leveraging advanced topic modeling techniques. Unlike previous studies focusing on isolated AI applications in education, this study presents a holistic view of thematic structures in AIED research, offering a quantitative and data-driven approach to understanding the evolution of the field. Practical Value. The findings can serve as a strategic reference for educators, policymakers, and AI developers in shaping future educational technologies. By identifying key thematic directions, this research supports evidence-based decision-making for integrating AI into educational systems. The results can also guide further research in AIED, helping scholars explore emerging AI-driven teaching methodologies, adaptive learning models, and ethical considerations in AI-powered education.

PurposeLarge language models (LLMs) like Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 (GPT-4) can assist in detecting errors in radiology reports, but privacy concerns limit their clinical applicability. This study compares closed-source and privacy-compliant open-source LLMs for detecting common errors in radiology reports.Materials and methodsA total of 120 radiology reports were compiled (30 each from X-ray, ultrasound, CT, and MRI). Subsequently, 397 errors from five categories (typographical, numerical, findings-impression discrepancies, omission/insertion, interpretation) were inserted into 100 of these reports; 20 reports were left unchanged. Two open-source models (Llama 3-70b, Mixtral 8x22b) and two commercial closed-source (GPT-4, GPT-4o) were tasked with error detection using identical prompts. The Kruskall–Wallis test and paired t-test were used for statistical analysis.ResultsOpen-source LLMs required less processing time per radiology report than closed-source LLMs (6 ± 2 s vs. 13 ± 4 s; p < 0.001). Closed-source LLMs achieved higher error detection rates than open-source LLMs (GPT-4o: 88% [348/397; 95% CI: 86, 92], GPT-4: 83% [328/397; 95% CI: 80, 87], Llama 3-70b: 79% [311/397; 95% CI: 76, 83], Mixtral 8x22b: 73% [288/397; 95% CI: 68, 77]; p < 0.001). Numerical errors (88% [67/76; 95% CI: 82, 93]) were detected significantly more often than typographical errors (75% [65/86; 95% CI: 68, 82]; p = 0.02), discrepancies between findings and impression (73% [73/101; 95% CI: 67, 80]; p < 0.01), and interpretation errors (70% [50/71; 95% CI: 62, 78]; p = 0.001).ConclusionOpen-source LLMs demonstrated effective error detection, albeit with comparatively lower accuracy than commercial closed-source models, and have potential for clinical applications when deployed via privacy-compliant local hosting solutions.Key PointsQuestionCan privacy-compliant open-source large language models (LLMs) match the error-detection performance of commercial non-privacy-compliant closed-source models in radiology reports?FindingsClosed-source LLMs achieved slightly higher accuracy in detecting radiology report errors than open-source models, with Llama 3-70b yielding the best results among the open-source models.Clinical relevanceOpen-source LLMs offer a privacy-compliant alternative for automated error detection in radiology reports, improving clinical workflow efficiency while ensuring patient data confidentiality. Further refinement could enhance their accuracy, contributing to better diagnosis and patient care.Graphical

Identifying drilling risks for upcoming wells demands insights from offset wells. While some risks may lead to non-productive time (NPT), others remain latent within daily drilling reports (DDRs), which is crucial for comprehensive analysis. Manual extraction from DDRs is often time-consuming. In this paper, we systematically explore the methods to leverage the Large Language Models (LLMs) with enhanced workflows to automate insights extraction and improve risk identification accuracy. We compared LLMs customization approaches and state-of-the-art NLP models to validate LLMs efficiency in the drilling domain. We show that the adaptation of prompt optimization, Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) with the pre-trained LLMs before fine-tuning the model, already shows a significant improvement, achieving an accuracy ranging from 80-85%, with precision and recall surging from less than 50%, as observed from our benchmark oil and gas finetuned GPT-2 model (Marlot et al., 2023), to over 70% with our customized model. We addressed the challenge of imbalance training examples during the finetuning of the state-of-the-art GPT-2 model, which caused the underperformance of the benchmark model, particularly in addressing rare drilling event classes. This paper demonstrates LLMs able to improve the generalization and reliability of the imbalance drilling risks, with proper workflow enhancements. Subsequently, we also finetuned both on-premises LLMs (Llama2, Llama3, Mistral), and cloud LLM GPT-3.5 Turbo, which exhibits promising outcomes, achieving better performance to over 90% accuracy, and over 80% precision and recall, compared to the earlier approach using prompt and RAG. This paper contributes to advancing the application of LLMs in the oil and gas industry, for domain-specific tasks, addressing the common challenge of imbalance operation training data, and demonstrating our enhanced workflow outperforms both the benchmark finetuned GPT-2 model, pretrained GPT-4 model, and the finetuned GPT-3.5 Turbo.

The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has intensified the need for effective mechanisms to transform continuous multimodal data into discrete representations suitable for language-based processing. Discrete tokenization, with vector quantization (VQ) as a central approach, offers both computational efficiency and compatibility with LLM architectures. Despite its growing importance, there is a lack of a comprehensive survey that systematically examines VQ techniques in the context of LLM-based systems. This work fills this gap by presenting the first structured taxonomy and analysis of discrete tokenization methods designed for LLMs. We categorize 8 representative VQ variants that span classical and modern paradigms and analyze their algorithmic principles, training dynamics, and integration challenges with LLM pipelines. Beyond algorithm-level investigation, we discuss existing research in terms of classical applications without LLMs, LLM-based single-modality systems, and LLM-based multimodal systems, highlighting how quantization strategies influence alignment, reasoning, and generation performance. In addition, we identify key challenges including codebook collapse, unstable gradient estimation, and modality-specific encoding constraints. Finally, we discuss emerging research directions such as dynamic and task-adaptive quantization, unified tokenization frameworks, and biologically inspired codebook learning. This survey bridges the gap between traditional vector quantization and modern LLM applications, serving as a foundational reference for the development of efficient and generalizable multimodal systems. A continuously updated version is available at: https://github.com/jindongli-Ai/LLM-Discrete-Tokenization-Survey.

With their unmatched ability to interpret and engage with human language and context, large language models (LLMs) hint at the potential to bridge AI and human cognitive processes. This review explores the current application of LLMs, such as ChatGPT, in the field of psychiatry. We followed PRISMA guidelines and searched through PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus, up until March 2024. From 771 retrieved articles, we included 16 that directly examine LLMs' use in psychiatry. LLMs, particularly ChatGPT and GPT-4, showed diverse applications in clinical reasoning, social media, and education within psychiatry. They can assist in diagnosing mental health issues, managing depression, evaluating suicide risk, and supporting education in the field. However, our review also points out their limitations, such as difficulties with complex cases and potential underestimation of suicide risks. Early research in psychiatry reveals LLMs' versatile applications, from diagnostic support to educational roles. Given the rapid pace of advancement, future investigations are poised to explore the extent to which these models might redefine traditional roles in mental health care.

Large Language Models (LLMs) commonly report high confidence, even in domains where their underlying knowledge or training data is limited. This mismatch can negatively impact model reliability, particularly affecting educational applications where users may not recognize errors. To detect these knowledge gaps, LLM knowledge must be assessed after training. In this work, we compare LLM prompts to self-assess knowledge of content in two ways: rank-ordering and direct confidence scoring (e.g., 1-5). For human metacognition, rankings or A/B comparisons are more reliable, so we hypothesize that LLMs’ rankings may also be more effective than scores. We compare LLM-generated Overall Rankings and confidence scores for 15 topics against two external estimates of LLM knowledge: expert human ratings and search result counts from Bing, Google, and Wikipedia. We also consider Anchored Rankings in which each document to be rated by the LLM is compared to a set of documents with known expert scores. Comparing across different document representations and different LLMs, Spearman correlations with expert ratings are generally: positive and relatively high with Anchored Rankings having the highest correlation (ρ ranging from 0.74 to 1.0) followed by Overall Rankings and then confidence scores. In contrast, search-based signals have a weaker and variable alignment suggesting that web popularity is a noisy signal for estimating LLM familiarity with content. Overall, these findings suggest that relative self-assessment through rankings provides an interpretable signal of LLM self-knowledge. This can be used to select specialized prompts or workflows for topics where an LLM has less knowledge.

Knowledge tags on math questions are essential for education as they provide great convenience to both teachers and students in finding desired practicing material during the learning process. Traditionally, pedagogical experts have been responsible for these annotations, as the task requires a profound understanding of how to link problem-solving logic with relevant knowledge concepts. However, with the advancement of sophisticated text encoding algorithms, such as pre-trained language models (PLMs), researchers have developed automated knowledge-tagging systems that leverage deep semantic embeddings. This work explores the automation of this task using Large Language Models (LLMs), addressing the limitations of earlier encoding-based methods—particularly in complex cases that require extensive domain expertise and nuanced concept definitions. By harnessing LLMs' advanced reasoning and tool-using capabilities, we overcome the challenges posed by previous approaches, achieving human-level performance with large-scale LLMs. Our findings underscore the significant potential of LLMs in educational applications.

BackgroundThe readability of online bariatric surgery patient education materials (PEMs) often surpasses the recommended 6th grade level. Large language models (LLMs), like ChatGPT and Bard, have the potential to revolutionize PEM delivery. We aimed to evaluate the readability of PEMs produced by U.S. medical institutions compared to LLMs, as well as the ability of LLMs to simplify their responses.MethodsResponses to frequently asked questions (FAQs) related to bariatric surgery were gathered from top-ranked health institutions. FAQ responses were also generated from GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Bard. LLMs were then prompted to improve the readability of their initial responses. The readability of institutional responses, initial LLM responses, and simplified LLM responses were graded using validated readability formulas. Accuracy and comprehensiveness of initial and simplified LLM responses were also compared.ResultsResponses to 66 FAQs were included. All institutional and initial LLM responses had poor readability, with average reading levels ranging from 9th grade to college graduate. Simplified responses from LLMs had significantly improved readability, with reading levels ranging from 6th grade to college freshman. When comparing simplified LLM responses, GPT-4 responses demonstrated the highest readability, with reading levels ranging from 6th to 9th grade. Accuracy was similar between initial and simplified responses from all LLMs. Comprehensiveness was similar between initial and simplified responses from GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. However, 34.8% of Bard's simplified responses were graded as less comprehensive compared to initial.ConclusionOur study highlights the efficacy of LLMs in enhancing the readability of bariatric surgery PEMs. GPT-4 outperformed other models, generating simplified PEMs from 6th to 9th grade reading levels. Unlike GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, Bard’s simplified responses were graded as less comprehensive. We advocate for future studies examining the potential role of LLMs as dynamic and personalized sources of PEMs for diverse patient populations of all literacy levels.

Forgetting is the complementary process to memory, enabling both biological and artificial systems to prioritize relevant information while discarding outdated or redundant data. In large language models (LLMs), forgetting occurs through computational mechanisms such as attention bottlenecks, catastrophic interference, and optimization dynamics, mirroring neurobiological processes such as synaptic decay and memory consolidation. While existing research has extensively studied memory mechanisms in LLMs, there remains a critical gap in systematically analyzing forgetting phenomena and their implications for AI system design. This study presents a comprehensive review of forgetting mechanisms in LLMs through a neuroscience-inspired lens. This study first establishes parallels between human forgetting processes and computational forgetting patterns in LLMs. Building on these foundations, this study proposes a novel taxonomy that classifies LLM forgetting across four key dimensions. This taxonomy is further supported by the introduction of quantitative evaluation metrics to provide additional evidence. Furthermore, this study demonstrates how controlled forgetting can be transformed from a limitation into a design feature through bio-inspired optimization strategies. These approaches enable critical applications in privacy-compliant AI, adaptive education systems, and sustainable computing. The study concludes by identifying open challenges in generalization, ethical governance of machine forgetting, and computational efficiency, while outlining future directions for developing LLMs with human-like memory adaptability.

As the Large Language Model (LLM) becomes increasingly important in various domains, the performance of LLM inference is crucial to massive LLM applications. However, centering around the computational efficiency and the memory utilization, the following challenges remain unsolved in achieving high-throughput LLM inference: (1) Synchronous partial softmax update. The softmax operation requires a synchronous update operation among each partial softmax result, leading to ~20% overheads for the attention computation in LLMs. (2) Under-utilized computation of flat GEMM. The shape of matrices performing GEMM in LLM inference tends to be flat, leading to under-utilized computation and 50% performance loss after padding zeros in previous designs (e.g., cuBLAS, CUTLASS, etc.). (3) Memory redundancy caused by activations. Dynamic allocation of activations during inference leads to redundant storage of useless variables, bringing 22% more memory consumption. <p xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">We present <i>FlashDecoding</i>++<i>Next</i>, a high-throughput inference engine supporting mainstream LLMs and hardware backends. To tackle the above challenges, <i>FlashDecoding</i>++<i>Next</i> creatively proposes: (1) Asynchronous softmax with unified maximum. <i>FlashDecoding</i>++<i>Next</i> introduces a unified maximum technique for different partial softmax computations to avoid synchronization. Based on this, a fine-grained pipelining is proposed, leading to 1.18× and 1.14× for the <i>prefill</i> and <i>decode</i> phases in LLM inference, respectively. (2) Flat GEMM optimization with double buffering. <i>FlashDecoding</i>++<i>Next</i> points out that flat GEMMs with different shapes face varied bottlenecks. Then, techniques like double buffering are introduced, resulting in up to 52% speedup for the flat GEMM operation. (3) Buffer reusing and unified memory management. <i>FlashDecoding</i>++<i>Next</i> reuses the pre-allocated activation buffers throughout the inference process to remove redundancy. Based on that, we unify the management of different types of storage to further exploit the reusing opportunity. The memory optimization enables up to 1.57× longer sequence to be processed. <i>FlashDecoding</i>++<i>Next</i> demonstrates remarkable throughput improvement, delivering up to 68.88× higher throughput compared to the HuggingFace [1] implementation. On average, <i>FlashDecoding</i>++<i>Next</i> achieves 1.25× and 1.46× higher throughput compared to vLLM [2] and TensorRT-LLM [3] on mainstream LLMs.