• Home
  • Search
  • A Comparative Study of Sentiment Analysis Methods for Detecting Fake Reviews in E-Commerce
  • Cite Icon8
  • https://doi.org/10.28991/hij-2023-04-02-08Copy DOI Icon

A Comparative Study of Sentiment Analysis Methods for Detecting Fake Reviews in E-Commerce

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Highlights & Summary
  • PDF
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

The popularity of the e-commerce system has increased, especially under the COVID scenario. Consumer product reviews from the past have had a significant impact on influencing consumers' purchasing decisions. Fake reviews—those written by humans and computers that engage in dishonest behavior—are consequently generated to increase product sales. The fake reviews hurt consumers and are dishonest. The goal of this research is to examine and evaluate the performance of various methods for identifying fake reviews. The well-known and widely-used Amazon Review Data (2018) dataset was used for this research. The first 10 product categories on Amazon.com with favorable feedback will be provided in the data section. After that, perform fundamental data preparation procedures such as special character trimming, bag of words, TF-IDF, etc. The models are trained to create a dataset for detecting fake reviews. This research compares the performance of four different models: GPT-2, NBSVM, BiLSTM, and RoBERTa. The hyperparameters of the models are also tuned to find the optimal values. The research concludes that the RoBERTa model performs the best overall, with an accuracy of 97%. GPT-2 has an overall accuracy of 82%, NBSVM has an overall accuracy of 95%, and BiLSTM has an overall accuracy of 92%. The research also calculates the Area Under the Curve (AUC) for each model and finds that RoBERTa has an AUC of 0.9976, NBSVM has an AUC of 0.9888, BiLSTM has an AUC of 0.9753, and GPT-2 has an AUC of 0.9226. It can be observed that the RoBERTa model has the highest AUC value, which is close to 1. Therefore, it can be concluded that this model provides the most accurate prediction for detecting fake reviews, which is the main focus of this research. Doi: 10.28991/HIJ-2023-04-02-08 Full Text: PDF

Loading PDF

Similar Papers
  • Research Article

Pitfalls When Using Area Under the Curve to Evaluate Item Content for Early Screening Tests for Autism

  • Jan 31, 2022
  • Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
  • Carmen A Lucas +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Preoperative frailty assessment with ultrasound in elderly patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty.

  • Feb 01, 2024
  • Minerva Anestesiologica
  • Hansol Kim +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations29

Prediction of myopia onset with refractive error measured using non-cycloplegic subjective refraction: the WEPrOM Study

  • Jun 01, 2021
  • BMJ Open Ophthalmology
  • Yee Ling Wong +9
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations15

Comparison of the different voxel sizes in the estimation of peri-implant fenestration defects using cone beam computed tomography: an ex vivo study

  • Oct 02, 2020
  • International Journal of Implant Dentistry
  • Mehmet Hakan Kurt +4
  • Research Article

Revealing pathway cross-talk related to diabetes mellitus by Monte Carlo Cross-Validation analysis

  • Dec 29, 2017
  • Open Life Sciences
  • Han-Qing Cai +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations70

Impacts of consumer cognitive process to ascertain online fake review: A cognitive dissonance theory approach

  • Oct 17, 2022
  • Journal of Business Research
  • Sheshadri Chatterjee +4
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations53

Early and delayed assessments of quantitative gait measures to improve the tap test as a predictor of shunt effectiveness in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

  • Nov 22, 2016
  • Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
  • Masatsune Ishikawa +2
  • Research Article

The Dance Functional Outcome Survey: Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation in Italian (DFOS-IT).

  • Sep 01, 2021
  • Medical problems of performing artists
  • Angela Contri +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations128

Building Risk Prediction Models for Type 2 Diabetes Using Machine Learning Techniques

  • Sep 19, 2019
  • Preventing Chronic Disease
  • Zidian Xie +3
  • Abstract
  • Citations1

Evaluation of Lung Toxicity Risk with Computed Tomography Ventilation Functional Image for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy

  • Sep 23, 2017
  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • M Otsuka +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

Use of A Systemic Inflammatory Response Index to Predict Non-Traumatic Non-Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patient Outcomes

  • Oct 29, 2022
  • Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
  • Tingting Yu +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations16

Which hemogram-derived indices might be useful in predicting the clinical outcomes of sepsis patients in the intensive care unit?

  • Jun 30, 2021
  • Cukurova Medical Journal
  • Esra Çakir +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

β-synuclein in cerebrospinal fluid as a potential biomarker for distinguishing human prion diseases from Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease

  • Feb 07, 2025
  • Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
  • Bing Xu +11
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Integrative single-cell and bulk transcriptomic analyses identify a robust four-gene signature for risk stratification in neuroblastoma

  • Jul 04, 2025
  • Translational Cancer Research
  • Zhanbo Wu +6
  • Research Article

Characteristics, Risk Stratification, and Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients Receiving Antithrombotic Therapy.

  • Apr 20, 2026
  • Biomedicines
  • Ragaey Ahmad Eid +7
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.