• Home
  • Search
  • A comparison of two methods for solving 3-D unsteady compressible viscous flows
  • Cite Icon7
  • https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1993-537Copy DOI Icon

A comparison of two methods for solving 3-D unsteady compressible viscous flows

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Numerical solutions of 3D unsteady compressible flows for several steady and unsteady cases are obtained using two procedures - a noniterative Alternating Direction Implicit (ADI) scheme and a Generalized Minimal RESidual (GMRES) method. Results obtained are compared with each other and also with experimental data. It is found that the GMRES procedure can provide significant speedups compared to the noniterative ADI procedure.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Comparison of two methods for solving three-dimensional unsteady compressible viscous flows

  • Oct 01, 1994
  • AIAA Journal
  • Ray Hixon +2
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations1

Numerical Simulation of Unsteady Compressible Viscous Flow around NACA 0012 Airfoil

  • Jan 01, 1994
  • C Tenaud +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations17

Development and application of a CFD solver to the simulation of centrifugal compressors

  • Jan 12, 1998
  • 36th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
  • Saeid Niazi +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations30

On high-resolution schemes for solving unsteady compressible two-phase dilute viscous flows

  • Oct 20, 1999
  • International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids
  • N Thevand +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations30

Pressure-based computational method for compressible and incompressible flows

  • Apr 01, 1994
  • Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer
  • S M H Karimian +1
  • Research Article

A Note on the Effect of the Choice of Weak Form on GMRES Convergence for Incompressible Nonlinear Elasticity Problems

  • Feb 01, 2010
  • Journal of Applied Mechanics
  • Pras Pathmanathan +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Discontinuity-capturing finite element computation of unsteady flow with adaptive unstructured mesh

  • Aug 01, 2004
  • Acta Mechanica Sinica
  • Dong Genjin +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Development of efficient Krylov preconditioning techniques for multi-dimensional method of characteristics

  • Apr 01, 2012
  • Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology
  • Satoshi Takeda +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article

Numerical study of mixed precision GMRES(m) preconditioned by deflation

  • May 24, 2025
  • Numerical Algorithms
  • Antony Spyropoulos +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations53

Improving the Performance of CA-GMRES on Multicores with Multiple GPUs

  • May 01, 2014
  • Ichitaro Yamazaki +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Implementation of weighted essentially non‐oscillatory scheme for unsteady and steady compressible flow in pressure‐based algorithm

  • Mar 23, 2021
  • International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids
  • Mojtaba Balaj +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations36

Numerical simulation of 3D fluid–structure interaction flow using an immersed object method with overlapping grids

  • Mar 23, 2007
  • Computers & Structures
  • C.H Tai +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations115

GMRES and the minimal polynomial

  • Dec 01, 1996
  • BIT Numerical Mathematics
  • S L Campbell +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Iterative solution methods for high-order/hp–DGFEM approximation of the linear Boltzmann transport equation

  • May 02, 2024
  • Computers & Mathematics with Applications
  • Paul Houston +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Convergence behaviour of deflated GMRES(m) algorithms on AP3000

  • Dec 25, 2000
  • ANZIAM Journal
  • Kentaro Moriya +1
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.