• Home
  • Search
  • A Feature Selection Based on Improved Artificial Hummingbird Algorithm Using Random Opposition-Based Learning for Solving Waste Classification Problem
  • Cite Icon41
  • https://doi.org/10.3390/math10152675Copy DOI Icon

A Feature Selection Based on Improved Artificial Hummingbird Algorithm Using Random Opposition-Based Learning for Solving Waste Classification Problem

Show More
  • Abstract
  • PDF
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Recycling tasks are the most effective method for reducing waste generation, protecting the environment, and boosting the overall national economy. The productivity and effectiveness of the recycling process are strongly dependent on the cleanliness and precision of processed primary sources. However, recycling operations are often labor intensive, and computer vision and deep learning (DL) techniques aid in automatically detecting and classifying trash types during recycling chores. Due to the dimensional challenge posed by pre-trained CNN networks, the scientific community has developed numerous techniques inspired by biology, swarm intelligence theory, physics, and mathematical rules. This research applies a new meta-heuristic algorithm called the artificial hummingbird algorithm (AHA) to solving the waste classification problem based on feature selection. However, the performance of the AHA is barely satisfactory; it may be stuck in optimal local regions or have a slow convergence. To overcome these limitations, this paper develops two improved versions of the AHA called the AHA-ROBL and the AHA-OBL. These two versions enhance the exploitation stage by using random opposition-based learning (ROBL) and opposition-based learning (OBL) to prevent local optima and accelerate the convergence. The main purpose of this paper is to apply the AHA-ROBL and AHA-OBL to select the relevant deep features provided by two pre-trained models of CNN (VGG19 & ResNet20) to recognize a waste classification. The TrashNet dataset is used to verify the performance of the two proposed approaches (the AHA-ROBL and AHA-OBL). The effectiveness of the suggested methods (the AHA-ROBL and AHA-OBL) is compared with that of 12 modern and competitive optimizers, namely the artificial hummingbird algorithm (AHA), Harris hawks optimizer (HHO), Salp swarm algorithm (SSA), aquila optimizer (AO), Henry gas solubility optimizer (HGSO), particle swarm optimizer (PSO), grey wolf optimizer (GWO), Archimedes optimization algorithm (AOA), manta ray foraging optimizer (MRFO), sine cosine algorithm (SCA), marine predators algorithm (MPA), and rescue optimization algorithm (SAR). A fair evaluation of the proposed algorithms’ performance is achieved using the same dataset. The performance analysis of the two proposed algorithms is applied in terms of different measures. The experimental results confirm the two proposed algorithms’ superiority over other comparative algorithms. The AHA-ROBL and AHA-OBL produce the optimal number of selected features with the highest degree of precision.

Loading PDF

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations12

Boosting Archimedes optimization algorithm using trigonometric operators based on feature selection for facial analysis

  • Oct 15, 2022
  • Neural Computing & Applications
  • Imène Neggaz +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations191

An efficient hybrid sine-cosine Harris hawks optimization for low and high-dimensional feature selection

  • Mar 04, 2021
  • Expert Systems with Applications
  • Kashif Hussain +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

Sine cosine adopted Harris' hawks optimization for function optimization and power system frequency controller design

  • Apr 26, 2021
  • International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems
  • Debidasi Mohanty +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations21

Feature Selection Based on Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization with Leadership Learning

  • Aug 28, 2022
  • Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
  • Zhiwei Ye +5
  • Conference Article
  • Citations6

Optimal Node Placement and Congestion Reduction in an Industrial Wireless Mesh Network using HHO Algorithm

  • Dec 01, 2022
  • Hakim Abdulrab +5
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations5

Frequency Stability of Two-Area Interconnected Power System with Doubly Fed Induction Generator Based Wind Turbine

  • Sep 22, 2020
  • Ahmed Hamdy +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations317

Boosted binary Harris hawks optimizer and feature selection

  • May 13, 2020
  • Engineering with Computers
  • Yanan Zhang +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations62

Sand Cat Swarm Optimization Based on Stochastic Variation With Elite Collaboration

  • Jan 01, 2022
  • IEEE Access
  • Yiming Li +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations44

Rationalized Sine Cosine Optimization With Efficient Searching Patterns

  • Jan 01, 2020
  • IEEE Access
  • Hui Huang +7
  • Research Article

Joint Placement Optimization and Sum Rate Maximization of RIS-Assisted UAV with LEO-Terrestrial Dual Wireless Backhaul

  • Aug 18, 2025
  • Telecom
  • Naba Raj Khatiwoda +2
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations6

Recent Advances of Nature-Inspired Metaheuristic Optimization

  • Jan 01, 2020
  • Ahmed Mohamed Helmi +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations51

Optimal placement ofFACTSdevices and power‐flow solutions for a power network system integrated with stochastic renewable energy resources using new metaheuristic optimization techniques

  • Jul 04, 2021
  • International Journal of Energy Research
  • Khaled Nusair +3
  • Research Article

MPA + SVM: An Active Feature Selection Approach in High-Dimensional Data Sets

  • Dec 01, 2025
  • Automatic Control and Computer Sciences
  • Wamidh Jalil Mazher +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

Modified swarm intelligence algorithms for the pharmacy duty scheduling problem

  • Apr 20, 2022
  • Expert Systems with Applications
  • Fatih Kılıç +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations17

A Robust Salp Swarm Algorithm for Photovoltaic Maximum Power Point Tracking Under Partial Shading Conditions

  • Dec 17, 2024
  • Mathematics
  • Boyan Huang +6
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.