A First Mathematical Runtime Analysis of the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II)

Mathematical runtime analysis for the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II)

This study compared the performances of three state-of-theart evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms: the Non-Dominated Sorted Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), the Epsilon-Dominance Non-Dominated Sorted Genetic Algorithm II (e -NSGA-II) and the Epsilon-Dominance Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm ( e MOEA), on a constrained biobjective crop-mix planning problem (BCP). The BCP test case objectives were to: (i) maximize crop production and (ii) minimize planting area. The BCP problem was enumerated to provide the true Pareto-optimal solution set to facilitate rigorous testing of the evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms. The performances of the three algorithms were assessed and compared using three performance metrics (additive epsilon indicator, inverted generational distance and spacing). For the comparative study, a graphical comparison with respect to true Pareto front of optimal crop planning problem was provided. Results of the analyses indicated that the e MOEA greatly outperforms the NSGAII and the e -NSGA-II.

Distribution system (DS) service restoration is a very complex multi-objective and multi-constraint optimization problem, which requires high-quality Pareto fronts for helping the DS operators' work. This paper proposes a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) that combines the advantages of MOEAs in Tables with the properties of the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II) to recover Pareto fronts of the service problem. Its main differentials are its ability of recovering high-quality Pareto fronts, even in large-scale DSs, and of prioritizing switching operations in Remotely Controlled Switches (RCSs), independently of amount of RCSs. In opposite of Manually Controlled Switches (MCSs), RCS can be faster and cheapest operated from operating center. Several tests were carried out to validate and to compare the proposed MOEA to three MOEAs published in literature. Four metrics were used for assessing the quality of Pareto fronts generated and a Welch's t hypothesis test enabled the comparison of MOEAs' performance. Test results indicate the proposed MOEA outperforms those three MOEAs published in literature.

Multi-objective optimization of the shell in autonomous intelligent argo profiling float

A number of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) have been developed and applied to water resource optimization problems over the past decade. The comparative performance of these MOEAs has been investigated often according to their overall end-of-run results (quality of optimal fronts) within prespecified computational budgets. Despite the importance of such comparative analyses, these studies have provided little knowledge of how different MOEAs navigate through the decision space toward the Pareto front. To address this issue, this paper uses a range of metrics to quantitively characterize MOEAs’ run-time searching behavior, with a focus on the statistics of search quality and convergence progress. The metrics are applied to three state-of-the-art MOEAs, including the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II), self-adaptive multiobjective differential evolution (SAMODE), and Borg, for six water distribution system (WDS) design problems with the objectives of minimizing netwo...

Determining the contribution of an agent to a system-level objective function (credit assignment) is a key area of research in cooperative multiagent systems. Multi-objective optimization is a growing area of research, though mostly focused on single agent settings. Many real-world problems are multiagent and multi-objective, (e.g., air traffic management, scheduling observations across multiple exploration robots) yet there is little work on their intersection. In this work, we leverage recent advances in single-objective multiagent learning to address multi-objective domains. We focus on the impact of difference evaluation functions (which extracts an agent's contribution to the team objective) on the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II), a state-of-the-art multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. We derive multiple methods for incorporating difference evaluations into the NSGA-II framework, and test each in a multiagent rover exploration domain, which is a good surrogate for a wide variety of distributed scheduling and resource gathering problems. We show that how and where difference evaluations are incorporated in the NSGA-II algorithm is critical, and can either provide significant benefits or destroy system performance, depending on how it is used. Median performance of the correctly used difference evaluations dominates best-case performance of NSGA-II in a multiagent multi-objective problem.

Using Pareto-based multi-objective Evolution algorithms in decision structure to transfer the hazardous materials to safety storage centre

For a high-speed and high-acceleration planar parallel mechanism, a design for control (DFC) approach is proposed for the optimization of the mechanism structure. Several evaluation indexes of kinematics and dynamics performance are established for the object functions and constraints, and then a standard multi-objective optimization problem can be formed. The dimension synthesis is carried out by solving the multi-objective optimization with NSGA-II (non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II) algorithm. The final result shows that the mechanism with the optimized parameters can eliminate the systematic coupling and enhance the dynamic performance greatly, which provides a solid mechanism hardware platform for designing the high-speed control system.

Almost all real-world and engineering problems involve multi-objective optimization of some sort that is often constrained. To solve these constrained multi-objective optimization problems, constrained multi-objective optimization evolutionary algorithms (CMOEAs) are enlisted. These CMOEAs require specific constraint handling techniques. This study aims to address and test the most successful constraint handling techniques, seven different penalty constraint techniques, as applied to the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II). In this paper, NSGA-II is chosen because of its high popularity amongst evolutionary algorithms. Inverted Generational Distance and Hypervolume are the main metrics that are discussed to compare the constraint handling techniques. NSGA-II is applied on 13 constrained multi-objective problems known as CF1-CF10, C1-DTLZ1, C2-DTLZ2, and C3-DTLZ4. The result of IGD and HV values are compared and the feasibility proportions of each combination on each problem are shown. The results of simulation present interesting findings that have been presented at the end of paper as discussion and conclusion.

Minimizing carbon emissions in power system operations has become a critical challenge as the energy sector transitions toward sustainability. This paper presents a high-fidelity simulation framework for CO<inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</inf>-optimized energy dispatch, employing an enhanced Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) tailored for emission-oriented optimization. Unlike traditional economic dispatch approaches that primarily focus on cost, the proposed framework explicitly minimizes total CO<inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</inf> emissions while ensuring demand–supply balance, operational limits, and ramp-rate feasibility. Key enhancements to the baseline NSGA-II include adaptive crossover–mutation operators, hybrid population initialization, and constraint-repair mechanisms, which improve convergence speed, robustness, and solution diversity. The framework is validated through multiple case studies incorporating stochastic load demand and renewable variability. Results show that the enhanced NSGA-II achieves nearly 20% emission reduction compared to baseline economic dispatch, with faster convergence and a broader Pareto-optimal solution set than standard NSGA-II. Furthermore, dispatch outcomes demonstrate increased reliance on renewable and storage units, reducing the share of coal and gas generation. These findings highlight the potential of the proposed approach to support low-carbon, policy-aligned energy system operations and provide a foundation for future extensions in multi-objective optimization, real-time scheduling, and carbon pricing integration.

This paper presents an application of non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II) technique for solving shortest path routing problems in computer networks. The problem is formulated as a non-linear constrained multi-objective optimisation problem. NSGA-II is applied to handle shortest path routing problem as a true multi-objective optimisation problem (MOOP) with competing and non-commensurable objectives. A priority-based encoding scheme is employed for population initialisation. Priorities are assigned to all the edges and NSGA-II is implemented to find the optimal solution. It is noted that this approach can find a diverse set of solutions and is converging near the true Pareto-optimal set. Results for a sample test network have been presented to demonstrate the capabilities of the NSGA-II algorithm to generate well-distributed Pareto-optimal solutions of shortest path routing problem in one single run. The results obtained by NSGA-II are compared with single objective weighting factor method for which genetic algorithm (GA) is applied.

This paper proposes an evolutionary alternative to conventional two-phase planning methods for solving the integrated crew scheduling (ICS) problem. The approach models and formulates the ICS problem as a combinational optimization problem with multiple constraints and objectives. An integrated evolutionary framework is proposed for simultaneously considering crew pairing and crew rostering subproblems. To improve the efficiency of the Pareto set explorer, the solution methodology applies a novel variant of the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II), one of the most popular multiobjective optimization evolutionary algorithms. The proposed variant features problem-dependent constraint handling and a bounded front policy to reserve diverse individuals. The proposed approach is verified and validated in a case study of a real-world short-haul airline crew scheduling problem. The experimental results obtained by the proposed integrated approach are then compared with a real-world airline plan generated by the conventional sequential method. An aircraft schedule recovery problem is also studied to compare solution performance between the conventional NSGA-II method and the proposed NSGA-II variant. The comparison results confirm that the proposed variant obtains solutions that are superior in two aspects: First, the proposed NSGA-II variant obtains better convergence in the studied problems compared with the original version; second, the results explored by the variant enable decision makers to select from multiple crew schedules, which are superior to the real-world airline crew plan while considering the same objectives and constraints.

Non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) deployment in future wireless networks has been recently considered a promising radio access technology to enhance spectral efficiency (SE). However, gain in SE comes always with the cost of energy efficiency (EE). In this paper, we investigate the SE and EE tradeoff in downlink NOMA with the consideration of quality of service (QoS) requirements based on three population-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs): multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO), non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II) and strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm-2 (SPEA2). The tradeoff is optimized and Pareto optimal solutions are obtained through MOEAs. The effectiveness of the algorithms is evaluated based on the hypervolume metric and the capability of solving multi-objective optimization problems. Simulation results reveal that SPEA2 outperforms NSGA-II and MOPSO. Furthermore, NSGA-II is the loser among all algorithms in terms of finding Pareto optimal results.

Numerical algorithms for generating an almost even approximation of the Pareto front in nonlinear multi-objective optimization problems

Water distribution networks (WDN) model optimization is an important part of smart water systems to achieve optimal strategies. WDN optimization focuses on the nonlinearity of the discharge head loss equation, the availability of discrete properties of pipe sizes, and the conservation of constraints. Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) have been proposed and successfully applied in the field of WDN design optimization. Previous studies have focused on comparing the optimization effects of algorithms in water distribution networks, ignoring the problems of unbalanced pressure distribution and water hammer at the nodes of the pipe network caused by the complex terrain in mountainous areas. In this paper, a multi-objective water supply optimization model that integrated cost, reliability, and water quality was established for a mountainous WDN in real engineering. The method of traversing the nodes to solve the water age was introduced to find a more scientific and practical water age solution model, with setting the weight function to evaluate the water age of the water supply model comprehensively. Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm II (SPEA-II) and Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) were adopted to optimize the WDN design model in the mountainous complex terrain. The significance levels of the number of Pareto solutions (NOPS) and running time are 0.029 and 0.001, respectively, indicating that the two algorithms have significant differences. Compared to NSGA-II, SPEA-II has a better convergence rate and running time in multi-objective water supply optimization design. The solution set distribution of SPEA-II is more concentrated than that of NSGA-II, also the numerical value is better. The number of SPEA-II optimization schemes is larger and the scheme is more effective. Among them, the Pareto solution set of SPEA-II can obtain more desirable optimization results on cost, reliability index (RI) and water age. In summary, the study provides valuable information for decision makers in WDN with complex terrain.