A Generalized Complementary Intersection Method (GCIM) for System Reliability Analysis

In order to ensure high reliability of complex engineered systems against deterioration or natural and man-made hazards, it is essential to have an efficient and accurate method for estimating the probability of system failure regardless of different system configurations (series, parallel, and mixed systems). Since system reliability prediction is of great importance in civil, aerospace, mechanical, and electrical engineering fields, its technical development will have an immediate and major impact on engineered system designs. To this end, this chapter presents a comprehensive review of advanced numerical methods for system reliability analysis under uncertainty. Offering excellent in-depth knowledge for readers, the chapter provides insights on the application of system reliability analysis methods to engineered systems and gives guidance on how we can predict system reliability for series, parallel, and mixed systems. Written for the professionals and researchers, the chapter is designed to awaken readers to the need and usefulness of advanced numerical methods for system reliability analysis.

In recent years, there often exist multiple priors from experienced experts or historical experiments with the rapid development of system structure in engineering fields. Bayesian Melding Method is commonly used for integrating multiple priors, which is based on the deterministic system structure. However, if the system model cannot be described by an explicit expression, the traditional Bayesian Melding Method is not feasible for system reliability analysis anymore. In order to describe the structure relationship clearly, Bayesian Network is applied in this paper to construct the complex system structure model and the system reliability is calculated by node probability tables rather than explicit expressions. Combining the advantages of the Bayesian Melding Method and Bayesian Network, a multi-prior integration and updating algorithm is developed for the system reliability analysis of complex system structures. Finally, a satellite attitude control system is used to demonstrate the proposed method. The system is established by the Bayesian Network and the comparison between natural prior and updated prior is discussed at length.

The relationship between the reliability probabilities of the component and the system is hard to get. If this relationship can be obtained easily, the reliability of the system can be calculated by using the reliability structures of the components. The common method to express this relationship is using the linear correlation index, which only shows the linear correlation between the components failure rather than the relationship between high nonlinear functions. In order to describe this relationship accurately and calculate the system reliability using the component reliability structures, a Uniform Design (UD)-Saddlepoint Approximation (SA)-based system reliability analysis method is proposed. The system reliability analysis method is decomposed to three simple steps: (1) calculating the weight coefficient which represents the contribution rate of each component to system reliability, (2) approximating Cumulant Generation Function (CGF) of each component, (3) calculating CGF of the system and approximating the system reliability with SA method. The weight coefficient of each component is derived from UD method, and a variable interval selection method is developed to decrease the required number of samples and increase the accuracy of the weight coefficients. First-Order Saddlepoint Approximation (FOSA) method or Mean-Value First-Order Saddlepoint Approximation (MVFOSA) method is used to analyze the CGF of a component performance function. Then the CGF of the system can be obtained by the weighted addition law by combining the CGFs of components performance functions with the weight coefficients. Finally, the system reliability can be approximated by SA method. Four examples are employed to demonstrate that the new method outperforms other methods for system reliability analysis in terms of efficiency and accuracy.

Based on the structure and operation mechanism of the dual-stage lithographic system, fault tree analysis for the key subsystem, wafer stage, is performed. Since the system is very complexity, the BDD (binary decision diagram) and DFTA (dynamic fault tree analysis) technique are introduced to make up the disadvantages of the traditional static FTA (fault tree analysis) method. Event “The kinematic accuracy of wafer stage can't meet the goal” is installed as the top event of the fault tree. Central factors affecting the kinematic accuracy of the wafer stage is identified through the study.

In most mechanical and structural systems, a certain amount of uncertainty exists in both strength and load values. The uncertainty of these values must be taken into consideration when quantifying the safety and reliability of a system. Fuzzy set theory has been used for the description and analysis of such systems. A means for comparing fuzzy strength and load values is needed to determine the safety and reliability of fuzzy mechanical and structural systems. The concepts of fuzzy bounds and subsethood are used here to define a safety index for mechanical or structural systems based on fuzzy load and strength values. Similarly, a criticality index for fracture damage assessment is defined based on fuzzy stress intensity factors. The concept of a fuzzy factor of safety is also introduced. The proposed safety and criticality indices and the fuzzy factor of safety could provide useful measures for rating designs in terms of strength-based reliability and damage tolerance. The application of the proposed measures in the assessment of damage as reported by online structural damage detection systems is also suggested.

Efficient system reliability analysis illustrated for a retaining wall and a soil slope

Components within a system may be related to one another in two primary ways: in either a serial or a parallel configuration. The other way associated system components is developed on the basis of series and parallel systems. Although some complex systems cannot generate from series and parallel system, the result of this paper is helpful to study more complex gradual system reliability problems. In this paper, a hypothesis is formed that the reliability of the components of the system is variable with time. Then, the reliability of the system is gradual, on condition that the components are combined by some related way. If the system reliability analysis is based on the static analysis, it may be different from the actual value of the reliability because the components of the system would afford stochastic load or generate degradation of performance. The method considering the random resistant degradation may make the result of reliability accurate. In this paper, gamma process is used to simulate the use of the components of the system, as deterioration is generally uncertain and non-decreasing, it can best be regarded as a gamma process. Combining the Edgeworth series method and forth moment technique, the method that calculate the reliability of series and parallel system is deduced. Then, the reliability of different systems and the failure rate of the systems are illustrated with time. The results show that the reliability of the systems will decline in different ways with time.

System reliability analysis by enhanced Monte Carlo simulation

Based on material taught at the University of California, Berkeley, this textbook offers a modern, rigorous and comprehensive treatment of the methods of structural and system reliability analysis. It covers the first- and second-order reliability methods for components and systems, simulation methods, time- and space-variant reliability, and Bayesian parameter estimation and reliability updating. It also presents more advanced, state-of-the-art topics such as finite-element reliability methods, stochastic structural dynamics, reliability-based optimal design, and Bayesian networks. A wealth of well-designed examples connect theory with practice, with simple examples demonstrating mathematical concepts and larger examples demonstrating their applications. End-of-chapter homework problems are included throughout. Including all necessary background material from probability theory, and accompanied online by a solutions manual and PowerPoint slides for instructors, this is the ideal text for senior undergraduate and graduate students taking courses on structural and system reliability in departments of civil, environmental and mechanical engineering.

PLIC-FSR-SYS: System reliability analysis based on parallel learning of influential components with filtered sample region

This paper presents a general mechanical system reliability modeling and analysis method, which consider the correlations of failure modes. Firstly, the performance functions which mathematically represent the failure modes are linearized based on FORM (First Order Reliability Methods), and the correlation coefficient matrix of those functions is calculated. Then, the PFTA (Probabilistic Fault Tree Analysis) method is adopted to establish the system reliability model which can take the correlations into account. Finally, effective algorithms such as G-FOMN (General First Order Multinormal Method) are used to quantify the system reliability, and the sensitivities of the system reliability index with respect to each failure mode, as well as the mean value and standard deviation of each random variable are also calculated. An engineering example demonstrates the applicability of the proposed method.

Based on material taught at the University of California, Berkeley, this textbook offers a modern, rigorous and comprehensive treatment of the methods of structural and system reliability analysis. It covers the first- and second-order reliability methods for components and systems, simulation methods, time- and space-variant reliability, and Bayesian parameter estimation and reliability updating. It also presents more advanced, state-of-the-art topics such as finite-element reliability methods, stochastic structural dynamics, reliability-based optimal design, and Bayesian networks. A wealth of well-designed examples connect theory with practice, with simple examples demonstrating mathematical concepts and larger examples demonstrating their applications. End-of-chapter homework problems are included throughout. Including all necessary background material from probability theory, and accompanied online by a solutions manual and PowerPoint slides for instructors, this is the ideal text for senior undergraduate and graduate students taking courses on structural and system reliability in departments of civil, environmental and mechanical engineering.

This paper presents a robust reliability analysis method for systems of multimodular redundant (MMR) controllers using the method of partitioning and parallel processing of a Markov chain (PPMC). A Markov chain is formulated to represent the N distinct states of the MMR controllers. Such a Markov chain has N2 directed edges, and each edge corresponds to a transition probability between a pair of start and end states. Because N can be easily increased substantially, the system reliability analysis may require large computational resources, such as the central processing unit usage and memory occupation. By the PPMC, a Markov chain's transition probability matrix can be partitioned and reordered, such that the system reliability can be evaluated through only the diagonal submatrices of the transition probability matrix. In addition, calculations regarding the submatrices are independent of each other and thus can be conducted in parallel to assure the efficiency. The simulation results show that, compared with the sequential method applied to an intact Markov chain, the proposed PPMC can improve the performance and produce allowable accuracy for the reliability analysis on large-scale systems of MMR controllers.

Traditionally structural safety considerations are based on checking safety at the component level. Only implicitly, adjustments of the required safety margins with respect to the system reliability aspect have been made in some cases. For example, in stability problems in soil mechanics the representative values of the soil properties are taken close to their means in order to take account of the averaging of the property fluctuations along the yield surfaces the sections of which are to be viewed as a parallel system. However, that almost all structures involve a system reliability aspect must be considered as common knowledge. It is recognized that some systems behave like series systems where system collapse is implied by the failure of a component in any of its failure modes. Such systems are correctly categorized as especially critical systems. It is also recognized that many civil engineering structures are redundant structures in the sense that given the (first) failure(s) of some component(s), element(s), joint(s), cross section(s), etc., the structural system not necessarily fails, too. Without such inherent redundancy many of damaged structures would actually have failed. Thus, redundancy has been identified as a desirable feature of a structure although it usually does not mean that the user will leave a structural component unrepaired once it failed. Vague notions like robustness have been introduced as requirements for structural design meaning essentially that after the failure of one component in an extreme loading event the structure still maintains its primary function though with somewhat reduced capability. And it is not surprising that already in the very early deterministic works on the subject the ductility of structural components has been identified as one of the dominating factors when assessing system reliability.

A new method for estimating the reliability of structural systems is proposed. The method is based on the use of Monte Carlo simulation. Monte Carlo based methods for system reliability analysis has several attractive features, the most important being that the system failure criterion is usually relatively easy to check almost irrespective of the complexity of the system. The disadvantage of such methods is the amount of computational efforts that may be involved. However, by reformulating the reliability problem to depend on a parameter and exploiting the regularity of the failure probability as a function of this parameter, it is shown that a substantial reduction of the computational efforts involved can be obtained.