• Home
  • Search
  • A global interdisciplinary platform for academic age-normalized researcher evaluation
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-026-05608-yCopy DOI Icon

A global interdisciplinary platform for academic age-normalized researcher evaluation

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Abstract Researchers’ performance is often evaluated quantitatively through metrics like the number of scientific papers, the number of citations these received, and the H-index, perpetuating the “Publish or Perish” culture. Yet such metrics have inherent biases favoring older, established researchers and fail to account for disciplinary differences or temporal relevance of contributions. To address this inequity, we aimed to create a global, age- and field-adjusted reference for evaluating scientific productivity. We developed a comprehensive worldwide reference database of researchers using publication and citation data from Scopus. The reference dataset includes 507,233 researchers from across the globe and facilitates the calculation of expected values for H-index, annual citations, and recent publications (within the past 5 years) for each percentile in every discipline. To account for disciplinary differences, we incorporated diverse publication types into the analysis tailored to each domain. The benchmarks utilized were stratified by career stage, assessed at each year after a researcher’s first publication. A composite score was developed to rank publication performance into deciles (D1–D10), where D1 represents the highest level of achievement. Importantly, only data from researchers within the same career stage and same scientific domain are used for comparison, ensuring fair and context-sensitive evaluations. To enhance accessibility, we established a web portal ( www.scientometrics.org/scopus ) to facilitate researcher benchmarking. This age- and discipline-normalized international database promotes the application of responsible metrics, offering a robust framework for global scientometric rankings. By providing an online analysis platform, we enable researchers, institutions, and policymakers to determine expected levels of scholarly output at the individual level while fostering fairness and equity in academic evaluation.

Similar Papers
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Scholar Metrics Scraper (SMS): automated retrieval of citation and author data.

  • Feb 22, 2024
  • Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics
  • Yutong Cao +4
  • PDF
  • Research Article

A survey of working conditions within biomedical research in the United Kingdom

  • Aug 16, 2017
  • F1000Research
  • Nick Riddiford
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations240

Clickstream Data Yields High-Resolution Maps of Science

  • Mar 11, 2009
  • PLoS ONE
  • Johan Bollen +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations9

Striving toward Community-Engaged and Participatory Methods: Considerations for Researchers in Academic Settings

  • Dec 22, 2022
  • Social Work Research
  • Sarah C Narendorf +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations25

To what extent is researchers' data-sharing motivated by formal mechanisms of recognition and credit?

  • Feb 05, 2021
  • Scientometrics
  • Pablo Dorta-González +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Evaluating eDNA metabarcoding for fish biodiversity assessment in Nigerian aquatic ecosystems: potential, limitations, and comparisons with traditional methods

  • Aug 04, 2025
  • Journal of Freshwater Ecology
  • Lotanna M Nneji +5
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

ChatGPT and OpenAI: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Review

  • Sep 29, 2023
  • Journal of Soft Computing and Decision Analytics
  • Abdullah Önden +1
  • Research Article

Iran's global scientific growth in the medical sciences: A 23-year Scientometric Evaluation

  • Sep 01, 2020
  • Trauma monthly
  • Jamile Mohammadi +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations94

Specific and general information sharing among competing academic researchers

  • Oct 11, 2013
  • Research Policy
  • Carolin Haeussler +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations46

A manager's guide to using eDNA metabarcoding in marine ecosystems.

  • Nov 15, 2022
  • PeerJ
  • Zachary Gold +11
  • Research Article

Accounting for Intra- and Intergenomic Sequence Variation in Reference Barcodes Improves eDNA Metabarcoding Biodiversity Assessment.

  • Mar 27, 2026
  • Molecular ecology resources
  • Luke J Mccartin +11
  • Research Article
  • Citations11

Wildlife trade investigations benefit from multivariate stable isotope analyses.

  • Dec 27, 2024
  • Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
  • Tracey-Leigh Prigge +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations12

Postnovo: Postprocessing Enables Accurate and FDR-Controlled de Novo Peptide Sequencing.

  • Oct 02, 2018
  • Journal of proteome research
  • Samuel E Miller +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations14

Nanogauges gratings for strain determination at nanoscale

  • Aug 31, 2017
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Joseph Marae Djouda +5
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

SciRus: Tiny and Powerful Multilingual Encoder for Scientific Texts

  • Dec 01, 2024
  • Doklady Mathematics
  • N Gerasimenko +3
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.