A method for predicting protein complex in dynamic PPI networks

Protein complexes play significant roles in cellular processes. Identifying protein complexes from protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks is an effective strategy to understand biological processes and cellular functions. A number of methods have recently been proposed to detect protein complexes. However, most of methods predict protein complexes from static PPI networks, and usually overlook the inherent dynamics and topological properties of protein complexes. In this paper, we proposed a novel method, called NABCAM (Neighbor Affinity-Based Core-Attachment Method), to identify protein complexes from dynamic PPI networks. Firstly, the centrality score of every protein is calculated. The proteins with the highest centrality scores are regarded as the seed proteins. Secondly, the seed proteins are expanded to complex cores by calculating the similarity values between the seed proteins and their neighboring proteins. Thirdly, the attachments are appended to their corresponding protein complex cores by comparing the affinity among neighbors inside the core, against that outside the core. Finally, filtering processes are carried out to obtain the final clustering result. The result in the DIP database shows that the NABCAM algorithm can predict protein complexes effectively in comparison with other state-of-the-art methods. Moreover, many protein complexes predicted by our method are biologically significant.

A method for identifying protein complexes with the features of joint co-localization and joint co-expression in static PPI networks

Protein complexes play a critical role in many biological processes. Identifying the component proteins in a protein complex is an important step in understanding the complex as well as the related biological activities. This paper addresses the problem of predicting protein complexes from the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of one species using a computational approach. Most of the previous methods rely on the assumption that proteins within the same complex would have relatively more interactions. This translates into dense subgraphs in the PPI network. However, the existing software tools have limited success. Recently, Gavin et al. (2006) provided a detailed study on the organization of protein complexes and suggested that a complex consists of two parts: a core and an attachment. Based on this core-attachment concept, we developed a novel approach to identify complexes from the PPI network by identifying their cores and attachments separately. We evaluated the effectiveness of our proposed approach using three different datasets and compared the quality of our predicted complexes with three existing tools. The evaluation results show that we can predict many more complexes and with higher accuracy than these tools with an improvement of over 30%. To verify the cores we identified in each complex, we compared our cores with the mediators produced by Andreopoulos et al. (2007), which were claimed to be the cores, based on the benchmark result produced by Gavin et al. (2006). We found that the cores we produced are of much higher quality ranging from 10- to 30-fold more correctly predicted cores and with better accuracy. (http://alse.cs.hku.hk/complexes/).

BackgroundIdentifying protein complexes plays an important role for understanding cellular organization and functional mechanisms. As plenty of evidences have indicated that dense sub-networks in dynamic protein-protein interaction network (DPIN) usually correspond to protein complexes, identifying protein complexes is formulated as density-based clustering.MethodsIn this paper, a new approach named iOPTICS-GSO is developed, which is the improved Ordering Points to Identify the Clustering Structure (OPTICS) algorithm with Glowworm swarm optimization algorithm (GSO) to optimize the parameters in OPTICS when finding dense sub-networks. In our iOPTICS-GSO, the concept of core node is redefined and the Euclidean distance in OPTICS is replaced with the improved similarity between the nodes in the PPI network according to their interaction strength, and dense sub-networks are considered as protein complexes.ResultsThe experiment results have shown that our iOPTICS-GSO outperforms of algorithms such as DBSCAN, CFinder, MCODE, CMC, COACH, ClusterOne MCL and OPTICS_PSO in terms of f-measure and p-value on four DPINs, which are from the DIP, Krogan, MIPS and Gavin datasets. In addition, our predicted protein complexes have a small p-value and thus are highly likely to be true protein complexes.ConclusionThe proposed iOPTICS-GSO gains optimal clustering results by adopting GSO algorithm to optimize the parameters in OPTICS, and the result on four datasets shows superior performance. What’s more, the results provided clues for biologists to verify and find new protein complexes.

BackgroundProtein complexes play an important role in cellular mechanisms. Recently, several methods have been presented to predict protein complexes in a protein interaction network. In these methods, a protein complex is predicted as a dense subgraph of protein interactions. However, interactions data are incomplete and a protein complex does not have to be a complete or dense subgraph.ResultsWe propose a more appropriate protein complex prediction method, CFA, that is based on connectivity number on subgraphs. We evaluate CFA using several protein interaction networks on reference protein complexes in two benchmark data sets (MIPS and Aloy), containing 1142 and 61 known complexes respectively. We compare CFA to some existing protein complex prediction methods (CMC, MCL, PCP and RNSC) in terms of recall and precision. We show that CFA predicts more complexes correctly at a competitive level of precision.ConclusionsMany real complexes with different connectivity level in protein interaction network can be predicted based on connectivity number. Our CFA program and results are freely available from http://www.bioinf.cs.ipm.ir/softwares/cfa/CFA.rar.

The identification of temporal protein complexes would make great contribution to our knowledge of the dynamic organization characteristics in protein interaction networks (PINs). Recent studies have focused on integrating gene expression data into static PIN to construct dynamic PIN which reveals the dynamic evolutionary procedure of protein interactions, but they fail in practice for recognizing the active time points of proteins with low or high expression levels. We construct a Time-Evolving PIN (TEPIN) with a novel method called Deviation Degree, which is designed to identify the active time points of proteins based on the deviation degree of their own expression values. Owing to the differences between protein interactions, moreover, we weight TEPIN with connected affinity and gene co-expression to quantify the degree of these interactions. To validate the efficiencies of our methods, ClusterONE, CAMSE and MCL algorithms are applied on the TEPIN, DPIN (a dynamic PIN constructed with state-of-the-art three-sigma method) and SPIN (the original static PIN) to detect temporal protein complexes. Each algorithm on our TEPIN outperforms that on other networks in terms of match degree, sensitivity, specificity, F-measure and function enrichment etc. In conclusion, our Deviation Degree method successfully eliminates the disadvantages which exist in the previous state-of-the-art dynamic PIN construction methods. Moreover, the biological nature of protein interactions can be well described in our weighted network. Weighted TEPIN is a useful approach for detecting temporal protein complexes and revealing the dynamic protein assembly process for cellular organization.

Signal flow direction is one of the most important features of the protein-protein interactions in signaling networks. However, almost all the outcomes of current high-throughout techniques for protein-protein interactions mapping are usually supposed to be non-directional. Based on the pairwise interaction domains, here we defined a novel parameter protein interaction directional score and then used it to predict the direction of signal flow between proteins in proteome-wide signaling networks. Using 5-fold cross-validation, our approach obtained a satisfied performance with the accuracy 89.79%, coverage 48.08%, and error ratio 16.91%. As an application, we established an integrated human directional protein interaction network, including 2,237 proteins and 5,530 interactions, and inferred a large amount of novel signaling pathways. Directional protein interaction network was strongly supported by the known signaling pathways literature (with the 87.5% accuracy) and further analyses on the biological annotation, subcellular localization, and network topology property. Thus, this study provided an effective method to define the upstream/downstream relations of interacting protein pairs and a powerful tool to unravel the unknown signaling pathways.

Protein complexes are aggregates of protein molecules that play important roles in biological processes. Detecting protein complexes from protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks is one of the most challenging problems in computational biology, and many computational methods have been developed to solve this problem. Generally, these methods yield high false positive rates. In this article, a semantic similarity measure between proteins, based on Gene Ontology (GO) structure, is applied to weigh PPI networks. Consequently, one of the well-known methods, COACH, has been improved to be compatible with weighted PPI networks for protein complex detection. The new method, WCOACH, is compared to the COACH, ClusterOne, IPCA, CORE, OH-PIN, HC-PIN and MCODE methods on several PPI networks such as DIP, Krogan, Gavin 2002 and MIPS. WCOACH can be applied as a fast and high-performance algorithm to predict protein complexes in weighted PPI networks. All data and programs are freely available at http://bioinformatics.aut.ac.ir/wcoach.

BackgroundUnderstanding protein complexes is important for understanding the science of cellular organization and function. Many computational methods have been developed to identify protein complexes from experimentally obtained protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks. However, interaction information obtained experimentally can be unreliable and incomplete. Reconstructing these PPI networks with PPI evidences from other sources can improve protein complex identification.ResultsWe combined PPI information from 6 different sources and obtained a reconstructed PPI network for yeast through machine learning. Some popular protein complex identification methods were then applied to detect yeast protein complexes using the new PPI networks. Our evaluation indicates that protein complex identification algorithms using the reconstructed PPI network significantly outperform ones on experimentally verified PPI networks.ConclusionsWe conclude that incorporating PPI information from other sources can improve the effectiveness of protein complex identification.

Identification of protein complexes is critical to understand complex formation and protein functions. Recent advances in high-throughput experiments have provided large data sets of protein-protein interactions (PPIs). Many approaches, based on the assumption that complexes are dense subgraphs of PPI networks (PINs in short), have been proposed to predict complexes using graph clustering methods. In this paper, we introduce a novel from-function-to-interaction paradigm for protein complex detection. As proteins perform biological functions by forming complexes, we first cluster proteins using biology process (BP) annotations from gene ontology (GO). Then, we map the resulting protein clusters onto a PPI network (PIN in short), extract connected subgraphs consisting of clustered proteins from the PPI network and expand each connected subgraph with protein nodes that have rich links to the proteins in the subgraph. Such expanded subgraphs are taken as predicted complexes. We apply the proposed method (called CPredictor) to two PPI data sets of S. cerevisiae for predicting protein complexes. Experimental results show that CPredictor outperforms the existing methods. The outstanding precision of CPredictor proves that the from-function-to-interaction paradigm provides a new and effective way to computational detection of protein complexes.

Glutamatergic synapses encode information from extracellular inputs using dynamic protein interaction networks (PINs) that undergo widespread reorganization following synaptic activity, allowing cells to distinguish between signaling inputs and generate coordinated cellular responses. Here, we investigate how Fragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein (FMRP) deficiency disrupts signal transduction through a glutamatergic synapse PIN downstream of NMDA receptor or metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) stimulation. In cultured cortical neurons or acute cortical slices from P7, P17 and P60 FMR1-/y mice, the unstimulated protein interaction network state resembled that of wildtype littermates stimulated with mGluR agonists, demonstrating resting state pre-activation of mGluR signaling networks. In contrast, interactions downstream of NMDAR stimulation were similar to WT. We identified the Src family kinase (SFK) Fyn as a network hub, because many interactions involving Fyn were pre-activated in FMR1-/y animals. We tested whether targeting SFKs in FMR1-/y mice could modify disease phenotypes, and found that Saracatinib (SCB), an SFK inhibitor, normalized elevated basal protein synthesis, novel object recognition memory and social behavior in FMR1-/y mice. However, SCB treatment did not normalize the PIN to a wild-type-like state in vitro or in vivo, but rather induced extensive changes to protein complexes containing Shank3, NMDARs and Fyn. We conclude that targeting abnormal nodes of a PIN can identify potential disease-modifying drugs, but behavioral rescue does not correlate with PIN normalization.

BackgroundMost proteins form macromolecular complexes to perform their biological functions. However, experimentally determined protein complex data, especially of those involving more than two protein partners, are relatively limited in the current state-of-the-art high-throughput experimental techniques. Nevertheless, many techniques (such as yeast-two-hybrid) have enabled systematic screening of pairwise protein-protein interactions en masse. Thus computational approaches for detecting protein complexes from protein interaction data are useful complements to the limited experimental methods. They can be used together with the experimental methods for mapping the interactions of proteins to understand how different proteins are organized into higher-level substructures to perform various cellular functions.ResultsGiven the abundance of pairwise protein interaction data from high-throughput genome-wide experimental screenings, a protein interaction network can be constructed from protein interaction data by considering individual proteins as the nodes, and the existence of a physical interaction between a pair of proteins as a link. This binary protein interaction graph can then be used for detecting protein complexes using graph clustering techniques. In this paper, we review and evaluate the state-of-the-art techniques for computational detection of protein complexes, and discuss some promising research directions in this field.ConclusionsExperimental results with yeast protein interaction data show that the interaction subgraphs discovered by various computational methods matched well with actual protein complexes. In addition, the computational approaches have also improved in performance over the years. Further improvements could be achieved if the quality of the underlying protein interaction data can be considered adequately to minimize the undesirable effects from the irrelevant and noisy sources, and the various biological evidences can be better incorporated into the detection process to maximize the exploitation of the increasing wealth of biological knowledge available.

Protein Complex Detection in PPI Network by Identifying Mutually Exclusive Protein-protein Interactions

Protein–protein interaction (PPI) data derived from biological experiments include many false-positive interactions which are treated equally as other real physical interactions, thereby complicating the detection of real protein complexes from protein–protein interaction (PPI) networks. In this paper, a new weighting method, named as cwMINE (combined weight of module identification in networks), for detecting protein complexes efficiently in protein interaction networks is presented. cwMINE has a good combination between network topology and biological feature, which can solve false positives efficiently of PPI networks and make discovered protein complexes higher quality. In addition, a new expanding rule during the detection process, namely, expanding coefficient, is developed to filter edges with lower weights. The proposed method is compared with several state- of-the-art algorithms in three yeast PPI networks with two benchmark data sets. The experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms the other algorithms in most datasets in terms of the evaluation metrics. We further validate the effectiveness of our method on a human PPI network constructed from the HPRD dataset to identify important disease-related functional modules and provided valuable indications for disease treatment.

The high-throughput technologies have led to vast amounts of protein-protein interaction (PPI) data, and a number of approaches based on PPI networks have been proposed for protein function prediction. However, these approaches do not work well if there is not enough PPI information. To address this issue, we propose a novel collective classification based approach that combines protein sequence information and PPI information to improve the prediction performance. We first reconstruct a PPI network by adding a number of computed edges based on protein sequence similarity, and then apply a collective classification algorithm to predict protein function based on the new PPI network. Experiments over two real datasets demonstrate that our approach outperforms most of existing approaches across a series of label situations, especially in sparsely-labeled networks where the existing approaches fail because of PPI information inadequacy. Experimental results also validate the robustness of our approach to the number of labeled proteins in PPI networks.