A Model-Based Evolutionary Algorithm for Bi-objective Optimization

This study compared the performances of three state-of-theart evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms: the Non-Dominated Sorted Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), the Epsilon-Dominance Non-Dominated Sorted Genetic Algorithm II (e -NSGA-II) and the Epsilon-Dominance Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm ( e MOEA), on a constrained biobjective crop-mix planning problem (BCP). The BCP test case objectives were to: (i) maximize crop production and (ii) minimize planting area. The BCP problem was enumerated to provide the true Pareto-optimal solution set to facilitate rigorous testing of the evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms. The performances of the three algorithms were assessed and compared using three performance metrics (additive epsilon indicator, inverted generational distance and spacing). For the comparative study, a graphical comparison with respect to true Pareto front of optimal crop planning problem was provided. Results of the analyses indicated that the e MOEA greatly outperforms the NSGAII and the e -NSGA-II.

The Pareto front (Pareto set) of a continuous optimization problem with m objectives is a (m-1) dimensional piecewise continuous manifold in the objective space (the decision space) under some mild conditions. Based on this regularity property in the objective space, we have recently developed several multiobjective estimation of distribution algorithms (EDAs). However, this property has not been utilized in the decision space. Using the regularity property in both the objective and decision space, this paper proposes a simple EDA for multiobjective optimization. Since the location information has not efficiently used in EDAs, a combination of EDA and differential evolution (DE) is suggested for improving the algorithmic performance. The hybrid method and the pure EDA method proposed in this paper, and a DE based method are compared on several test instances. Experimental results have shown that the algorithm with the proposed strategy is very promising.

The model-based evolutionary algorithms are divided into three groups: estimation of distribution algorithms, inverse modeling, and surrogate modeling. Existing inverse modeling is mainly applied to solve multi-objective optimization problems and is not suitable for many-objective optimization problems. Some inversed-model techniques, such as the inversed-model of multi-objective evolutionary algorithm, constructed from the Pareto front (PF) to the Pareto solution on nondominated solutions using a random grouping method and Gaussian process, were introduced. However, some of the most efficient inverse models might be eliminated during this procedure. Also, there are challenges, such as the presence of many local PFs and developing poor solutions when the population has no evident regularity. This paper proposes inverse modeling using random forest regression and uniform reference points that map all nondominated solutions from the objective space to the decision space to solve many-objective optimization problems. The proposed algorithm is evaluated using the benchmark test suite for evolutionary algorithms. The results show an improvement in diversity and convergence performance (quality indicators).

In recent years, numerous efficient and effective multimodal multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MMOEAs) have been developed to address multimodal multi-objective optimization problems (MMOPs) involving multiple equivalent sets of Pareto optimal solutions to be found simultaneously. However, the Pareto optimal solutions may have various contracting or expending shapes, and have random locations in the decision space. In addition, uniform decision distribution does not imply good objective distribution. Therefore, many existing MMOEAs are very difficult to guide the individuals converged to every Pareto subregion with good distribution in both the decision space and the objective space. In this paper, we present a multi-population evolutionary algorithm to search for the equivalent global Pareto optimal solutions. The original population should be divided into two groups of subpopulations with equal size. The first subpopulation is designed to search for the optimal solutions in objective space. At the same time. the second subpopulation focus to obtain high-quality optimal solutions in the decision space. The multi-population strategy is helpful to improve the decision and objective distributions simultaneously, and address the MMOPs effectively. The proposed algorithm is compared against five state-of-the-art MMOEAs. The experimental results indicate the proposed algorithm provides better performance than competing MMOEAs on IEEE CEC 2019 MMOPs test suite.

Multi-objective flow shop scheduling plays a key role in real-life scheduling problem which attract the researcher attention. The primary concern is to find the best sequence for flow shop scheduling problem. Estimation of Distribution Algorithms (EDAs) has gained sufficient attention from the researchers and it provides prominent results as an alternate of traditional evolutionary algorithms. In this paper, we propose the pareto optimal block-based EDA using bivariate model for multi-objective flow shop scheduling problem. We apply a bivariate probabilistic model to generate block which have the better diversity. We employ the non-dominated sorting technique to filter the solutions. To check the performance of proposed approach, we test it on the benchmark problems available in OR-library and then we compare it with non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II). Computational results show that pareto optimal BBEDA provides better result and better convergence than NSGA-II.

Almost all real-world and engineering problems involve multi-objective optimization of some sort that is often constrained. To solve these constrained multi-objective optimization problems, constrained multi-objective optimization evolutionary algorithms (CMOEAs) are enlisted. These CMOEAs require specific constraint handling techniques. This study aims to address and test the most successful constraint handling techniques, seven different penalty constraint techniques, as applied to the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II). In this paper, NSGA-II is chosen because of its high popularity amongst evolutionary algorithms. Inverted Generational Distance and Hypervolume are the main metrics that are discussed to compare the constraint handling techniques. NSGA-II is applied on 13 constrained multi-objective problems known as CF1-CF10, C1-DTLZ1, C2-DTLZ2, and C3-DTLZ4. The result of IGD and HV values are compared and the feasibility proportions of each combination on each problem are shown. The results of simulation present interesting findings that have been presented at the end of paper as discussion and conclusion.

Recent studies on molecular level classification of tissues with DNA microarray technology have produced remarkable results. It is believed that the subtypes of cancer can be distinguished by a set of discriminative genes. To achieve this goal, it not only requires high enough classification accuracy, but also a minimal number of genes as much as possible to lower cost. Meanwhile, the number of samples from different tissues may differ greatly. Therefore, it should also avoid classification bias due to unbalance sample number in different classes. In this paper, we propose a new multi-objective evolutional algorithm (MOEA) framework to select optimal genes, which has both advantages of the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) and the estimation of distribution algorithm (EDA). Finally, experiment on the data is done, The result shows that our method has good performance.

Recently, evolutionary algorithms that can efficiently solve decomposable binary optimization problems have been developed. They are so-called model-based evolutionary algorithms, which build a model for generating solution candidates by applying a machine learning technique to a population. Their central procedure is linkage detection that reveals a problem structure, that is, how the entire problem consists of sub-problems. However, the model-based evolutionary algorithms have been shown to be ineffective for problems that do not have relevant structures or those whose structures are hard to identify. Therefore, evolutionary algorithms that can solve both types of problems quickly, reliably, and accurately are required. The objective of the paper is to investigate whether the evolutionary algorithm evolving developmental timings (EDT) that we previously proposed can be the desired one. The EDT makes some variables values more quickly converge than the remains for any problems, and then, decides values of the remains to obtain a higher fitness value under the fixation of the variables values. In addition, factors to decide which variable values converge more quickly, that is, developmental timings are evolution targets. Simulation results reveal that the EDT has worse performance than the linkage tree genetic algorithm (LTGA), which is one of the state-of-the-art model-based evolutionary algorithms, for decomposable problems and also that the difference in the performance between them becomes smaller for problems with overlaps among linkages and also that the EDT has better performance than the LTGA for problems whose structures are hard to identify. Those results suggest that an appropriate search strategy is different between decomposable problems and those hard to decompose.

Network reconfiguration is an alternative to reduce power losses and optimize the operation of power distribution systems. In this paper, an encoding scheme for evolutionary algorithms is proposed in order to search efficiently for the Pareto-optimal solutions during the reconfiguration of power distribution systems considering multiobjective optimization. The encoding scheme is based on the edge window decoder (EWD) technique, which was embedded in the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm 2 (SPEA2) and the Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II). The effectiveness of the encoding scheme was proved by solving a test problem for which the true Pareto-optimal solutions are known in advance. In order to prove the practicability of the encoding scheme, a real distribution system was used to find the near Pareto-optimal solutions for different objective functions to optimize.

In order to obtain higher quality silicon single crystal, a hybrid strategy for modeling of Czochralski silicon crystal growth and optimizing of process parameters is presented in the paper. The hybrid strategy includes the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method, neural network of group method of data handing (GMDH), and improved nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA‐II). The shape variable of solid‐liquid interface h and the defect evaluation criteria V/G are set to objective functions according to engineering experience and process requirement. The polynomial of the objective functions is produced by GMDH and CFD. Ultimately, an improved elitist strategy and crowding distance NSGA‐II is proposed in the paper to obtain the Pareto optimum solution by the objective functions identified by the GMDH. Compared with other optimization algorithms, the improved NSGA‐II can increase the lateral diversity and the uniform distribution of the nondominated solutions. Engineering validation proved that the proposed hybrid strategy can effectively solve the complex uncertain multiobjective optimization problem of system and provides a new method for obtaining high‐quality crystal growth process parameters.

For a high-speed and high-acceleration planar parallel mechanism, a design for control (DFC) approach is proposed for the optimization of the mechanism structure. Several evaluation indexes of kinematics and dynamics performance are established for the object functions and constraints, and then a standard multi-objective optimization problem can be formed. The dimension synthesis is carried out by solving the multi-objective optimization with NSGA-II (non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II) algorithm. The final result shows that the mechanism with the optimized parameters can eliminate the systematic coupling and enhance the dynamic performance greatly, which provides a solid mechanism hardware platform for designing the high-speed control system.

Multi-objective Cascade Control of Regulatory Process with Two Conflicting Objectives

Optimization of some properties of hydraulic asphalt concrete mix using RSM and NSGA-II

Finding a good Pareto front (PF) approximation and locating sufficient equivalent Pareto optimal solutions are two important goals of the multimodal multiobjective optimization (MMO). Preserving the diversity in decision and objective spaces is a core task in the MMO accordingly. Although various “soft isolation” approaches, such as niching methods, have been proposed to promote the diversity and find multiple Pareto optimal solutions in the decision space, they may perform poorly on complex MMO problems (MMOPs) due to high environmental selection pressure and complex geometry of Pareto optimal sets (PSs). To alleviate the above-mentioned challenging task, a “hard/physical isolation” method called zoning search (ZS) is proposed to maintain the diversity in the decision space and reduce the problem complexity in this article. In the ZS, some decision variables of MMOPs are selected randomly and then divided into several segments, i.e., the entire search space is partitioned into many subspaces. Clearly, the population diversity can be naturally maintained in the decision space and the problem complexity is reduced by the ZS in each subspace. The effectiveness of the ZS is systematically evaluated by 11 recently proposed MMOPs. The experimental results demonstrate that the ZS can effectively assist a selected multimodal multiobjective evolutionary algorithm (MMOEA) in finding more and better distributed equivalent Pareto optimal solutions in the decision space, and keep its performance in the objective space unchanged. Additionally, if additional computational resources are given, the ZS can further help the selected MMOEA to improve its performance in the decision space when compared with a soft isolation method used in the corresponding MMOEA. Overall, the ZS is a simple and promising approach to balance the broad search and the deep search in solving MMOPs.

A Multiobjective Optimization Problem (MOP) requires the optimization of several objective functions simultaneously, usually in conflict with each other. One of the most efficient algorithms for solving MOPs is MOEA/D (Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition), which decomposes a MOP into single-objective optimization subproblems and solves them using information from neighboring subproblems. MOEA/D variants with other evolutionary operators have emerged over the years, improving their efficiency in various MOPs. Recently, the IWOA (Improved Whale Optimization Algorithm) was proposed, an optimization algorithm bioinspired by the whale hunting method hybridized with Differential Evolution, which presented excellent results in single-objective optimization problems. This work proposes the MOEA/D-IWOA algorithm, which associates characteristics of the evolutionary operators of the IWOA to MOEA/D. Computational experiments were accomplished to analyze the performance of the MOEA/D-IWOA in benchmark MOPs suites. The results were compared with those obtained by the MOEA/D, Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), Third Evolution Step of Generalized Differential Evolution (GDE3), Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm (SPEA2), and Indicator-Based Evolutionary Algorithm (IBEA) algorithms in the Hypervolume and Inverted Generational Distance Plus (IGD+) indicators. The MOEA/D-IWOA proved to be competitive, with a good performance profile, in addition to presenting the best results in some POMs.