A Multi-objective and Multidisciplinary Optimisation Algorithm for Microelectromechanical Systems

Hybrid-Game Strategies for multi-objective design optimization in engineering

The optimal design of multidisciplinary systems under uncertainty involves three types of iterative analyses- multidisciplinary analyses, reliability analyses, and optimization. If these processes are carried out in a nested manner in reliability based multidisciplinary design optimization (RBMDO), the computational expense can be enormous. Computationally efficient simultaneous analysis and design (SAND) or All-AtOnce methods have been developed earlier for deterministic MDO. Single loop RBDO methods have also been developed to integrate reliability analysis and optimization in a single loop. This paper develops a novel formulation of RBMDO problems with both system and component level reliability constraints. The formulation allows for solution with a single design optimization loop by using the KKT optimality conditions of the first-order reliability method (FORM) as constraints in the design optimization along with disciplinary consistency constraints. Alternative solution processes which remove the FORM MPP’s from the decision space and many constraints from the problem are developed. The alternative solution methods are more efficient and more robust than using nonlinear programming to solve the single loop formulation. A numerical example is solved with the two proposed solution algorithms. I. Introduction In the design of multidisciplinary systems it is often necessary to make decisions under uncertainty. This requires that multidisciplinary systems modeling be integrated with uncertainty analysis and optimization. A common example of such an engineering design application would be the design of an aircraft wing under uncertain aerodynamic loading conditions, with multiple structural components with uncertain capacities, such that the entire structural system achieves a prescribed level of reliability. The problem has coupled physics, in that the pressure distribution is dependent upon the deflection, and the deflection is dependent on the pressure distribution. Such designs have been performed using multidisciplinary optimization (MDO). Other examples where MDO may be applied include electronics packaging, in which the disciplines of heat transfer and circuit analysis are coupled, the design of new types of aircraft and integrating them into an existing fleet of aircraft, and even the management of interconnected homeland infrastructures. While MDO has matured with the development of different types of algorithms for various types of problems and design organizations, there has been little work to incorporate reliability analysis into MDO. However, system and component reliabilities are often a major concern in the design of multidisciplinary systems. MDO can be computationally expensive due to the need to achieve consistency across multiple disciplinary analysis codes; each disciplinary analysis code may be computationally expensive to run. Further, the optimal design of multidisciplinary systems under uncertainty involves three types of iterative procedures- multidisciplinary analyses, reliability analyses, and optimization. The integration of these three procedures is referred to in this paper as reliability based multidisciplinary design optimization (RBMDO). If these processes are carried out simultaneously, the computational expense can be enormous. Computational savings can often be achieved with simultaneous analysis and design (SAND) or All-At-Once methods, which allow for the solution of the multidisciplinary analyses and the optimization in one single loop. Single loop RBDO methods allow for the integration of reliability analysis and optimization in a single loop. Applying SAND and single-loop RBDO together may allow for large computational savings when applied to problems in RBMDO. This paper develops a novel formulation of RBMDO problems with both system and component level reliability constraints based on the SAND method for MDO and by use of the KKT conditions of the first order reliability method (FORM). The resulting formulation may be solved as a standard nonlinear programming problem. While the single loop formulation presented in this paper is a solution of the RBMDO problem, robustness and efficiency are improved through two improved algorithms which can remove the MPP’s from the decision space, thereby significantly reducing the optimizer’s workload.

Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) supports the system-level design of complex products effectively. Currently, system design and optimization for complex products are two distinct processes that must be executed using different software or platforms, involving intricate data conversion processes. Applying multidisciplinary optimization to validate system optimization often necessitates remodeling the optimization objects, which is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and highly error-prone. A critical activity in systems engineering is identifying the optimal design solution for the entire system. Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) and reliability analysis are essential methods for achieving this. This paper proposes a SysML-based multidisciplinary reliability design optimization modeling method. First, by analyzing the definitions and mathematical models of multidisciplinary reliability design optimization, the SysML extension mechanism is employed to represent the optimization model based on SysML. Next, model transformation techniques are used to convert the SysML optimization model generated in the first stage into an XML description model readable by optimization solvers. Finally, the proposed method’s effectiveness is validated through an engineering case study of an in-vehicle environmental control integration system. The results demonstrate that this method fully utilizes SysML to express MDO problems, enhancing the efficiency of design optimization for complex systems. Engineers and system designers working on complex, multidisciplinary projects can particularly benefit from these advancements, as they simplify the integration of design and optimization processes, facilitating more reliable and efficient product development.

This paper presents a framework for multi-objective and multidisciplinary design optimization using highfidelity analysis tools. In this framework the aerodynamic performance is evaluated based on a Navier‐Stokes equation solver, and the structure dynamics is computed using commercially available finite element software. We employ a genetic algorithm as a robust design optimization tool to facilitate the multi-objective optimization. We also use the response surface approach to tackle the difficulties associated with the organizational complexity and computational burden inherent in the multidisciplinary optimization. The coupling between the fluid solver and structural solver is realized through a thin-plate spline interpolation algorithm. The proposed approach is then used to perform aerostructural optimization of a three-dimensional transonic compressor blade. Our numerical results show that this method can improve the existing design and reduce the required computational time by orders of magnitude.

:A robust multi-objective wing design optimization procedure using CFD is presented in this work. Instead of directly applying CFD to wing design optimization, a Kriging aerodynamic model that approximates CFD result is proposed to save computational cost. By introducing 6σ robust approach as a sub-objective function, multi-objective wing design problems can be solved with aerodynamic robustness. Non-Uniform Rational B-Spline curves (NURBS) are introduced to depict the wing geometry in design optimization process. The most important parameters of the wing geometry can then be screened by design of experiment and treated as design variables due to the local variation property of NURBS. Under this formulation, a multi-objective genetic algorithm based on non-dominated sorting is employed to handle multiple flight conditions in wing design. The optimum wing geometry is selected according to trade-off among design objects on the non-dominated front. To validate the proposed approach, two robust design optimization cases are studied for ONERA-M6-Wing. It turns out that the drag coefficient is insensitive to Mach number between Ma0.8–Ma0.9 after robust optimization. The result also verifies the effectiveness of our method in boosting performance and robustness of multiple flight conditions: the lift curve slope (Ma0.3) of optimum wing and the 6σ objective function of transonic drag (Ma0.8–Ma0.9) increase by 11.9% and 25.4%, respectively. Observations in the optimization cases are concluded as follows: 1) For wing aerodynamic design problems, the multi-objective robust optimization can both improve the performance at different flight conditions and provide robustness. 2) The Kriging aerodynamic model derived from CFD result can satisfy the precision requirement of wing design. 3) Even though the optimization result is subject to the weights of the 6σ function in sub-object, the influence is not comparable to the trade-off among design objects. 4) The optimum solution obtained by proposed approach is superior to gradient based optimization method, while the computational cost is acceptable.

This article focuses on the efficient multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm to solve multidisciplinary design optimization problems. The objective is to extend the formulation of collaborative optimization which has been widely used to solve single-objective optimization problems. To examine the proposed structure, racecar design problem is taken as an example of application for three objective functions. In addition, a fuzzy decision maker is applied to select the best solution along the pareto front based on the defined criteria. The results are compared to the traditional optimization, and collaborative optimization formulations that do not use multi-objective particle swarm optimization. It is shown that the integration of multi-objective particle swarm optimization into collaborative optimization provides an efficient framework for design and analysis of hierarchical multidisciplinary design optimization problems.

In our previous work, two kinds of permanent magnet (PM) synchronous motors, transverse flux motor (TFM) and claw pole motor, were designed and fabricated using the soft magnetic composite (SMC) cores. This paper presents multiobjective and robust design optimization for high-quality manufacturing of these PM-SMC motors to improve their industrial applications. Meanwhile, an improved multiobjective sequential optimization method is presented to reduce the computation cost. Thereafter, a PM TFM with SMC core is investigated to illustrate the performance of the proposed method. From the discussion, it can be found that six sigma quality manufacturing was achieved for all Pareto design schemes given by the proposed method. Furthermore, manufacturing cost and computation cost have been reduced a lot.

A preliminary design optimization approach of axial flow compressors is developed. Loss correlations associated with airfoil geometry are introduced to relax the stringent requirement for the designer to prescribe the stage efficiency. In face of the preliminary design complexity resulted from the large number of design variables together with their stringent variation ranges and multiple design goals, the multi-objective optimization algorithm is incorporated. With such a developed preliminary design optimization method, the design space can be then explored extensively and the optimum designs of both high level overall efficiency and wide stall margin can be readily achieved. The preliminary design optimization method is validated in two steps. Firstly, an existing 5-stage compressor is redesigned without optimization. The obtained geometries and flow parameters are compared to the existing data and a good consistency is achieved. Then, the redesigned compressor is used as initial design and optimized by the developed multi-objective preliminary design optimization method, and significant performance gains are obtained, which demonstrates the effectiveness of the developed optimization methods.

Multiobjective optimization is one of the key challenges in engineering design process. Since the answer to such problem is not unique, a set of evenly distributed solutions is particularly important for a designer. The Directed Search Domain (DSD) method is a numerical optimization approach that has proven to be efficient enough to tackle such optimization problems. In this paper, we propose two modifications to the DSD approach which make the solution algorithm simpler for program implementation. These modifications are related to the control of the search domain and reformulation of the appropriate single objective optimization problem. As a result, the computational efficiency of the method is increased due to the lower number of objective function evaluations. The capabilities of the new approach are demonstrated on a set of test cases.

Research on multidisciplinary fatigue optimization design method in structural design of high speed train

A blowout preventer (BOP) is a large valve that encases an oil well on the surface. The valve may be closed while drilling if overpressure from a reservoir causes formation fluids such as oil and natural gas to back up within the wellbore and endanger the rig. A pipe ram is one of the critical components in the BOP system, which is designed to seal around a drill pipe, restricting the flow in the annulus between the outside of the drill pipe and the wellbore. The pipe ram design family, which contains hundreds of pipe ram designs, intends to cover different configurations to suit a variety of dill pipe sizes. To assure their structural integrity under service loads, these pipe rams need to be designed to meet the stress requirements per the American Petroleum Institute (API) Specification 16A and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section VIII, Division 2. With a conventional manual design workflow, it would take a significant amount of time and effort to complete all the designs for the product family with code compliance. Therefore, a scalable solution is highly desirable for delivery of customer-needed ram blocks with much shorter lead time. MDO (Multi-Disciplinary Optimization) involves multi-code integration, CAE (Computer-Aided Engineering) workflow automation, design space exploration, and optimization. MDO-enabled, automated design optimization is becoming increasingly popular in both scientific and engineering communities. In this paper, a methodology for integration of CAD (Computer Aided Design), FEA (Finite Element Analysis), cost, and optimization packages to enable FEA automation and design optimization is presented. A BOP pipe ram is adopted as the use case. The ram block geometry was parameterized before being imported into an FEA package. The FEA workflow was automated such that once a set of geometric parameters are given, the preprocessing, solving, and postprocessing steps can be automatically completed. As part of the FEA postprocessing, stress linearization analysis per the API and ASME BPVC codes has also been automated, which had never been done in the past. A manufacturing cost analysis package can also be used to consume the parameterized geometry for automatic manufacturability assessment and cost predictions. The stress analysis and cost analysis workflows are conducted separately but also orchestrated by an MDO package. Reports that contain the analysis results are sequentially generated for various design permutations. The MDO-enabled automated design and cost analysis approach could substantially enhance efficiency and consistency in performing FEA and cost studies and producing analysis reports. It is also the backbone for automated design optimization, which could significantly improve the product performance and reliability and, meanwhile, minimize the development and product cost.

The design of space systems is a complex and multidisciplinary process with multiple conflicting objectives, large number of design variables, and constraints that limits application of the existing multidisciplinary design optimization architectures to this class of design problems. This paper presents an enhanced multidisciplinary design optimization architecture to concurrent holistic design optimization of a satellite system. The proposed multidisciplinary design optimization architecture extends concepts of multidiscipline feasible and bi-level integrated system synthesis into a unified architecture using metamodels. The proposed architecture was evaluated and compared with the existing multidisciplinary design optimization architectures that include all-at-once, bi-level integrated system synthesis, and multidisciplinary design optimization using a remote sensing small satellite in low earth orbit. The satellite design optimization problem deals with the minimization of the total mass of the satellite, involving disciplines of mission analysis, payload, structures, attitude determination and control, communication, command and data handling, power and thermal. The computational performance and accuracy of the proposed architecture were compared with multidisciplinary design optimization benchmark problems. Then the proposed architecture is successfully applied to the satellite system design problem. The results obtained show that metamodel-based bi-level integrated system synthesis-multidisciplinary design optimization architecture presented in this paper provides an effective way of solving large-scale design problems.

Bi-level multi-objective fuzzy design optimization of energy supply systems aided by problem-specific heuristics

All engineering design problems can be characterized by the underlying assumptions around which the problem is formulated. The effect of these assumptions - including everything from general assumptions defining an operating environment to detailed assumptions regarding material properties - is variability in system performance, and resulting deviations from expected performance. Assumptions are made to eliminate uncertainties that would prevent the quantification of design performance. Probabilistic methods have been developed in recent decades to convert such deterministic problem formulations into probabilistic formulations to model and assess the effects of these known uncertainties and thus relax restrictive assumptions. Until very recently, however, the computational expense of probabilistic analysis of a single design has made its application impractical for all but very simplistic design problems. Consequently, probabilistic optimization has been considered prohibitively expensive, particularly for complex multidisciplinary systems. Today a number of enabling technologies are available to support probabilistic design analysis and optimization for complex engineering design problems, including: flexible software frameworks that allow integration and automation of a complex multidisciplinary process; probabilistic analysis and optimization tools that allow uncertainty to be modeled and performance variation to be measured and reduced; large scale parallel processing capabilities leading to greatly increased efficiency; and advanced surrogate modeling capabilities to replace complex nonlinear analyses with computationally efficient approximation models. Along with steady increases in computing power, the combination of these enabling technologies can facilitate effective probabilistic analysis and optimization for complex design problems. In this paper we focus primarily on two of these enabling technologies. We present a comprehensive probabilistic design optimization formulation, a six sigma based approach that incorporates variability within all elements of the formulation - input design variable bound formulation, output constraint formulation, and robust objective formulation. We discuss the applicability of kriging, one surrogate modeling approach that supports the approximation of complex nonlinear analyses, for facilitating probabilistic multidisciplinary design optimization. These enabling technologies, as implemented within the commercial software framework provided by iSIGHT, including capability to facilitate parallel processing, are demonstrated for a multidisciplinary conceptual ship design problem.

A number of game strategies have been developed in past decades and used in the fields of economics, engineering, computer science, and biology due to their efficiency in solving design optimization problems. In addition, research in multiobjective and multidisciplinary design optimization has focused on developing a robust and efficient optimization method so it can produce a set of high quality solutions with less computational time. In this paper, two optimization techniques are considered; the first optimization method uses multifidelity hierarchical Pareto-optimality. The second optimization method uses the combination of game strategies Nash-equilibrium and Pareto-optimality. This paper shows how game strategies can be coupled to multiobjective evolutionary algorithms and robust design techniques to produce a set of high quality solutions. Numerical results obtained from both optimization methods are compared in terms of computational expense and model quality. The benefits of using Hybrid and non-Hybrid-Game strategies are demonstrated.