A note on estimation based on record data

Reliability analysis is the key to evaluate software’s quality. Since the early 1970s, the Power Law Process, among others, has been used to assess the rate of change of software reliability as time-varying function by using its intensity function. The Bayesian analysis applicability to the Power Law Process is justified using real software failure times. The choice of a loss function is an important entity of the Bayesian settings. The analytical estimate of likelihood-based Bayesian reliability estimates of the Power Law Process under the squared error and Higgins-Tsokos loss functions were obtained for different prior knowledge of its key parameter. As a result of a simulation analysis and using real data, the Bayesian reliability estimate under the Higgins-Tsokos loss function not only is robust as the Bayesian reliability estimate under the squared error loss function but also performed better, where both are superior to the maximum likelihood reliability estimate. A sensitivity analysis resulted in the Bayesian estimate of the reliability function being sensitive to the prior, whether parametric or non-parametric, and to the loss function. An interactive user interface application was additionally developed using Wolfram language to compute and visualize the Bayesian and maximum likelihood estimates of the intensity and reliability functions of the Power Law Process for a given data.

This article investigates the estimation of the parameters for power hazard function distribution and some lifetime indices such as reliability function, hazard rate function, and coefficient of variation based on adaptive Type-II progressive censoring. From the perspective of frequentism, we derive the point estimations through the method of maximum likelihood estimation. Besides, delta method is implemented to construct the variances of the reliability characteristics. Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques are proposed to construct the Bayes estimates. To this end, the results of the Bayes estimates are obtained under squared error and linear exponential loss functions. Also, the corresponding credible intervals are constructed. A simulation study is utilized to assay the performance of the proposed methods. Finally, a real data set of COVID-19 mortality rate is analyzed to validate the introduced inference methods.

The objective of this study is to examine the properties of Bayes estimators of the shape parameter of the Power Function Distribution (PFD-I), by using two different prior distributions for the parameter θ and different loss functions that were compared with the maximum likelihood estimators. In many practical applications, we may have two different prior information about the prior distribution for the shape parameter of the Power Function Distribution, which influences the parameter estimation. So, we used two different kinds of conjugate priors of shape parameter θ of the Power Function Distribution (PFD-I) to estimate it. The conjugate prior function of the shape parameter θ was considered as a combination of two different prior distributions such as gamma distribution with Erlang distribution and Erlang distribution with exponential distribution and Erlang distribution with non-informative distribution and exponential distribution with the non-informative distribution. We derived Bayes estimators for shape parameter θ of the Power Function Distribution (PFD-I) according to different loss functions such as the squared error loss function (SELF), the weighted error loss function (WSELF) and modified linear exponential (MLINEX) loss function (MLF), with two different double priors. In addition to the classical estimation (maximum likelihood estimation). We used simulation to get the results of this study, for different cases of the shape parameter of the Power Function Distribution used to generate data for different samples sizes.

This study examines the estimation of the scale parameter of the Weibull-Power Function Distribution (WPFD) using both maximum likelihood and Bayesian approaches. Bayesian estimation is conducted under one informative Gamma prior with hyperparameters , as well as two non-informative priors: the uniform prior and Jeffreys’ prior. For each prior specification, Bayes estimators are derived under squared error, quadratic, and precautionary loss functions. Closed-form expressions for the posterior distributions and corresponding Bayes estimators are obtained. The finite-sample performance of the competing estimators is evaluated through a Monte Carlo simulation study based on 1000 replications. Estimator performance is assessed using mean squared error (MSE), bias, and coverage probability. The results indicate that all estimators are consistent, with bias and MSE decreasing as sample size increases. Across different prior specifications and parameter settings, the Bayesian estimator under the quadratic loss function consistently attains the lowest MSE, yielding reductions of approximately 10-20% relative to the maximum likelihood estimator in small and moderate samples. These findings suggest that Bayesian estimation under quadratic loss provides improved finite-sample efficiency for estimating the WPFD scale parameter, while maintaining asymptotic comparability with the maximum likelihood approach.

In this article analysis of a simple step‐stress accelerated life test is considered under progressive type‐II censoring. A cumulative exposure model is considered when the latent lifetimes of test units follow the Gompertz distribution with different shape parameters and a common scale parameter. We explore the study by estimating all unknown parameters using classical and Bayesian techniques. The model parameters are estimated using maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods. Subsequently, interval estimates are derived based on the observed Fisher information matrix. Bayesian estimates are obtained using squared error and linear exponential loss functions. Subsequently highest posterior density intervals are also constructed. We examine the efficiency of all estimators through simulation studies. Finally, we provide a real‐life example in support of the considered model.

In this paper, we developed linear exponential (LINEX) loss function by emerging weights to produce weighted linear exponential (WLINEX) loss function. Then we utilized WLINEX to derive scale parameter and reliability function of the Weibull distribution based on record values when the shape parameter is known. After, we estimated scale parameter and reliability function of Weibull distribution by using maximum likelihood (ML) estimation and by several Bayes estimations. The Bayes estimates were obtained with respect to symmetric loss function (squared error loss (SEL)), asymmetric loss function (LINEX) and asymmetric loss function (WLINEX). The ML and the different Bayes estimates are compared via a Monte Carlo simulation study. The result of simulation mentioned that the proposed WLINEX loss function is promising and can be used in real environment especially at the case of underestimate where it revealed better performance than LINEX loss function for estimating scale parameter.

In this paper, we consider Dagum distribution which is capable of modeling various shapes of failure rates and aging criteria. Based on progressively type-I interval censoring data, we first obtain the maximum likelihood estimators and the approximate confidence intervals of the unknown parameters of the Dagum distribution. Next, we obtain the Bayes estimators of the parameters of Dagum distribution under the squared error loss (SEL) and balanced squared error loss (BSEL) functions using independent informative gamma and non informative uniform priors for both scale and two shape parameters. A Monte Carlo simulation study is performed to assess the performance of the proposed Bayes estimators with the maximum likelihood estimators. We also compute credible intervals and symmetric 100(1 − τ)% two-sided Bayes probability intervals under the respective approaches. Besides, based on observed samples, Bayes predictive estimates and intervals are obtained using one-and two-sample schemes. Simulation results reveal that the Bayes estimates based on SEL and BSEL performs better than maximum likelihood estimates in terms of bias and MSEs. Besides, credible intervals have smaller interval lengths than confidence interval. Further, predictive estimates based on SEL with informative prior performs better than non-informative prior for both one and two sample schemes. Further, the optimal censoring scheme has been suggested using a optimality criteria. Finally, we analyze a data set to illustrate the results derived.

To analyze the performance of various estimators, this paper compares Bayesian and classical estimate approaches across a variety of loss functions. The work focuses on informative versus non-informative priors in Bayesian estimation. The calculations are based on a number of loss functions, including the Square Error Loss Function (SELF), Quadratic Loss Function (QLF), Precautionary Loss Function (PLF), and Entropy Loss Function (ELF). The methodology uses simulation techniques as well as real-world datasets to test the performance and robustness of the proposed estimators. The Bayesian estimators, classical estimators, and related Bayes hazards using empirical analysis and extensive simulations to computed. The findings show that the Minimum Mean Square Error estimator (MiniMSE) is more accurate and reliable than other estimators in a variety of settings. Furthermore, for both types of priors, it is demonstrated that the Bayes risk under the Quadratic Loss Function (QLF) is the lowest among all loss functions considered, including SELF, PLF, and ELF. This suggests that, when compared to other loss functions, QLF is a more effective and balanced criterion for making estimation decisions. The study’s findings provide vital new insights into how to choose the optimum estimate techniques and loss functions for statistical decision theory and practical data processing.

We consider here the generalization of the Bilal distribution proposed by Abd-Elrahman (2017) by zeroing in on two measures of reliability, R(t) and P, based on type II censoring. We obtain point estimators namely, λ and θ, of the above said distribution, when both parameters of the distribution are unknown. Maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs), Bayes estimators (BEs) and Lindley’s approximation for the Bayes estimators are proposed. By using independent noninformative type of priors for the unknown parameters Bayes estimators are derived. Although the proposed estimators cannot be expressed in closed forms, these can be easily obtained through the use of numerical procedures. The performance of these estimators is studied on the basis of their mean squared error (MSE), computed separately under LINEX loss function (LLF) and squared error loss function (SELF) through Monte-Carlo simulation technique.

This study introduces a robust Bayesian framework for simple-step stress accelerated life testing. For modeling lifetime characteristics, this study adopts the Xgamma distribution as the principal life model. Bayesian parameter estimation is conducted using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method under three distinct loss functions: the squared error loss function, generalized entropy loss function, and linear exponential loss function. The resulting Bayesian estimators are analyzed and compared with those obtained through the classical maximum likelihood estimation method. Finally, the proposed methods are illustrated with the analysis of two real data sets.

This paper considers a double-stage Bayesian shrinkage estimation for the scale parameter of a two-parameter exponential distribution when prior information exists as an initial value under progressively type-II censored samples. The mean squared error (MSE) of the proposed estimator is derived under Weighted Squared Error Loss (WSEL) function and it is shown that this estimator dominates the corresponding classical Bayesian estimator. Some graphical representations are also given for the illustration purpose. Simulation study and an numerical example are given to illustrate the proposed method.

In this paper, estimators for the parameters of the Kumaraswamy-inverse Rayleigh distribution based on record values are obtained. These estimators are derived using the maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods. The Bayesian estimators are derived under the well-known squared error (SE) loss function. Prediction of the future sth record value is derived using the maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods. Simulation study is conduct to illustrate the findings.

Empirical Bayes analysis of record statistics based on linex and quadratic loss functions

Stress-strength models are of special importance in reliability literature and engineering applications. This paper deals with the estimation problem of a stress-strength model incorporating multi-component system. The system is regarded as alive only if at least S out of k ( S < k ) strength components exceed the stress. The reliability of such system is obtained when strength and stress variables have Weibull distributions. Maximum likelihood estimator of R S , k and asymptotic confidence intervals are obtained based on upper record values. Bayesian estimator under squared error and linear exponential loss functions using gamma prior distributions and the corresponding credible intervals are obtained. Due to the lack of explicit forms for the Bayes estimates, the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method is employed. A simulation study is implemented to assess the performance of estimates. A real-life example is presented to show how the proposed model may be utilized in breaking strength of jute fibre data.

In this article, the concept of asymptotic pointwise optimality in a single continuous-time process provided by Hwang (2001) is extended to more than one continuous-time process. We propose an asymptotically pointwise optimal (APO) rule, which consists of a sequential allocation procedure and a stopping time, and derive some properties of asymptotic optimality of the rule. In particular, some APO rules are proposed in the Bayes sequential estimation problem for several Poisson processes under both squared error loss and linear exponential loss functions. They are shown to be asymptotically optimal for arbitrary priors and asymptotically nondeficient for conjugate priors.