- Research Article
- 10.5170/cern-1996-007.597
Review of New Developments in the Field of Induction Accelerators (Electrons and Ions)
- Jan 01, 1996
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- S.S Yu
Induction machines have the unique capability of delivering very high current and peak power in a pulsed mode. It was the need for high power for fusion that led Nicholas Christofilus in the 1950’s to invent and build Astron, the first induction accelerator [1]. Since then, various high power applications have led to the construction of the Electron Ring Accelerator (ERA) [2], Experimental Test Accelerator (ETA) [3], Advanced Test Accelerator (ATA) [4], the flash radiography machine FXR and the high repetition rate machine, ETA II [5], which was designed to deliver high average power as well as high peak power. The largest of these machines is ATA with design goals of 50 MeV and 10 kA. All of the high current electron machines since ERA are “short-pulse” devices ( 50 ns). Meanwhile, the invention of heavy ion fusion in the 70’s led to the development of induction machines for ion acceleration [6]. For this application, the devices tend to have long pulses (>1 μs). The induction machines for ions and electrons operate on the same principle. The pulse length difference between electron and ion machines is historical and incidental, although long-pulse devices lead to different approaches to magnetic material and pulse power technology than short-pulse machines. While some of the past applications, particularly those related to the Strategic Defense Initiative, have come and gone, the need for high power continues to exist in energy, environment, national defense, and basic sciences. In this paper, we will review three ongoing applications, one in fusion energy, one in defense, and one in high energy physics. Induction machines for heavy ion fusion [7], for radiography in hydrodynamic tests [8], and for relativistic-klystron twobeam-accelerators [9] are three areas of active research. Induction machines have also been considered for other applications such as treatment of nuclear wastes [10], neutron spallation sources [11], and μμ collider components [12]. These applications will not be reviewed here because of space limitations. In addition, the inductive voltage adder (IVA) technologies are described in a separate paper in these proceedings [13]. The three applications we will review were chosen to demonstrate that with vastly different goals, different machine parameters, and very different architectures, a similar set of performance objectives has led to technological advances along closely parallel paths. In any large machine, the economic issues of cost and efficiency, and the technological issues of machine and beam performance are equally important considerations. We hope to show how these factors have affected the development paths in these three areas. We will first summarize recent activities in each one of these fields, and then proceed to describe issues and advances in the control of beam energy flatness, emittance preservation, and beam instability suppression. While these issues are common to all accelerators, the fact that we are working with very intense beams and long pulses makes the challenges of induction machines unique. For the purpose of this review, we will broadly include the induction accelerators proper, as well as their injectors.
Read more