A Performance Comparison of Color Vision Tests for Military Screening.

Color vision research is not new for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA); the Civil Aerospace Medical Institute has been conducting color vision research and publishing the results since 1967 ( 3 ). The FAA originally initiated color vision research because of the emerging use of color coding in the airport environment and the FAA has continued a line of color vision research because of the increasing use of color coding resulting from changing technology inside the cockpit, on air traffic control displays, and in the airport environment. Color can be used to convey meaning without supplemental signage such as the ubiquitous traffic signal that alerts drivers to proceed with caution via a yellow flashing light or to stop via a red flashing light. However, that meaning is only conveyed if the driver can distinguish between the yellow and the red colors. Approximately 8 to 10% of the male population ( 5 ) has a congenital color vision deficiency and, depending upon the type and severity of that deficiency, that task of interpreting the meaning of color coding may be difficult or impossible. Consequently, the FAA has long maintained a color vision standard for aero-medical screening to ensure that pilots and air traffic controllers can perform safety-related tasks without adverse consequences. Throughout the past few years, the FAA has explored a variety of color vision tests, searching for a valid screening test that has high sensitivity and specificity, meaning the ability to detect the presence or absence of the deficiency, respectively. Basically, color vision tests can be categorized as diagnostic, screening, or occupational tests. Diagnostic tests are designed to specifically diagnose the type and degree of deficiency, the screening tests focus on differentiating between normal or deficient color vision, and the occupational tests seek to separate those capable versus incapable of certain tasks such as identifying colors of wires or lights (e.g., the Farnsworth Lantern test that was developed to assess the ability of potential Navy signalmen for identifying red, green, and white lights). A few tests have been developed for the purpose of precisely diagnosing and classifying color vision; however, when color vision test scores are compared to performance on occupational tasks such as identifying or discriminating colors used in signal lights, precision approach path indicator (PAPI) lights, colored navigation lights, color coded map reading tasks, color coded air traffic control displays, and cockpit displays, a specific cut-point on those selection tests has not been found that can fully separate those who can from those who cannot accurately perform the color-coded pilot or air traffic control tasks. Some tests, including new computerized instruments, have been designed to differentiate defects involving the long wavelength sensitive cones (protan-type), middle wavelength sensitive cones (deutan-type), and short wavelength sensitive cones (tritan-type). Congenital protan and deutan deficiencies are, collectively, extremely common, affecting 1 in 12 men and 1 in 230 women; however, recent evidence indicates that tritan defects are virtually never present at birth (e.g., congenital) and the inherited forms involve S cone photoreceptor degeneration that develops later in life with the exact onset depending upon the specific mutation ( 1, 4 ). Thus, the exact frequency of inherited tritan defects is uncertain; however, it is probably less than 1 in 500. In part, because the underlying pathophysiology has not been well understood, few tests have been available that are capable of detecting tritan deficiencies. In the past, those tests included the single Farnsworth F2 pseudoisochromatic plate (PIP), the Moreland anomaloscope, the Hardy, Rand, Rittler PIP test, and, most recently, the Oculus anomaloscope. Consequently, the occupational color vision tests used by most agencies only screen for the most common (protan and deutan) types of defects. The newly developed computerized color vision tests, including the Colour Assessment and Diagnostic Test, the Cambridge Colour Test, the Cone Contrast Test, and the Computerized Color Vision Test, are all designed to detect tritan defects. However, tritan weaknesses have been noted in several of the FAA ‘ s recent studies in much higher than the traditionally expected numbers and diagnostic agreement is low among those tests when tritan deficiencies are involved. In the past, the FAA and other regulatory organizations have not, or have rarely, required tritan color vision screening in their occupational screening because of the following three factors: the rarity of the congenital defect, the unknown number of individuals affected by acquired deficiencies, and the lack of effective, reliable, valid, and affordable equipment with which to diagnose the deficiency.

Purpose:To investigate the quality of life (QoL) in a sample of color vision deficit (CVD) patients in India and how color vision deficiency affects them psychologically, economically, and in productivity related to their work and occupation.Methods:A descriptive and case–control study design using a questionnaire was conducted on N = 120 participants, of whom 60 were patients of CVD (52 male and eight female) who visited two eye facilities in Hyderabad between 2020 and 2021 and 60 were age-matched normal color vision participants who served as controls. We validated English–Telugu adapted version of CVD-QoL, developed by Barry et al. in 2017 (CB-QoL). The CVD-QoL consists of 27 Likert-scale items with factors (lifestyle, emotions, and work). Color vision was assessed using the Ishihara and Cambridge Mollen color vision tests. A six-point Likert scale was used, with lower scores indicating poor QoL (from 1 = severe issue to 6 = no problem).Results:The CVD-QoL questionnaire’s reliability and internal consistency were measured, including Cronbach’s α (α =0.70–0.90). There was no significance between the group in age (t = −1.2, P = 0.67) whereas the Ishihara colour vision test, scores showed a significant difference (t = 4.50, P < 0.001). The QoL scores showed a significant difference towards lifestyle, emotions and work (P = 0.001). The CVD group had a poorer QoL score than the normal color vision group odds ratio [OR] =0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI], (P = 0.002, CI = 0.14–0.65, Z = 3.0) . In this analysis, a low CI indicated that the OR was more precise.Conclusion:Color vision deficiency affects Indians’ QoL, according to this study. The mean scores of lifestyle, emotions, and work were lower than the UK sample.Since CVD is underreported and possibly affects developing countries more, advocacy for a new health care plan on CVD is essential. Increasing public understanding and awareness could also help diagnosing the CVD population.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of the Cone Contrast Test (CCT) as a color vision screening tool in an Asian population of aircrew applicants and compare it against the Ishihara Psuedo Isochromatic Plates (PIP) - Edridge Lantern Test (ELT) screening pathway, assessing its impact on attrition with CCT cut-off scores of 55 and 75.METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 862 Republic of Singapore Airforce aircrew applicants tested with CCT and Ishihara PIP-ELT combination as screening. CCT repeatability was analyzed by comparing the subject's interocular (right vs. left eye) scores measured as the coefficient of repeatability (COR), with COR differing by ≥15 points considered to be outside normal limits.RESULTS: Of the applicants, 17 (1.97%) failed to achieve a CCT score of ≥55 (5 protan, 12 deutan), while 26 (3.02%) applicants failed to achieve a score ≥75 (5 protan, 21 deutan). Of the 17 applicants who obtained a CCT score of <55, 16 failed the Ishihara PIP test. The only applicant who passed the Ishihara PIP test had a CCT score of 50. Of all applicants, 1.7% had a COR of ≥15, with 93.3% of them identified as color vision deficient (CVD). Our results demonstrated excellent test repeatability, with 99.9% (835 out of 836) of color vision normal (CVN) applicants achieving a COR of <15 points.CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated a high correlation between the CCT (passing score of ≥55) and the Ishihara PIP. Employing the CCT with a passing score of ≥75, instead of the Ishihara PIP-ELT combination, led to an increase in attrition rate of 0.7-3.0%.Chay IW, Lim SWY, Tan BBC. Cone Contrast Test for color vision deficiency screening among a cohort of military aircrew applicants. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2019; 90(2):71-76.

The Ishihara Test (IT) is arguably the most sensitive and commonly used color vision test within aviation and other occupational environments, but when no errors are allowed -20% of normal trichromats fail the test. The number of allowed errors varies in different occupations and sometimes within the same environment (such as aviation) in order to reflect the difficulties of the color-related tasks. The implicit assumption is that the plates can be ranked in order of difficulty. The principal aim of this study was to investigate whether appropriate "weights" can be attached to each IT plate to reflect the likelihood of producing a correct response. A second aim was to justify the use of color thresholds for quantifying the loss of red-green (RG) and yellow-blue (YB) chromatic sensitivity. We investigated 742 subjects (236 normals, 340 deutans, and 166 protans) using the first 25 plates of the 38-plate IT and measured RG chromatic sensitivity using the Color Assessment and Diagnosis (CAD) test. The IT error scores provided plate-specific "weights" which were used to calculate a Severity Index (SI) of color vision loss for each subject. Error scores, SI values, and CAD thresholds were measured and compared in each of the three subject groups. Color thresholds can provide a good measure of the severity of both RG and YB color vision loss. Neither the number of IT plates failed nor the SI value computed in this way can be used to determine reliably the severity of color vision loss.

Numerical Confusion Errors in Ishihara Testing: Findings From a Population-based Study

Daily experience shows that colour of a very distant object cannot be accurately determined. It is assumed that visual acuity (VA) loss is one of the factors at play in this case. The effects of reduced VA as a result of refractive error or optical defocus on colour vision have not been examined. Such study willdictate the need or otherwise for optical correction before assessment of colour vision. The purpose of this study therefore, was to investigate the effects of optical defocus on colour vision in individuals with normal colour vision. Twenty nine young adult subjects (11 male and 18 females) were included in this study. Their ages ranged from 11 to 29 years with a mean of 22.1 ± 3.4 years. All subjects had VA of 6/6 or better and normal colour vision. The colour vision was evaluated with the Farnsworth panel D-15 (desaturated). Each subject was optically defocused to VA of 6/24, 6/60 and 1/60(6/360) at 6 meters respectively and colour vision was assessed at each reduced VA. At VA of 6/24, colour vision was not affected in all subjects. When the VA was reduced to 6/60, however, 15 (51%) of the subjects failed the colour vision test. When the VA was further reduced to 1/60 by optical defocus, 24 (83%) of the subjects failed the colour vision test. It was concluded that optical defocus and reduced VA can adversely affect colour vision test findings. While VA reduction to 6/24 may not affect the colour vision results, VA of 6/60 can. It is therefore, recommended that in clinical colour vision testing and colour vision screening, VA should first be assessed andcompensated, especially if uncorrected VA is 6/24 or worse.

Clinical Color Vision Testing and Correlation With Visual Function

Because color vision impairment is a loss of visual function that accompanies most ocular disease, information about the color sense provides vital data for use in clinical investigation and diagnosis. However, not all types of clinical tests of color vision are equally applicable to the detection and evaluation of such acquired dyschromatopsias; in particular, pseudoisochromatic tables prove inadequate and inefficient when compared with sorting tests. In this study, twelve patients with Dominantly Inherited Juvenile Optic Atrophy were investigated with the following tests of color vision — the Ishihara, AOHRR and Farnsworth tritan (F2) pseudoisochromatic plates, the Farnsworth-Munsell 100 hue and 28 hue, the Panel D-15, and the Nagel Anomaloscope. Ten patients had an acquired dyschromatopsia: of these, eight had a tritan defect, one an achromasy and another a very mild unilateral chromatic amblyopia. As expected, the sorting tests proved superior to the pseudoisochromatic plates in the investigation. The way in which previous failure to test color vision properly delayed accurate diagnosis of the patients' condition is illustrated by reference to their ocular histories.

This paper describes a novel test of colour vision using a standard personal computer, which is simple and reliable to perform. Twenty healthy individuals with normal colour vision and 10 healthy individuals with a red/green colour defect were tested binocularly at 13 selected points in the CIE (Commission International d'Eclairage, 1931) chromaticity triangle, representing the gamut of a computer monitor, where the x, y coordinates of the primary colour phosphors were known. The mean results from individuals with normal colour vision were compared to those with defective colour vision. Of the 13 points tested, five demonstrated consistently high sensitivity in detecting colour defects. The test may provide a convenient method for classifying colour vision abnormalities.

Aims: To investigate whether there is an association between congenital colour vision defects (CVD) and occupational choice and employment history, in order to inform the debate about the value of...

Color vision testing can be accomplished by several means, each of which has its virtues and limitations. The most common test of color perception is the pseudoisochromatic plate. This is a card composed of a field of dots of varying hue and saturation within which persons with normal color vision can see some figure, but persons with a color vision defect cannot. Alternatively, some pseudoisochromatic plates are constructed so that color normals see one figure and color defectives another. These tests rely upon either the reduced hue discrimination or the reduced saturation discrimination of color defectives as a means of identification of these color defectives. Unfortunately, the illuminant under which the test is conducted is critical, and the diagnostic value of this type of test is limited.

Color vision tests use estimative of threshold color discrimination or number of correct responses to evaluate performance in chromatic discrimination tasks. Both approaches have advantages and disadvantages. In the present investigation, we compared the number of errors during color discrimination task in normal trichromats and participants with color vision deficiency (CVD) using pseudoisochromatic stimuli at fixed saturation levels. We recruited 28 normal trichromats and eight participants with CVD. Cambridge Color Test was used to categorize their color vision phenotype, and those with a phenotype suggestive of color vision deficiency had their L- and M-opsin genes genotyped. Pseudoisochromatic stimuli were shown with target chromaticity in 20 vectors radiating from the background chromaticity and saturation of 0.06, 0.04, 0.03, 0.02, 0.01, and 0.005 u’v' units. Each stimulus condition appeared in four trials. The number of errors for each stimulus condition was considered an indicator of the participant's performance. At high chromatic saturation, there were fewer errors from both phenotypes. The errors of the normal trichromats had no systematic variation for high saturated stimuli, but below 0.02 u’v' units, there was a discrete prevalence of tritan errors. For participants with CVD, the errors happened mainly in red-green chromatic vectors. A three-way ANOVA showed that all factors (color vision phenotype, stimulus saturation, and chromatic vector) had statistically significant effects on the number of errors and that stimulus saturation was the most important main effect. ROC analysis indicated that the performance of the fixed saturation levels to identify CVD was better between 0.02 and 0.06 u’v’ units reaching 100%, while saturation of 0.01 and 0.005 u’v’ units decreased the accuracy of the screening of the test. We concluded that the color discrimination task using high saturated stimuli separated normal trichromats and participants with red-green color vision deficiencies with high performance, which can be considered a promising method for new color vision tests based in frequency of errors.

Inclusion of public service professions in the UK Disability Discrimination Act in 2004 prompted a review of occupational colour vision requirements for police officers. Changes in the regulations which existed prior to 2003 were proposed. The aim of this study was to obtain the views of serving police officers in Northern Ireland on the importance of good colour discrimination in everyday police work and on the recruitment regulations for patrol constables introduced in 2003 in mainland UK. These views were obtained by means of a questionnaire and informal discussions. More than 65% of police officers who responded to the questionnaire considered that good colour vision was very important for effective policing. Fewer than 2% considered that colour vision was unimportant. Experienced police officers agreed that the employment of colour-deficient patrol constables, as permitted in the new regulations, would lead to reduced efficiency and organisational difficulties at the local level. A number of everyday activities were described which showed the need for accurate colour discrimination. The change in recruitment policy and the lack of clarity in the new regulations show inadequate appreciation of the needs of the occupation, of different types of colour vision anomalies and of the diagnostic function of colour vision tests. Failure to provide guidance on appropriate colour vision tests, examination procedures and counselling services is likely to result in inconsistent employment policies in different police forces. It is recommended that the colour vision standard in place prior to 2003 is reinstated at the recruitment stage. The Ishihara test should be used for screening, and colour-deficient applicants further examined with the Farnsworth D15 test as a replacement for the City University Test 2nd edition.

Hahn's New Pseudoisochromatic Colour Vision Test contains provision for screening red-green and blue-yellow colour vision deficiencies, a qualitative diagnosis as protan and deutan, and a quantitative diagnosis of red-green deficiencies. In this study 58 colour vision deficient and 68 colour vision normal subjects were examined using a battery of colour vision tests. The screening and classification ability of the Hahn test was compared with Ishihara's Test and the Standard Pseudoisochromatic Plates (SPP). The quantitative diagnosis ability was assessed by comparison with the Farnsworth—Munsell D-15 Test, the Farnsworth Lantern, and the Anomaloscope range. The Hahn proved to have a colour vision screening performance comparable with the two other PIC tests. Its classification ability was poor compared with the other PIC tests, one design in the SPP plates was markedly superior. The Hahn's quantitative diagnosis plates did not produce a useful classification; more than 50% of subjects made the full six errors and only 3 of 58 colour vision deficient subjects made less than 3 errors out of the 6 plates. The colorimetric measurements are used to illustrate the design features and are consistent with these performances. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Col Res Appl, 23, 69–77 1998

One of the most common inherited vision disorders is congenital color vision deficiency (CVD). Its prevalence in men can be as high as 8% and 0.5% in women.[1] Men are predominately affected by the X-linked inheritance pattern, while women become carriers of the abnormal gene.[2] There are also different causes for acquired color vision defects, such as ocular or neurological disease, some metabolic disorders, drug toxicity and exposure to certain solvents.[3] Congenital CVD results from genetic mutations that affect the expression of the full complement of normal cone photoreceptors. They’re divided into three categories based on their intensity (anomalous trichromacy, dichromacy, and monochromacy). CVD places the sufferer at a distinct disadvantage when performing certain visual tasks—in particular those tasks in which a colored target is embedded in a variegated background of a different color. CVD affects many areas of life, and its adverse impact is experienced at all stages, i.e., from childhood to adolescence and adulthood.[45] Population is one of the biggest problems in India and the reason for so many compromises starting from lack of resources at every level. Healthcare is just one example. When providing even simple vision assessment in school children becomes a big task few tests like color vision examination is rarely being performed. Population diagnosis is usually late at the time of medical examination at the time of higher education or specific job. They are rarely diagnosed early in life. Late diagnosis leads to rejection for a particular job most of the time which has a psychological impact on individuals. In India where an education system doesn’t give a student to choose multiple streams, it turns out, several professional choices can be negatively impacted by a color blindness diagnosis. CVD is a hidden disability because, though present from birth, its role comes to play only when children begin to attend regular schools to learn some tasks.[6] From here onwards process of considerable difficulties in learning starts. Children with CVD are frequently marked as lethargic students, which could mentally affect them, or could evoke negative responses from instructors and guardian. This can lead to not only problems in learning but also in playing and in their social bonding. Various studies have been carried out all over the world to see the prevalence of CVD among school children.[789] Xie JZ, et al.[10] suggested that successful CVD testing can be done starting at age four. Cole stressed that school children should know if they have CVD so they can be helped more quickly to find adaptive strategies and be able to take it into account when planning their career.[11] Largest study on CVD in children is conducted to see the burden of this disability in India.[12] Authors have used Dalton’s psuedoisochromatic plates for color vision screening. It is based on Ishihara color vision chart principle. The Dalton screener consists of 6 sets with 4 plates in each that includes one demo plate and three screening plates. Those, who failed to read three or more plates in two or more random sets of the Dalton’s pseudoisochromatic plate were considered to have CVD after confirming with Ishihara’s PIP color vision testing (38 plate edition). The result shows CVD among boys was found to be 2.76%. Children from urban region (3.17%) were more likely to be color vision deficient than children from rural region (1.79%). These results are similar to the other parts of the country and few other countries from Asia. Screening of CVD is relatively easy does not require any formal training and can be performed by any assigned staff. Various plate tests are available, such as Ishihara, Tokyo, HRR plate test, which are highly sensitive and specific to detect CVD. Because of rapidly evolving technologies with more and more use of color coded tasks in each sector including education sector and specific job requiring color differentiation, the efforts should be made at a fundamental level in screening of color vision defects during comprehensive school eye health programs. Since CVD is congenital and there is no permanent cure for it. However, advice at an early age could help to find adaptive strategies, which enable them to avoid disappointments in the choice of their future career. Parental education, awareness, genetic counseling strategies in the regions with high CVD incidence could help a lot in minimizing the occurrence of the disorder among their offspring.