- Conference Article
4
- 10.7148/2013-0446
Saturation Relay vs. Relay Transient Identification Tests For A TDS Model
- May 27, 2013
- Libor Pekar + 1 more +1
The paper brings a comparison of two novel combinations of a relay identification test with a Time Delay System (TDS) model. Namely, the on/off plus saturation relay test and relay transient experiment are introduced. In the former case with more then two unknown model parameters, it is necessary to apply some technique for frequency response multiple-points identification; here, the Autotune Variation Plus (ATV+) procedure introducing an artificial delay is utilized. Limit cycles data are evaluated via an unordinary time-domain approach and using the Discrete Time Fourier Transform (DTFT), respectively. Both methodologies are verified and compared on a model of the circuit heating laboratory system with internal delays. INTRODUCTION By autotuning (i.e. automatic tuning), a set of methods which enable the controller to be tuned automatically on demand from an operator or an external signal is meant (Astrom and Hagglund 1984; Hang et al. 2002). Industrial experience has clearly indicated that this is highly desirable and useful feature. The whole procedure usually consists of two basic steps: Process model parameters identification followed by controller tuning; however, some approaches do not require explicit model identification. The relay feedback autotuning (identification) test performing limit cycle oscillations was successfully applied to the autotuning of PID controllers in (Astrom and Hagglund 1984) and it is widely used and in practice as a well applicable technique. It is robust, easy to implement, timesaving, easy to use and close-loop control which keeps the process close to the setpoint. The classical relay-feedback loop scheme with a symmetrical relay is depicted in Figure 1. If the process is stabilizable and has a phase lag of at least π radians, the process input ( ) t u and output ( ) t y are logged until the system reaches stationary oscillations, the amplitude A of error ( ) t e equals the amplitude of ( ) t y and the phase shift between ( ) t e and ( ) t y is –π. Figure 1: Relay-feedback Test Scheme However, the original relay feedback test sometimes called ATV (Autotune Variation) – see (Luyben 1987; Yu 2006) – has two basic drawbacks. First, due to an approximation, the estimation of the critical point is not accurate enough for some processes, such as those with large time delays (Wang et al. 1999). For example, there is an error of 23% for a first order unstable system with input-output delay. Second, the basic test enables to estimate only single point of the frequency characteristics. Hence, there have been investigated and developed many advanced techniques, which should eliminate the two mentioned deficiencies. Much research has been undertaken in identifying multiple points on the process frequency response, for instance, inserting of an integral or a delay element into the open loop (Scali et al. 1999; Tan et al. 1996). In this paper, the basic on/off relay test is improved by the use of a saturation relay (Shen et al. 1996; Yu 2006) for more accurate model parameters estimation followed by the above mentioned artificial-delay test. This approach is confronted with a technique utilizing the relay transient with DTFT (Hang et al 1995; Wang et al. 1997). The advantage of the latter method is that arbitrarily many points on the Nyquist curve can be estimated by a single test. The novel merit of this contribution is that the two methods are verified and benchmarked on a simulated identification relay experiment for a TDS model of a circuit heating laboratory plant (Dostalek et al. 2008; Pekař et al. 2009). Proceedings 27th European Conference on Modelling and Simulation ©ECMS Webjorn Rekdalsbakken, Robin T. Bye, Houxiang Zhang (Editors) ISBN: 978-0-9564944-6-7 / ISBN: 978-0-9564944-7-4 (CD) RELAY-FEEDBACK TEST Let us concisely describe model parameters estimation from the relay feedback test. Consider a simple feedback with and on/off relay as in Figure 1. If the process is stabilizable and has a phase lag of at least π radians, the process input ( ) t u and output ( ) t y are logged until the system reaches stationary oscillations, the amplitude A of error ( ) t e equals the amplitude of ( ) t y and the phase shift between ( ) t e and ( ) t y is –π. Hence, the ultimate period u T is obtained from oscillations, which gives the information about the critical point, together with the ultimate gain which is approximately given by
Read more